Skip to main content

Alan LM Purisima's Play on Words Revisited

It's possible that the mind of Alan LM Purisima would replay events that led to the SAF-44 hearing that followed. It's January 25, 2025, meaning that would be 10 years since the Mamasapano Massacre happened. It was during that time when Malaysian terrorist Zulkifli bin Hir alias Marwan was eventually killed. However, serious disarray and a lack of coordination led to the deaths of 44 people. Watching those videos reminded me of my feisty high school economics teacher. I've been scolded by her many times but I don't hold a grudge. Honestly, I still have a debt of gratitude to my teacher who I always called "Madame Miriam". Yes, she was like the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago in some way! I had grown to respect my MDS style teacher even more after seeing the SAF-44 trial. 

Can you give advice when you're preventively suspended?

Should I be laughing or cringing at Purisima's words? I may be no lawyer, but I don't need a legal law dictionary to understand that Purisima was trying to escape responsibility, ahem, accountability. Either way, it was a circus of words between MDS and Purisima. 

"During my preventive suspension, I did not give any order. I just [gave] advice, not as a directive or order," Purisima told the Senate committee on public order, which was investigating the incident. "I have no role in that operation."

However, former PNP-SAF head Director Getulio NapeƱas Jr. said that he received from Purisima a text message on Jan. 19 on whether the operation to arrest Marwan should proceed.

Facts need to be considered, such as Purisima being on preventive suspension. In school, a suspended student is temporarily out of school. A suspended teacher is temporarily not teaching. Neither the student nor the teacher is expelled from the school. Suspended students couldn't take exams or participate in classes. Suspended teachers couldn't teach and get a salary. In the workplace, suspension means that a person is unauthorized for their duties. 

In short, Purisima was unauthorized to do anything, whether to give advice or an order. In MDS' famous words, it goes like:

"Don't quibble with me... 'I only advised, I did not order.' Really? Buti sana kung wala akong doctorate o hindi ako nag-graduate sa UP. Malas natin I did both," Santiago said.

For non-Tagalog speakers, MDS said, "It would be good if I didn't have a doctorate or graduated from the University of the Philippines. In bad luck, I did both." It may be partly an appeal to authority fallacy. However, it can be much worse when the person giving a stinging rebuke has more credentials than the one who caught his fallacy.  

Purisima giving advice during his preventive suspension was a clear violation. He should've just stayed put because, as MDS states, he was under preventive suspension. To get things clear, the Merriam Webster Dictionary states advice as:

1

: recommendation regarding a decision or course of conduct : counsel

… shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties …

—U.S. Constitution

offering medical advice

a word of advice

2

: information or notice given —usually used in plural

… the latest advices from Mexico …

—Henry David Thoreau

3

: an official notice concerning a business transaction

payment advices

Purisima giving advice (well not an order, according to him) during his preventive suspension is still an act of usurpation. He should not recommend or counsel, as he was preventively suspended. A teacher who's preventively suspended couldn't advice anyone. How much more a police chief who was preventively suspended? I cringed listening to his logic that he "merely gave advice" all before he finally resigned from his post.

Can you truly delegate responsibility without delegating accountability

Even more cringy was when Purisima said, "When I delegated the responsibility, I did not delegate the accountability." There are differences which are:

Responsibility is task-focused. It relates to a person's role in completing a certain task. Accountability is results-focused. It relates to how a person reacts or owns the results of their task.

Purisima claims that he simply delegated the task at hand, but not the results. However. MDS wasn't impressed and said, "You should really hear yourself talk!" However, the legal law dictionary gives this term, which further hits on Purisima's logic:

When one party must report its activities and take responsibility for them. It is done to keep them honest and responsible.

In short, what Purisima said doesn't work well with a seasoned lawyer, like MDS. True, responsibility is focused on the task at hand. It's my responsibility to do the laundry. However, I must also be accountable for the laundry's results. He delegated the tasks and the results were disastrous. In short, the outcome comes with the task. 

Either way, when the task is given, the outcome must also come. Every responsibility means accountability follows. When one fails to do their responsibility, one must take accountability for failing to do it. In short, Purisima's logic truly deserved a beating!

Popular posts from this blog

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

  People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it ), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late.  Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this: It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is...

Taiwan Aboriginal Culture Park Indigenous Bamboo Dance

This is another bamboo dance done by what I believe are Atayal dancers. The dance steps are very similar to what one might find in Nueva Ecija or any indigenous region of the Philippines. What makes it more appealing to me is the absence of Taiwanese Mandarin in the lyrics. Instead, it's lyrics that would sound like the chanting of Filipino indigenous dancers. There are similar yet different movements between Taiwanese aborigines and Filipino aborigines. The Malaysians and Indonesians have settled in several places. The dance movements between Taiwanese aborigines and Filipino aborigines are too similar to be ignored. Even the indigenous language might be very similar. 

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The Happy Aborigines Taiwanese Song

  While looking for an Aborigine song that gave me an earworm--I found this interesting aboriginal song. By looking at this video, I suspect that this song is actually a love song between a man and a woman,. It does sound very Ifugao-like as well. 

"Give Up Tomorrow" Deleted Scene: The Safehouse Where the Crime Supposedly Took Place

Give Up Tomorrow has been an interesting documentary. Why I was fascinated by it because of how it shook my mind. It turned out that it was a trial by publicity . It was also at that time when The Calvento Files aired a dramatization of Davidson Rusia's testimony. As Cebu City Vice Mayor Raymond Alvin Garcia said, it was a very unpopular move. People already thought Juan Francisco G. LarraƱaga aka Paco (and the seven others) were guilty. People thought Davidson's story was worth believing. Some deleted scenes never made it into the final cut  This deleted scene talks about the owner of the place where the crime allegedly happened. David Gurkan now recalls his experience. According to Davidson, this was the story as recorded by the Supreme Court of the Philippines:  From the evidence of the prosecution, there is no doubt that all the appellants conspired in the commission of the crimes charged. Their concerted actions point to their joint purpose and community of intent. Well s...