Skip to main content

Where Dr. Phil McGraw FAILS, He NEEDS to Address Women NOT to Hit Men Too

Dr. Phil videos can be entertaining. I may not be a psychology major, but I must admit, he may be missing the mark. Indeed, men should never hit women. However, Dr. Phil may need to address this other fact--women should also never hit men! If a man should never hit a woman, then a woman should also never hit a man! 

Dr. Phil has a point when he talks about male biology. It's often more outrageous when a man hits a woman, because of a man's physical strength. There are also heavier penalties when people in authority break the rules. A student can be suspended for punching a teacher. However, a teacher can get fired for punching someone. The gravity of the situation can change, depending on the status of the offender. The husband has higher status than the wife, which means any offense he does is going to be heavier. 

I wonder what Dr. Phil would say about this incident. This was during the reign of former president, Atty. Rodrigo R. Duterte. Zhang Jiale is a woman who threw soya pudding at a male police officer. Would Dr. Phil recommend that the police not arrest this deranged Chinese woman? Maybe, maybe not. Because violence done against men is just as real as violence done against women.

And what about this news report? A woman put her hands around a man in anger. What will Dr. Phil say about this? Would he just tell the man to walk away instead of defending himself? I wonder how Dr. Phil will address this woman who just attacked a male driver? 

It's disappointing but let's face it--women's rights don't give them the right to become mean women. Women's rights is all about giving them just and fair treatment. That includes that if a woman commits a crime--she's going to be tried according to the severity of her crime.

Most read entries this week

Does Article VII, Section 5 Make the 1987 Constitution, Unchangeable?

ABS-CBN News I noticed that some stubborn boomers on Facebook are citing Article VII, Section 5, of the "sacred" 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. This is what it says: SECTION 5. Before they enter on the execution of their office, the President, the Vice-President, or the Acting President shall take the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully and conscientiously fulfill my duties as President (or Vice-President or Acting President) of the Philippines, preserve and defend its Constitution, execute its laws, do justice to every man, and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation. So help me God.” (In case of affirmation, last sentence will be omitted.) Does this mean that the 1987 Constitution must be upheld at all costs? The reality is absolutely not . In fact, preserving and defending a constitution doesn't mean that no changes can be made whatsoever. This is the mindset that people like Atty. Hilario Davide Jr. (who...

The Deadly Loophole Concerning Reckless Drivers Who Squeeze In-Between Trucks

Kamote Driver Reviews Right now, it's near Christmas, and Christmas driving drives me crazy. Honestly, I hate how people are always in a  rush during Christmas. I often dread Christmas trips. Christmas isn't the most wonderful time of the year as the popular song wants us to think. Now, I'd like to visit this meme from the Facebook page, Kamote Driver Reviews . The owner of this page certainly has a dark sense of humor, because there's nothing funny about this one.  The reality can't be any clearer. By default, we have the problem that the bigger vehicle tends to be presumed guilty until proven innocent. The democratic process is to presume innocence until proven guilty. However, the public may assume that the person with the bigger vehicle is automatically guilty. The proposed anti-kamote driver (a term used for bad drivers ) bill has this one said, and I believe we really need that bill passed into legislation: The bill’s authors cited an incident last March 11, ...

Today in History: Paco Larrañaga was in QUEZON CITY When the Crime Happened

Photo credited to Michael Collins and Marty Syjuco I remember getting the shock of my life when somebody told me, "You still remember Larrañaga? He was innocent!" in Cebuano. I replied with a "Huh?" It seemed too good to be true. After I heard it, I checked out Give Up Tomorrow (read my review here ) sometime before the badly made movie Jacqueline Comes Home came out in 2018. I decided to check the movie a few years later out of boredom but it was more boring than the rainy evenings (read my review here ). I even had a friend (will not mention his name to protect his privacy) who was with Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga on that night. The photo above couldn't be manipulated at all. If one is in doubt, why not have the photos checked for authenticity rather than just jump to the conclusion?  The Chiong Sisters went missing on July 16, 1997. Paco was later rounded up as one of the suspects in a crime that happened on July 16, 1997. Where was Paco at ...