Skip to main content

Using Insults and Personal Attacks to Win an Argument When "Trust Me Bro" Fails

 

Granted, I'm not a fact checker and I'm just here to blog on facts over gossip. I've noticed that dealing with idiots on Facebook can be tiresome. I'll confess I've lost my cool many times when it comes to insults. What I foolishly never realized is that if people start to be disrespectful and throw insults--it could be a clear indicator of being a disgraceful loser. That kind of behavior is very common in the Trust Me Bro crowd. When asked for a source, they're most likely to say, "Just trust me, bro." If they feel they're losing the argument--they start getting disrespectful and start making insults. They can go from name calling or any form of Ad Hominem or personal attack.

I remembered how often I lost my cool. I could remember whining, crying, or acting like a child. However, if there's one thing worth thinking about, shouldn't I be laughing instead that my opponent is insulting me? It's because if my opponent starts insulting me like calling me names, saying I'm this or that, then the ground is very shaky. Their position is rather shaky when they start to hurl insults at me. It's because they feel threatened. They start throwing insults at me like a cornered cat. They want to win, and they want to feel to win, but deep within, they know they're cornered so they act like cornered cats.  

There were many arguments I could read on Facebook. I could remember a certain political science graduate. Another was a withered dancer in his early 60s (he was 24 in 1986, do the math). Both still insisted that the Marcos Regime in the 1970s was parliamentary. I kept citing the benefits of the parliamentary system. The political science graduate called me stupid and an animal. The withered dancer kept saying I was crazy and I should get my injection. I asked for empirical evidence. Instead, they gave me insults in hopes that they could "win" the argument.

This is the classic case of cognitive dissonance. The whole issue of using insults to win an argument is because they lost the argument. One of those fools I've argued with even said, "I'm just here to expose to people how stupid you are. Hahahahahahaha!" Does the hahahahahaha at the end even validate the argument? I wanted to punch the person. Instead, I was told why not laugh it off? Why not let the person enjoy his blunder?

We also have the classic case of the Duning-Kruger Effect. This is where people of low ability have the tendency to overestimate their ability. Being stupid is one thing. Not knowing you're intellectually stupid is another. That's why there's a proverb that says, "The empty container makes the most noise." The constant use of insults and personal attacks from such people can be empirical evidence of one's own foolishness. 

Most read entries this week

Does Article VII, Section 5 Make the 1987 Constitution, Unchangeable?

ABS-CBN News I noticed that some stubborn boomers on Facebook are citing Article VII, Section 5, of the "sacred" 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. This is what it says: SECTION 5. Before they enter on the execution of their office, the President, the Vice-President, or the Acting President shall take the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully and conscientiously fulfill my duties as President (or Vice-President or Acting President) of the Philippines, preserve and defend its Constitution, execute its laws, do justice to every man, and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation. So help me God.” (In case of affirmation, last sentence will be omitted.) Does this mean that the 1987 Constitution must be upheld at all costs? The reality is absolutely not . In fact, preserving and defending a constitution doesn't mean that no changes can be made whatsoever. This is the mindset that people like Atty. Hilario Davide Jr. (who...

The Deadly Loophole Concerning Reckless Drivers Who Squeeze In-Between Trucks

Kamote Driver Reviews Right now, it's near Christmas, and Christmas driving drives me crazy. Honestly, I hate how people are always in a  rush during Christmas. I often dread Christmas trips. Christmas isn't the most wonderful time of the year as the popular song wants us to think. Now, I'd like to visit this meme from the Facebook page, Kamote Driver Reviews . The owner of this page certainly has a dark sense of humor, because there's nothing funny about this one.  The reality can't be any clearer. By default, we have the problem that the bigger vehicle tends to be presumed guilty until proven innocent. The democratic process is to presume innocence until proven guilty. However, the public may assume that the person with the bigger vehicle is automatically guilty. The proposed anti-kamote driver (a term used for bad drivers ) bill has this one said, and I believe we really need that bill passed into legislation: The bill’s authors cited an incident last March 11, ...

Today in History: Paco Larrañaga was in QUEZON CITY When the Crime Happened

Photo credited to Michael Collins and Marty Syjuco I remember getting the shock of my life when somebody told me, "You still remember Larrañaga? He was innocent!" in Cebuano. I replied with a "Huh?" It seemed too good to be true. After I heard it, I checked out Give Up Tomorrow (read my review here ) sometime before the badly made movie Jacqueline Comes Home came out in 2018. I decided to check the movie a few years later out of boredom but it was more boring than the rainy evenings (read my review here ). I even had a friend (will not mention his name to protect his privacy) who was with Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga on that night. The photo above couldn't be manipulated at all. If one is in doubt, why not have the photos checked for authenticity rather than just jump to the conclusion?  The Chiong Sisters went missing on July 16, 1997. Paco was later rounded up as one of the suspects in a crime that happened on July 16, 1997. Where was Paco at ...