The Hypocrisy of the #JusticeForFlor Movement

-

 

It may already be past the late Flor Contemplacion'death anniversary. However, I felt like writing this piece because of two severely miscarried cases. The first case was the Vizconde Massacre (read here). The second case is that of the Chiong Sisters (read here). The cry has stayed the same since 1995 up to 2024. It's still #JusticeForFlor and it'll be 40 years by 2025. As far as concerned, a movie was made about the Vizconde Massacre while the trial was going on. A film about Flor's life was made in the same year she was executed. A movie about the Chiong Sisters Case was only made in 2018.

Some people insist that Flor was innocent. However, we need to compare the justice system of the two countries. I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry P. Webb and Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga were guilty. I was shocked to find out that a friend of mine was with Paco in Quezon City, on that same night of the crime. There were several witnesses. Why didn't the Supreme Court of the Philippines bother to examine it? What happened to presumed innocent before being declared guilty? The Chiong 7 weren't even allowed to defend themselves. The judge did a shoddy job. Some interviews I never saw back then involved Dong Puno Live. Dong Puno interviewed Paco, Josman Azmar, and the two Uy brothers, James Anthony and James Andrew. They were all victims of frame-up. Later, I realized that Hubert was also framed alongside other people while he was in America. 

Some people continue to say that Flor was the victim of a frame-up. The same crowd may contain the people who still believe that both Hubert and Paco were guilty. The evidence that Hubert was in America and Paco was in Manila was overwhelming. Flight records were there. However, the judges involved namely the late Judge Martin Ocampo and retired judge Atty. Amelita G. Tolentino had dismissed the pieces of evidence. Tolentino said it's not the amount of evidence but the quality of it. However, she shot herself at the foot by refusing to have the evidence of Hubert's innocence examimed. Imagine that Hubert wasted 15 years of his life for a crime he couldn't have committed. I think Hubert also had some bad records like Paco did. However, that doesn't change the fact they didn't commit the crimes. Also, for the alleged kidnapping attempt back in 1995, Paco would be at least only 17 years old. If Paco really did attempt it, it doesn't change the fact he was in Manila when the Chiong Sisters suddenly went missing that rainy night. It was so dark that I believe it's difficult to identify anybody.

Back to Flor, she was arrested and tried, and evidence was examined. Singapore had already gone from third world to first world at that point. Although the late Fidel V. Ramos originally wanted to cut ties with Singapore, something else happened. This detail from the National Library Board of Singapore shows a two-sides of the story examination of Flor's execution:

Contemplacion’s execution sparked intense public outrage in the Philippines against the Singapore government. Demonstrations were staged outside the Singapore embassy and Singapore flags were burned.29 The embassy reported receiving threats against Singaporeans and Singapore properties in the country30 and there were calls to boycott Singapore products there.31 The Philippine public, who considered Contemplacion a heroine, also directed their anger against their own government, which was criticised for not doing enough to protect the country’s millions of overseas contract workers.32 Fearing for their safety, several Singaporeans working in the Philippines left the country and many who were there on holiday or business cut short their visit.33

All this occurred in the run-up to the Philippine national elections on 8 May 1995, putting severe pressure on the Ramos administration and leading the Philippine government to certain actions that in turn soured diplomatic relations with Singapore.34 A few days after the execution, the Philippines recalled its Singapore ambassador and downgraded its diplomatic representation here to charge d’affaires.35 Singapore responded by recalling its Philippine ambassador as well.36 The April visit of then prime minister Goh Chok Tong to Manila, and joint naval exercises planned for July were also postponed.37

Ramos even threatened to sever diplomatic ties with Singapore if the special commission he had created on 20 March 1995 found Contemplacion to be a victim of injustice.38 The commission’s report, submitted on 6 April, added fuel to the fire with its conclusion that Contemplacion might have been innocent and that the case should be re-opened.39 The Singapore government rejected the findings but agreed to re-examine Maga’s remains.40

Two autopsies later, a joint one in April by experts from both sides and a second one in July by an independent panel,41 the Philippine government finally accepted the original findings of Singapore’s pathologists, and thus began the process of reconciliation between the two countries.42

Ramos (and also former president, Atty. Rodrigo R. Duterte) both made several blunders. Duterte led a protest at that time. Eventually, the two autopsies proved that Flor was indeed guilty. It was a good thing for the Singaporean government to agree to re-examine Delia's remains. Even the family members of Delia believe that Flor was indeed the murderer. Ramos began the process of reconciliation and it's a good thing. However, groups like Migrante still insisted that Flor was a victim of injustice, a martyr, a heroine, etc. That's why there's a probability that The Flor Contemplacion Story was uploaded on YouTube because of the ongoing People's Initiative for Charter Change. 

Meanwhile, what about the trials of Hubert and Paco, who some people believe, are still guilty? 

A Supreme Court decision can be severely flawed. People would say that why should they believe a documentary made by a "relative" (and a foolish girl I ran into called Marty Syjuco, Paco's "cousin") who by the way, hardly knew Paco, except when meeting him on his brother Miguel Syjuco's wedding. Miguel is married to Paco's sister Mimi Larrañaga. Miguel hardly knew Paco and by law, Paco is only a brother of his sister-in-law. In short, there's no legal relation. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's chief justice at that time was Hilario G. Davide Jr. who was married to Virginia Jimenea Perez, a relative of the mother of the victims, Thelma Jimenea-Chiong. No further testing was done on the body which some doubt may not be the late Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. Do I need to mention that Cheryl Jimenea was a maternal aunt of the victims too? They wanted justice but ended up clouding the whole judicial process. 

While watching Give Up Tomorrow, a lot of glaring flaws were highlighted. These are some that could be highlighted in the trial of the century:

  1. People were demanding action because, for so many months, it caused panic. 
  2. Pablo Labra II's premature arrest of people based on past actions rather than evidence. Even worse, the accused weren't allowed to defend themselves. The basis of the guilt was inability to defend one's self.
  3. The judge demanded evidence, but when given evidence, would do things like not giving any examination before dismissal. At one point, the judge even declared the identity of the body in Carcar, irrelevant. Later, the judge even doubted the body in Carcar was really Marijoy. 
  4. The judge refused to listen to the testimony of the friends of the accused because they were friends. Never mind that the whole process involved connections namely Thelma's sister Cheryl was close to former president Joseph Estrada.
  5. Estrada played a role in the whole case. Did the Supreme Court actually dismiss the motion of reconsideration because of him? If so, 
In Hubert's case, the suspect himself requested to have his DNA tested against the sperm cell found in the late Carmela Vizconde's body. Even worse, the judge herself was very biased. Why was the video dismissed that "it could've been tampered with" before it was examined? Why was the American embassy not even honored? The judge herself was said to be eyeing for a promotion. If so, the whole process was botched. Where was the DNA testing done on the blood stains too? Hubert could've been wrongfully executed in that case. 

So what's the basis for Flor's innocence then? An autopsy was done on Delia's body. However, where was the autopsy done on the alleged remains of Marijoy, which I believe are hers? Why wasn't further examination done at the claim that Paco's sperm was found in the dead woman's body? Why weren't the sperm of the others found there? A DNA test could've proven something. Even if the body was indeed Marijoy's, further testing would still exonerate the guilty of what happened. The same thing could've been done for the Vizcondes. Why are people questioning the forensic results that proved Flor guilty while defending the shoddy trials of two crimes that are still cases unclosed? That's a very huge double standard there!

A simple lesson is (and you don't need a criminology degree here) that just because a crime happened, doesn't mean the suspects are already guilty. Until now, both the Chiong case and the Vizconde case are still case unclosed. Who really did those crimes? Singapore had already solved the Flor case. However, the Philippines still must shamefully bear the fact that the justice system failed to find the real perpetrators of the Chiong Sisters Case and the Vizconde Case. No justice is ever served by punishing the wrong people and trying to whitewash the guilty. 

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-
Image
As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow -- a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia --it was really a trial by gossip . In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro.  I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how cou
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more