Skip to main content

Real Talk: Kakampink Fanatics Aren't Above Personality-Based Politics

Asia Society

I didn't want to write this post. However, I feel some urgency, especially with some people who have low reading comprehension, and made Ad Homimen attacks against Senator Robinhood Padilla. Should it be a surprise to a nation where reading comprehension is in danger? Now, I'd like to write another topic. It's crazy how some Kakampinks may think they're above personality-based politics. However, take a look at the picture above this paragraph. It's no different from the Marcos fanatics, Duterte fanatics, etc. That's why there's the term Noytard, Dutertard, Marcostard, etc. The -tard is from retard, which means someone who was an intellectual disability. However, I think -tard is too good since a retarded person may actually be behaving more decently than people with a graduate school or doctorate degree, from highly prestigious universities.




It makes me think of Gerry Cacandindin's posts on Facebook. Thankfully, his Facebook profile is off-limits to non-contacts. Otherwise, I might've already given him some real talk, not just a Ted Talk. The guy might think he's above personality-based politics. However, the guy has already been into personality politics like:
  1. Talking about the late former president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III as if he were without flaws. Noynoy had his accomplishments, but he had his flaws. We need to look into both. 
  2. He has the tendency to paint Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, as if she's some kind of fairy godmother, who will solve problems overnight.
  3. Calling Ma'am Heidi and Atty. Luke is "the answer", rather than providing the answer. Again, if that's not personality-based politic,s then what is?



Reading his posts on Twitter is similar to reading Butthurt Philippines. I'm thankful that Butthurt Philippines has already blocked me. The artist Lico Reloj made this artwork. So much for criticizing Noynoy. Now, if this isn't personality-based politics, then I wonder what it is? Of course, it seems that Lico himself is basically a balimbing. Balimbing is an expression used to describe a turncoat. Balimbing is also the Filipino word for star fruit. Now moving on...


This of course is one of the commetns I got into an argument with Lico. If this was written on April 1, we'd get it. Some people think I don't get sarcasm. Okay, I understand that word elonggation is often used to convey sarcasm. However, the word elonggation was written in the word "magkaisa" meaning "let's unite". The word elonggation could've been used in "did nothing wrong" and "perfect", like saying "diiiiiid noooootttthhinnnggg wroooonggg" and "peerrrffeeect". People often elongate words to conveyy their sarcasm. If Lico were just being sarcastic when he posted it, did he even read 11 ways to indicate sarcasm, such as the use of italics and the most obvious quotation marks? It's no surprise now that Lico has been sharing Gerry's posts. It's probably because they think alike.

But again, Lico who says the facts are butthurt, is really butthurt himself. It doesn't help that he actually tried to gaslight me more than once. Too bad I didn't screenshot it before the page blocked me. But either way, their criticism has been pretty much proof that they're not above personality-based politics. Sure, they could be anti-Duterte for all I care. However, they lack the intellectual approach of people like the late Charles Edmund "Carlos" P. Celdran and economist Andrew James Masigan. In my own opinion, the use of comic strips over writing a post (with pictures, if needed) may reveal Lico's rather stubborn mind

In all of these, it's annoying how the Kakampink fanatics have this entitlement mentality. It's no different than the Duterte fanatics who are smearing the Kakampink fanatics. All these fights spring out from personality-based politics. 

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T...

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...