Skip to main content

Real Talk: Kakampink Fanatics Aren't Above Personality-Based Politics

Asia Society

I didn't want to write this post. However, I feel some urgency, especially with some people who have low reading comprehension, and made Ad Homimen attacks against Senator Robinhood Padilla. Should it be a surprise to a nation where reading comprehension is in danger? Now, I'd like to write another topic. It's crazy how some Kakampinks may think they're above personality-based politics. However, take a look at the picture above this paragraph. It's no different from the Marcos fanatics, Duterte fanatics, etc. That's why there's the term Noytard, Dutertard, Marcostard, etc. The -tard is from retard, which means someone who was an intellectual disability. However, I think -tard is too good since a retarded person may actually be behaving more decently than people with a graduate school or doctorate degree, from highly prestigious universities.




It makes me think of Gerry Cacandindin's posts on Facebook. Thankfully, his Facebook profile is off-limits to non-contacts. Otherwise, I might've already given him some real talk, not just a Ted Talk. The guy might think he's above personality-based politics. However, the guy has already been into personality politics like:
  1. Talking about the late former president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III as if he were without flaws. Noynoy had his accomplishments, but he had his flaws. We need to look into both. 
  2. He has the tendency to paint Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, as if she's some kind of fairy godmother, who will solve problems overnight.
  3. Calling Ma'am Heidi and Atty. Luke is "the answer", rather than providing the answer. Again, if that's not personality-based politic,s then what is?



Reading his posts on Twitter is similar to reading Butthurt Philippines. I'm thankful that Butthurt Philippines has already blocked me. The artist Lico Reloj made this artwork. So much for criticizing Noynoy. Now, if this isn't personality-based politics, then I wonder what it is? Of course, it seems that Lico himself is basically a balimbing. Balimbing is an expression used to describe a turncoat. Balimbing is also the Filipino word for star fruit. Now moving on...


This of course is one of the commetns I got into an argument with Lico. If this was written on April 1, we'd get it. Some people think I don't get sarcasm. Okay, I understand that word elonggation is often used to convey sarcasm. However, the word elonggation was written in the word "magkaisa" meaning "let's unite". The word elonggation could've been used in "did nothing wrong" and "perfect", like saying "diiiiiid noooootttthhinnnggg wroooonggg" and "peerrrffeeect". People often elongate words to conveyy their sarcasm. If Lico were just being sarcastic when he posted it, did he even read 11 ways to indicate sarcasm, such as the use of italics and the most obvious quotation marks? It's no surprise now that Lico has been sharing Gerry's posts. It's probably because they think alike.

But again, Lico who says the facts are butthurt, is really butthurt himself. It doesn't help that he actually tried to gaslight me more than once. Too bad I didn't screenshot it before the page blocked me. But either way, their criticism has been pretty much proof that they're not above personality-based politics. Sure, they could be anti-Duterte for all I care. However, they lack the intellectual approach of people like the late Charles Edmund "Carlos" P. Celdran and economist Andrew James Masigan. In my own opinion, the use of comic strips over writing a post (with pictures, if needed) may reveal Lico's rather stubborn mind

In all of these, it's annoying how the Kakampink fanatics have this entitlement mentality. It's no different than the Duterte fanatics who are smearing the Kakampink fanatics. All these fights spring out from personality-based politics. 

Popular posts from this blog

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...

Why I Believe So Many Filipinos (Especially Boomers) Misunderstand (and Blindly Oppose) Charter Change

Okay, I'm no political analyst or historian. That doesn't mean I should just shut up and not share my opinion. I felt like I needed to publish this piece. This is where I want to examine another issue. I've noticed some people on Facebook are sharing the quotes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Some would try to do Ad Hominem attacks on me because I'm no constitutionalist (which I admit that I'm not). Just because I'm not a constitutionalist, doesn't mean, that I can't quote from the experts . Do I really need a degree in law at one of those prestigious universities in the Philippines? Sadly, some people are supposedly smarter than me but are the ones spreading nonsense.  Understanding charter change We need to see the definition first to understand why so many Filipinos, especially boomers , are so against it. The Philippine Star   gives this definition of charter change: Charter change, simply, is the process of introducing amendments or revisions to the ...