Skip to main content

The 1978 Batasang Pambansa Proves There was NO Real Parliamentary System


I'm getting tired of people who still insist that the parliamentary system will never work, because it was "tried and tested" during the reign of Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.. However, further data have proven that there was really no parliamentary system. Salvador "Doy" Laurel even mentioned that in Marcos' own words, Marcos was never legitimately installed as president or prime minister. Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr. even mentioned in his speech in Los Angeles, "We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament." The government was supposed to be British type, and it went to the French type. Ninoy rightfully called it 80 Days Around the World.

To think it over, the role of the president in a parliamentary system is supposed to be purely ceremonial. However, one must look at the comedy of errors with the Marcos rule. Marcos' prime minister, until he himself handpicked Cesar Virata as prime minister, was himself (read here). Lee Kuan Yew even gave a negative assessment of Virata to be a nonstarter and no political leader.

As today is the day that Marcos once considered lifting martial law from the Philippines, I would like to highlight why the Batasang Pambansa (National Assembly) wasn't a real parliamentary system. On February 7, 1978 (and years later on February 7, snap elections would happen), Marcos as both president and prime minister (not a real parliamentary) wrote Presidential Decree No. 1296. April 7 became the date of the Batasang Pambansa elections. 

This is an interesting excerpt I'd like to share on that same Presidential Decree, proving that the Philippines never had a parliamentary system:
ARTICLE II—COMPOSITION AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE INTERIM BATASANG PAMBANSA

SEC. 11. Composition.—The interim Batasang Pambansa shall be composed of the incumbent President of the Philippines, representatives elected from the different re­ gions of the nation, those who shall not be less than eighteen years of age elected by their respective sectors, and those chosen by the incumbent President from the members of the Cabinet.

SEC. 12. Apportionment of regional representatives.— There shall be 160 regional representatives to the interim Batasang Pambansa apportioned among the thirteen regions of the nation in accordance with the number of their respective inhabitants and on the basis of a uniform and progressive ratio as follows:

Region I, .12 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Abra; Benguet, including the City of Baguio; Ilocos Norte, including Laoag City; llocos Sur; La Union; Mt. Province; and Pangasinan, including the Cities of Dagupan and San Carlos;

Region II, 7 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Batanes; Cagayan; Ifugao; Isabela; Kalinga-Apayao; Nueva Vizcaya; and Quirino;

Region III, 16 representatives, consisting of the follow­ ing provinces: Bataan; Bulacan; Nueva Ecija, including the Cities of Cabanatuan, Palawan and San Jose; Pam panga, including Angeles City; Tarlac; and Zambales, including Olongapo City;

Region IV, 19 representatives, which comprises Metro Manila as follows: Cities of Manila; Quezon; Caloocan; and Pasay; and the municipalities of Valenzuela, Malabon, Navotas, Makati, Parañaque, Las Pinas, Mandaluyong, San Juan, Pasig, Muntinglupa, Marikina, Pateros and Taguig;

Region IV-A, 20 representatives, consisting of the follow­ ing provinces: Batangas, including the Cities of Batangas and Lipa; Cavite, including the Cities of Cavite, Tagaytay and Trece Martires; Laguna, including San Pablo City; Marinduque; Occidental Mindoro; Oriental Mindoro; Pa­ lawan, including Puerto Princesa City; Quezon, including Lucena City; Rizal; and Romblon;

Region V, 12 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Albay, including Legaspi City; Camarines Norte; Camarines Sur including the Cities of Iriga and Naga; Catauduanes; Masbate; and Sorsogon;

Region VI, 16 representatives, consisting of the follow­ ing provinces: Aldan; Antique; Capiz, including Roxas City; Iloilo, including Iloilo City;and Negros Occidental, including the Cities of Bacolod, Bago, Cadiz, La Carlota, San Carlos and Silay;

Region VII 13 representatives, consisting- of the fol­ lowing provinces: Bohol, incloding Tagbilaran City; Cebu, including the Cities of Cebu, Lapu-Lapu, Mandaue, Toledo and Danao; Negros Oriental, including the Cities of Bais, Camlaon and Dumaguete; and Siquijor;

Region VIII, 10 representatives, consisting of the followi ng provinces: Leyte, including the Cities of Ormoc and Tacloban; Southern Leyte, Eastern Samar; Northern Samar; and Samar, including Calbayog City;

Region IX, 8 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Basilan; Sulu; Tawi-Tawi; Zamboanga del Norte, including the Cities of Dapitan and Dipolog; and Zamboanga del Sur, including the Cities of Pagadian and Zamboanga;

Region X, 9 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Agusan del Norte, including Butuan City; Agusan del Sur; Bukidnon; Camiguin; Misamis Occidental, including the Cities of Oroquieta, Ozamis and Tangub; Misamis Oriental, including the Cities of Cagayan de Oro and Gingoog; and Surigao del Norte, including Surigao City;

Region XI, 10 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Surigao del Sur; Davao del Norte; Davao Oriental; Davao del Sur, including Davao City; and South Cotabato, including General Santos City;

Region XII, 8 representatives, consisting of the following provinces: Lanao del Norte, including Iligan City; Lanao del Sur, including Marawi City; Maguindanao, including Cotabato City; North Cotabato; and Sultan Kudarat.

The foregoing apportionment shall not be considered a precedent in connection with the reapportionment of repre­ sentative districts for the regular National Assembly under Section 2, Article VIII and Section 6. Article XVII of the Constitution.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the number of regional representatives for any region shall not be less than the number of representative districts therein existing at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. There are also allotted two additional seats for regional representatives to Region IV in view of inhabitants, such as students, in the region not taken into account in the 1975 census.

SEC. 13. Sectoral representatives.—There shall be three sectors to be represented in the interim Batasang Pam- bansa, namely: (1) youth; (2) agricultural labor; and (3) industrial labor to be elected in the manner herein provided. Each sector shall be entitled to four sectoral representa­ tives, two of whom shall come from Luzon, one from Visayas, and one from Mindanao: Provided, That the youth sector shall be entitled to two additional sectoral representatives who shall be elected from any region.

The Bohol Provincial Library gives this detail on its Facebook page:
April 7, 1978, elections were held for members of the Interim Batasang Pambansa, known as Mambabatas Pambansa or Assemblymen. They were elected per region, through a bloc-voting system. This election was held on President Ferdinand E. Marcos’s lucky number, the number 7.

The Interim Batasang Pambansa (IBP) served as a transitional legislative body mandated by the 1973 Constitution as the Philippines shifted from a presidential to a semi-presidential form of government.

The members of the Interim Batasang Pambansa elected in Region VII were: Natalio B. Bacalso, Bartolome C. Cabangbang, Eutiquio C. Cimafranca, Alfonso N. Corominas, Jr., Hilario Davide, Jr., Filemon L. Fernandez, Jorge M. Kintanar, Valentino L. Legaspi, Mariano R. Logarta, Enrique L. Medina, Jr., Dominador M. Pernes, Jesus L. Villegas, Julian B. Yballe. All belonged to the Pusyon Bisaya party.

Before conducting the first national election under martial law, President Ferdinand E. Marcos implemented a new Election Code of 1978. But the election of April 7, 1978, of 165 regional members of the Interim Batasang Pambansa did not change the authoritarian rule of President Ferdinand E. Marcos. President Marcos formed the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL or New Society Movement) which fielded candidates in all regions, headed by Mrs. Imelda R. Marcos in Metro Manila.

The opposition parties of the past, such as the Liberal Party, boycotted the elections as a meaningless exercise. Only in Metro Manila did an organized opposition contest the elections, led by the Lakas ng Bayan (Laban or People’s Power) star, former Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino, Jr., whose wife, Mrs. Corazon C. Aquino, campaigned while Ninoy was kept in prison. The opposition candidates belonged to the Laban, Nacionalista Party, Pusyon Bisaya, National Union for Liberation and other independent candidates denounced martial law and asked for the restoration of democracy. On election eve, the people in Metro Manila joined in a noise barrage against the government.

The election resulted in the total defeat of the Laban candidates in Metro Manila. Opposition protests of massive vote buying and cheating led to the arrest of its leaders and hundreds of protesters. Only 16 opposition candidates in other parts of the country survived the KBL avalanche. Later, on April 27, 1978, the election of 14 sectoral members of the interim legislature, representing the youth, agricultural and urban workers sectors, was held. The COMELEC announced the results on the same day.

On June 12, 1978, the 80th anniversary of Philippine independence from Spain, the Interim Batasang Pambansa (Provisional National Assembly) held its inaugural session at the newly constructed building on Constitutional Hall, Diliman, Quezon City. Almost all the assemblymen were present, except those from Region XII, where no winning candidates had yet been proclaimed. The oldest member was 82-year-old Pablo Floro of Metro Manila, and the youngest was the 19-year-old Rogelio C. Payuan of Cavite City, a youth sectoral representative. In addition to the 165 elected members, the body had 35 members appointed by the President and 14 sectoral representatives.

However, Marcos as President and prime minister with indefinite tenure dominated the body. He could still legislate by decree, veto measures adopted by the parliament, or dissolve it altogether. In turn, the body could not remove the President-prime minister, ratify treaties, or repeal or change any decree of the President. On July 31, 1978, the members of the IBP elected former Chief Justice Querube C. Makalintal as Speaker.

It should be noted that the first legislative body was the Interim Batasang Pambansa, and it existed from 1978 to 1984. After it bowed out of existence, President Marcos called an election for the members of the regular Batasang Pambansa. This election was held on May 14, 1984. The regular Batasang Pambansa was abolished immediately after the People Power Revolution in 1986, and Congress was restored with the passage of the 1987 Constitution.

Sources and References:
1. Gregorio F. Zaide, Sonia M. Zaide, History of the Republic of the Philippines, Metro Manila, 1983, 1987, pp. 398–399, 406
2. Manuel D. Duldulao, A Century of Philippine Legislature, Experience Philippines, Quezon City, Vol. II, p. 632
3. Presidential Communications Development and Strategic Planning Office (PCDSPO)
4. Wikimedia Commons

In short, Marcos was no ceremonial president in a parliamentary system. I wonder if people who insist that the first Marcos Administration was under a "parliamentary system" (such as Raissa Espinosa-Robles, read here) are willing to prove that the Batasang Pambansa is "proof" that the Philippines was under a parliamentary system. 

To do so, they could start by going to Singapore and Malaysia. Their best source may be Mrs. Robles or anybody who still believes in the lie of a Marcos parliamentary regime. Semi-presidential isn't parliamentary. The Batasang Pambansa was no real parliament

Popular posts from this blog

Wrong Assumption: Those Who Wish to Reform the 1987 Constitution are Automatically Marcos Loyalists and Diehard Duterte Supporters

Orion Perez Dumdum, founder of the CoRRECT Movement was featured in the INQUIRER.net page. It's no surprise that there would be detractors every now and then. Some people still believe that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that were so then why does Article XVII exist that the constitution is open for amendments ? It's no surprise that some idiot alleged that Orion is actually a Marcos supporter. The arguments by the anti-reforms are basically Nom Sequitur and Ad Hominem . The use of personal attacks and illogical conclusions are common argument flaws. In fact, one just needs to understand the poor Filipino logic . I remember all the stupidity going on. It's funny such people accuse me of Ad Hominems while doing Ad Hominems themselves! What I'd like to focus on is the Nom Sequitur. Its definition is: 1 : an inference (see inference sense 1) that does not follow from the premises (see premise entry 1 sense 1) specifically : a fallacy...

BRUTAL Truth: Stop HOPING for Another "PNoy-Like President" Because the Parliamentary System will Produce MUCH BETTER Leaders

Let me get this straight, I'm not here to totally dismiss the good that the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" C. Aquino III did. I'll try to be least biased  when I'm writing this to "give a shock" to those who tend to treat his term as a "magical time". However, I'm going to have to warn people about the problem of looking for "another Messiah leader". Yesterday was the would've been 66th birthday of Noynoy if he were alive. One can talk good about Noynoy's legacy. However, we need to realize that relying on Noynoy's term is a violation of the Mahathir Mohamad principle of "Never stop learning."  We need to think that there's only one Noynoy and when he died, he died . TV-5 reveals that Rep. Edgar Erice, a long-time friend of the late leader, also said the following: Caloocan City 2nd District Rep. Edgar Erice made the remark in a social media post marking Aquino’s 66th birth anniversary.  In the post, he co...

The Three Drug Mules Executed in China Last March 30, 2011

Al Jazeera Today is March 30, 2026. It has been 15 years since the execution of the three drug mules. Their names are Sally Ordinario-Villanueva, Ramon Credo (who was cremated in China shortly after his execution), and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never revealed, perhaps due to the loved ones requesting more privacy). Contrary to what one might think, the three drug mules weren't a trio. Instead, they were three separate cases that just happened to be scheduled to die on the same day.  They weren't a trio. They had a temporary reprieve when  former vice president Jejomar Binay tried to save them . Villanueva, together with Ramon Credo and Elizabeth Batain, was scheduled to be executed last month but got a reprieve after Vice President Jejomar Binay traveled to China and personally appealed to Chinese authorities. BBC   News even gave such a short news report, that I felt compelled to copy/paste the whole time as a reference here: Philippine Vice-President Jejomar Bin...

Justice for Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng

Would you still want to hate to follow rules? Well, it's time to think about the tragic loss of Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng , who lost his life because someone in the road didn't want to follow simple guidelines. It was two days ago when, suddenly, Kington's life was taken away from him. It was difficult for me to process what happened. I would like to share my thoughts of this reckless incident of what happens when laws are ignored. Either you become the victim (for not following rules) or you end up someone who follows rules (like what happened to Kingston). Here's something I found on Facebook : The Price of Paper Laws   Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng was 23. A Monash university graduate, a talented musician, and a cafĂ© owner, he moved back to Cebu to build a life. That life ended on a pedestrian crossing near his home.   A speeding Toyota Innova hit him with such force it threw his body into a utility pole. The driver, 21-year-old Sean Andrew Pajarillo, had already hit a parke...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...