The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-


As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow--a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia--it was really a trial by gossip. In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro. 


I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how could anybody who claimed it was tampered with have even a single proof for that claim Well, that's what the documentary about the Vizconde Massacre revealed. A lot of evidence that pointed to Hubert's innocence was somehow, I dare believe, conveniently ignored. Until now, I still feel something was not right concerning the Vizconde Massacre.

Ramon Tulfo wrote for the Inquirer an article called "A lesson in forgiveness". I would agree that the judge herself, Amelita G. Tolentino, was biased. The article mentioned that Tolentino herself was eyeing a position in the Court of Appeals. Did that desire, if ever, blind the judge? Did the judge have some motive? I can't be too sure but while watching the documentary--I think I would've probably slapped the judge, been sent to jail, and gotten de-barred if I was among Hubert's lead counsel! I even want to say that the judge herself is very maldita which means mean-spirited woman.

Why I felt it was a trial of "Trust Me Bro"

The timeline of the Vizconde Massacre would be as follows. June 29-30, 1991, was when the crime happened. There were also movies such as The Vizconde Massacre Story followed up by The Untold Story: Vizconde Massacre II May The Lord Be With Us. These were screened during the trial. I find this all to be unethical, especially when in 1995, the new suspect, Jessica Alfaro (who frequently wore shades for some reason) appeared. It was when things started to fall into place.

The documentary revealed 142 pieces of evidence ignored. We have Tolentino herself who said that it's not the amount but the quality. Yet, Crime Investigation Asia surely had presented the proof that Tolentino ignored. Tolentino had condemned herself in that statement. Was Tolentino insinuating that Jessica herself was more reliable than the evidence she probably just rejected as an inconvenience? Isn't it protocol to examine every piece of evidence? I guess that's why there was this article from The Philippine Star called "The Tolentino Blunder". It was written nine years before Hubert got acquitted for a crime he could've never committed. It was because Hubert was in America when it all happened. 

Why are Jessica's statements listened to? I guess it's because of how intriguing the story was. Her story was probably very fascinating. Yet, there were several inconsistencies that Crime Investigation Asia's documentary pointed out. I guess people were more interested in hearing what Jessica had to say because it sounded more interesting. In the case of the late Lauro Vizconde, here's a man who's desperate to find out who did the crime. It's sad, really, that Vizconde would die without knowing who was responsible for the crime. That's what Hubert later said that the real murderers must be found! Vizconde still believes the lies Jessica uttered in court. I guess it's because desperation caused him to believe it. I'm sickened at how Jessica's probably still enjoying life out there. Though, Jessica will sooner or later get what's coming to her. 

Why were the 142 pieces of evidence ignored? I guess it's because, facts, unlike gossip, can be very boring. For some students, history is a very boring lesson. People would rather gossip nonsense than study for a history exam. If the judge was in doubt then why not have them examined? How could Tolentino just say that it may have been tampered with if she didn't have it examined? I guess that's why former Philippine justice secretary, Vitaliano N. Aguirre II, walked out. At first, I thought it was an act of disrespect like he did during the impeachment trial of the late Renato Corona. It turns out that Hubert was truly a victim of public outcry and a biased judge as the documentary presented. Any good judge would have complied with protocol. Why not have all 142 pieces of evidence examined before making a verdict? It seemed that the judge pre-judged the case if that's the case!

The outrage can be there. Hubert was really in the States all along when the crime happened. Yet, we have a very biased judge who contradicted herself. We have a man who did nothing wrong arrested and wrongfully arrested for 15 years. I wonder if his wife, whom he met in jail, was also wrongfully accused? I believe that the rest of the people with Hubert were nothing more than fall guys. I'm glad Hubert is out of jail. Yet, the fight isn't over. One must question where are the real killers. One must question why was this gross injustice allowed to happen? 

When Hubert later gets involved in the premiere of a similar case


Later on, Hubert appeared in the 2012 premiere of Give Up Tomorrow. It's because, like the Vizconde Case, the real murderers of Jacqueline and Marijoy were never found. It turns out that Juan Francisco Gonzales Larranaga aka Paco was in Quezon City in Manila during the night of the crime. It shocked me to no end to learn that Paco was innocent of that crime. Sure, Paco did have some previous cases such as the fight in the parking lot. Yet, nothing changes the fact that Paco and seven others were wrongfully arrested, one of them (according to the documentary) was actually tortured, and it wasn't a fair trial. Hubert knows what it's like to be wrongfully accused.

Hubert had his Christmas gift on December 10, 2010. I'm glad that Hubert is among others who are speaking against being wrongfully accused. It's no wonder why cries for the abolition of the death penalty are there. I may be for the death penalty but I agree that wrongful executions can happen. I agree with some of those who want it abolished because the wrong people can get executed as well. The problem is with the judicial system which is why I'm not in a hurry to get the death penalty back. Though, I want to see it restored and reserved only for wicked authority figures who misuse the law. I'm glad Hubert and the others wrongfully accused were released. Now, one must wonder who masterminded their frame-up? Where are the real killers now? I could dare say that trial by Trust Me Bro may have protected the real perpetrators all this while. 

Unfortunately, some people still ignore the cold-hard facts. The facts stated that Hubert was in the States when the crime happened. Yet, some people still side with the inconsistency of Jessica's testimony. Some still uphold that Tolentino wasn't a biased judge. This case should be a call against trial by Trust Me Bro. 

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more