Would Police-Hating Wokes Dare Call Criminals If Ever They Become Victims of Crime?

I did write about defunding the police a day ago. The big question worth asking to police-hating wokes is what's their justification behind hating police officers? Was it because an abusive police officer and the death of an innocent civilian? We do need to know the function of the police first. Whether those wokes want to admit it or not--the police is just as important as healthcare. In a crime scenario, the police officers apprended the crooks and healthcare takes care of the victims. The police officers might even be required to guard the hospital if ever a high profile victim of a crime is in danger. A vital state witness is protected because the criminal group he or she defected from may want to kill him for her.

Yet, no matter how you try to argue about the function of the police, these guys are going to start screaming all over. I guess not even the American Bar Association can convince them why we need a police force to keep society safe. They woud say stuff like, "You (insert insult), don't you realize you're just as deluded as (insert bad word) would just make things worse. You're as delusional as (insert bad word) if you think policemen will make things better." You may even get comments like, "You know what! I'd rather trust the criminals than the police. It's because the police kills without a reason and criminals kill for a reason." What kind of messed up logic is that?

That's why I'd like to ask those people who want to seriously defund the police, "Are you willing to call criminals if you never need help?" They want to defund the police because of abuses. They want the budget of the police to be allocated them to other functions that need police to defend it. You'd need police officers to apprehend healthcare scams, crime scenes in schools, and to protect houses from thieves. If they start defunding the police then where will good police officers get money to have the equipment to stop criminals? If the criminals started having better weapons than the police--would police-hating wokes call criminals if they get into trouble?

Let's think of this imagined scenario. I had to imagine myself living in San Francisco. The consequences are really bad. I remembered watching a video by Misha Petrov on Youtube. The way that she describes it fills me with disgust. It's a brutal hard truth that needed to be heard. Can you imagine a street full of discarded infected needles, human wastes, crime left and right, and you might want to move away from the place as soon as possible? As a child, I remembered the song "San Francisco" by the late Scott McKenzie. The song is but a memory now because of the defund the police movement. That song made me want to try and see the place. After hearing the current situation, maybe it's about time to abandon the American dream for good.

Who would I call if any of those criminals in San Francisco start breaking into where I stay? I could imagine going on vacation to such a place. No police officers at all. No money to fund the place because of the anti-capitalist mindset. I could imagine walking in San Francisco with all the crime worse than what I encounter daily in the Philippines. I'd probably be a lot more scared because of drug tourism. I would totally say, "Who can I call if a druggie hits me? Call another druggie?" That's the price of not having rules, right? Yet, I'm meeting people who say stuff like they'd rather end their lives than follow rules. I guess some people enjoy the chaos even if they have to endure the smell of human waste left and right, discarded needles here and there, instead of having a safe, orderly place.

Because of the absence of cops, we can see how places like San Francisco and California are really that bad. The scene of Disney's Pinocchio where Pleasure Island soon got vandalized ot the max comes to my mind. People are making jackasses out of themselves in the symbolic sense. Consequences will eventually be worse than what Disney's Pinocchio. Sure, the idea of people turning into literal donkeys is just fiction. However, I'd rather turn into a literal donkey and be useful in the salt mines than to become a jackass of no use.

If their logic was to defund the police due to a bad police officer then here's what. They need to defund other sectors such as healthcare and housing. Would they want to defund healthcare because a healthcare authority abused his or her authority? Would they want to defund housing because a zoning regulator abused his or her authority? These people like police officers, healthcare authority, and housing authority also have rules to follow. If they fail to follow the job assigned to them--isn't it time to remove them from their jobs?

Also, a police officer who was broken the law should no longer be viewed as a police officer. A police officer who's broken the law is a law breaker--not to be viewed as a law enforcer. By their logic, any police officer who breaks the law should be trusted because that police officer has become a criminal. A police officer who commits murder now "kills for a reason" because he or she is already best considered a criminal. I guess they'll call the bad police officers for help them. If not, they've further proven themselves contradictory when they'll refuse to embrace a bad police officer, a person best viewed as a criminal.

Comments

Wrong Assumption: Those Who Wish to Reform the 1987 Constitution are Automatically Marcos Loyalists and Diehard Duterte Supporters

Orion Perez Dumdum, founder of the CoRRECT Movement was featured in the INQUIRER.net page. It's no surprise that there would be detractors every now and then. Some people still believe that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that were so then why does Article XVII exist that the constitution is open for amendments ? It's no surprise that some idiot alleged that Orion is actually a Marcos supporter. The arguments by the anti-reforms are basically Nom Sequitur and Ad Hominem . The use of personal attacks and illogical conclusions are common argument flaws. In fact, one just needs to understand the poor Filipino logic . I remember all the stupidity going on. It's funny such people accuse me of Ad Hominems while doing Ad Hominems themselves! What I'd like to focus on is the Nom Sequitur. Its definition is: 1 : an inference (see inference sense 1) that does not follow from the premises (see premise entry 1 sense 1) specifically : a fallacy

Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, the Only Constitution That Institutionalizes, "Public Office is a Public Trust"?

It's time to revisit one of the favorite people for people against constitutional amendments or reforms, namely Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (read here ). Yes, the same guy who was also related by marriage to Mrs. Thelma Jimenea-Chiong. Davide's school of thought is in the "uniqueness" of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines as if it's the "best constitution in the world". Davide would mention that the 1987 Constitution is the only one he knows would be the best. A shame really that Davide himself, like Kishore Mahbubani, was once a United Nations representative, and he's saying such stuff. Article XI of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines writes this in Section 1: Section 1. Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must, at all times, be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency; act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives. Okay, I get it. However

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it ), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late. Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this: It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is

Are People Who Say Systems Don't Matter Be Willing to Prove Their Claims for a Million Pesos?

People often argue that it's not the system but the people who run it. Some people have their examples like the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III and former Philippine vice president Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo. They would say that both Noynoy and Leni are "prime examples" why charter change isn't needed, just a change of people in power. Some people even say that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that's so then what happened to Article XVII that makes it open to amendments? Why wasn't that even used? That means even making a new constitution isn't illegal per se--unless one did what Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. did during the martial law era! However, if we understand simple psychological science, we need to look at basic psychology. Please, I don't need a doctorate in certain degrees, in the Greenbelt Universities, to understand that there are mist

The Happy Aborigines Taiwanese Song

While looking for an Aborigine song that gave me an earworm--I found this interesting aboriginal song. By looking at this video, I suspect that this song is actually a love song between a man and a woman,. It does sound very Ifugao-like as well.

"Give Up Tomorrow" Deleted Scene: The Safehouse Where the Crime Supposedly Took Place

Give Up Tomorrow has been an interesting documentary. Why I was fascinated by it because of how it shook my mind. It turned out that it was a trial by publicity . It was also at that time when The Calvento Files aired a dramatization of Davidson Rusia's testimony. As Cebu City Vice Mayor Raymond Alvin Garcia said, it was a very unpopular move. People already thought Juan Francisco G. Larrañaga aka Paco (and the seven others) were guilty. People thought Davidson's story was worth believing. Some deleted scenes never made it into the final cut This deleted scene talks about the owner of the place where the crime allegedly happened. David Gurkan now recalls his experience. According to Davidson, this was the story as recorded by the Supreme Court of the Philippines: From the evidence of the prosecution, there is no doubt that all the appellants conspired in the commission of the crimes charged. Their concerted actions point to their joint purpose and community of intent. Well se

The Curious Case of Dayang Dayang, Not Dayang Daya

I remembered the song "Dayang Dayang" which had a parody cover called "Dayang Daya". Some people wondered if it was from India. Some say it was a Muslim song which makes more sense. It's because the beats almost sound like one from Filipino Muslim dances. Granted, a lot of Filipinos descended from either Malaysian or Indonesian settlers then it would make sense if Dayang Dayang is danced to the Pakiring. The song I just share comes from an Indonesian singer who probably popularized the song. Many words from the Filipino language match up with Malaysian language or Indonesian language. The Filipino word for help (tulong) is tolong in Indonesian and Malaysian. The Malaysian (or Indonesian) term Dayang is said to mean a noble lady. It would make sense of the song "Dayang Dayang" would've come from Indonesia, Malaysia, or from Mindanao in the Philippines. This was the most common version heard. I think the video maker wrongly attributed it to Bollywo

The Chiong Sisters Case Muddled by the Philippines' RAMBUNCTIOUS PRESS?

Here's a clip of the late Carlos P. Celdran and Teddy Boy Locsin Jr. from Michael Collins' YouTube channel. Until now, I still wonder if the director of that awful film Animal (2004) namely Federico "Toto" Natividad Jr. was also there during the Cinemalaya premiere. The film Animal (2004) was once entitled Butakal: Sugapa sa Laman in 1999, meaning Male Pig: Drunkard in Body . This clip talks about just how the whole media frenzy caused a double miscarriage of justice. Celdran, a known reformist and vocal anti-Duterte critic, voiced out the unethical making of a Maalaala Mo Kaya episode. Did I miss something back in the 1990s? All I remember was broadcasting an episode in The Calvento Files. Until now, the ABS-CBN YouTube channel hasn't uploaded it. How both Marty Syjuco and Collins got some clips of the film isn't specifically said. I believe Marty and Michael went to the late Tony Calvento, asked for his permission, and were given permission. I believe tha

The Late Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino Should've Remained a National Symbol of Unity Even After EDSA 1986

Well, it's time for another today in history entry, right? I was trying to set up a WordPress site (which might be experimental at best, for now) and it's in. WordPress is that hard to use for someone like me. Back on topic, I was tagged to a post on Facebook on ABS-CBN News Facebook page. It's no surprise that I read people's comments can be very stupid . Some keep talking like, "The 1987 Constitution is the best in the world." or "Change the people. Not the constitution." Please, if that were true why was it that the defective 1973 pseudo-parliamentary government of the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. (and I wrote a rebuttal why it isn't ) had to be replaced with another constitution . Sadly, the 1987 Constitution was written almost in such a hurry which created a lot of mistakes. The events of EDSA reveal this detail about the late Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino. It was that Mrs. Aquino was hiding in a convent in Cebu at that time . In short, M

Very Easy to Say, "I'm Sure!' and Be Wrong, Am I Right?

I guess that foolish old man did the right thing to block me on social media. The old man remained incorrigible while having his toga display, apparently getting a doctorate. An earlier post I wrote was about the misuse and abuse of CTTO . I even wonder who in the world is Merkado CTTO? It's very easy to use CTTO to look smart. However, real studies need more than CTTO but several sources. It should be several valid sources and not just sources you agree with. I was laughing at this old man in a toga (who has thankfully blocked me after I tried to refute his errors as a nobody ) who tends to use CTTO. I think he was also fond of saying, "I'm sure!" and then it ends up with several stupid claims. Such people would be in what might be best called the MARITES Pyramid of Learning (read here ). These people's best sources can be summarized as "Trust me bro" or "Just trust me". In the case of the meme I made, the peak of the pyramid is, "Jus

A Business Graduate's Random Blog on History and Gossip

Search This Blog