Skip to main content

Would Police-Hating Wokes Dare Call Criminals If Ever They Become Victims of Crime?


I did write about defunding the police a day ago. The big question worth asking to police-hating wokes is what's their justification behind hating police officers? Was it because an abusive police officer and the death of an innocent civilian? We do need to know the function of the police first. Whether those wokes want to admit it or not--the police is just as important as healthcare. In a crime scenario, the police officers apprended the crooks and healthcare takes care of the victims. The police officers might even be required to guard the hospital if ever a high profile victim of a crime is in danger. A vital state witness is protected because the criminal group he or she defected from may want to kill him for her. 

Yet, no matter how you try to argue about the function of the police, these guys are going to start screaming all over. I guess not even the American Bar Association can convince them why we need a police force to keep society safe. They woud say stuff like, "You (insert insult), don't you realize you're just as deluded as (insert bad word) would just make things worse. You're as delusional as (insert bad word) if you think policemen will make things better." You may even get comments like, "You know what! I'd rather trust the criminals than the police. It's because the police kills without a reason and criminals kill for a reason." What kind of messed up logic is that?

That's why I'd like to ask those people who want to seriously defund the police, "Are you willing to call criminals if you never need help?" They want to defund the police because of abuses. They want the budget of the police to be allocated them to other functions that need police to defend it. You'd need police officers to apprehend healthcare scams, crime scenes in schools, and to protect houses from thieves. If they start defunding the police then where will good police officers get money to have the equipment to stop criminals? If the criminals started having better weapons than the police--would police-hating wokes call criminals if they get into trouble?

Let's think of this imagined scenario. I had to imagine myself living in San Francisco. The consequences are really bad. I remembered watching a video by Misha Petrov on Youtube. The way that she describes it fills me with disgust. It's a brutal hard truth that needed to be heard. Can you imagine a street full of discarded infected needles, human wastes, crime left and right, and you might want to move away from the place as soon as possible? As a child, I remembered the song "San Francisco" by the late Scott McKenzie. The song is but a memory now because of the defund the police movement. That song made me want to try and see the place. After hearing the current situation, maybe it's about time to abandon the American dream for good.

Who would I call if any of those criminals in San Francisco start breaking into where I stay? I could imagine going on vacation to such a place. No police officers at all. No money to fund the place because of the anti-capitalist mindset. I could imagine walking in San Francisco with all the crime worse than what I encounter daily in the Philippines. I'd probably be a lot more scared because of drug tourism. I would totally say, "Who can I call if a druggie hits me? Call another druggie?" That's the price of not having rules, right? Yet, I'm meeting people who say stuff like they'd rather end their lives than follow rules. I guess some people enjoy the chaos even if they have to endure the smell of human waste left and right, discarded needles here and there, instead of having a safe, orderly place. 

Because of the absence of cops, we can see how places like San Francisco and California are really that bad. The scene of Disney's Pinocchio where Pleasure Island soon got vandalized ot the max comes to my mind. People are making jackasses out of themselves in the symbolic sense. Consequences will eventually be worse than what Disney's Pinocchio. Sure, the idea of people turning into literal donkeys is just fiction. However, I'd rather turn into a literal donkey and be useful in the salt mines than to become a jackass of no use. 

If their logic was to defund the police due to a bad police officer then here's what. They need to defund other sectors such as healthcare and housing. Would they want to defund healthcare because a healthcare authority abused his or her authority? Would they want to defund housing because a zoning regulator abused his or her authority? These people like police officers, healthcare authority, and housing authority also have rules to follow. If they fail to follow the job assigned to them--isn't it time to remove them from their jobs?

Also, a police officer who was broken the law should no longer be viewed as a police officer. A police officer who's broken the law is a law breaker--not to be viewed as a law enforcer. By their logic, any police officer who breaks the law should be trusted because that police officer has become a criminal. A police officer who commits murder now "kills for a reason" because he or she is already best considered a criminal. I guess they'll call the bad police officers for help them. If not, they've further proven themselves contradictory when they'll refuse to embrace a bad police officer, a person best viewed as a criminal. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...
Read more

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...
Read more

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...
Read more

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...
Read more

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...
Read more