Skip to main content

Better Think Twice Before Defunding the Police

There are stupid people on Facebook who always say, "Defund the police!" Think about defunding the police? Well, this video from San Francisco shows just how "wonderful" society can get when you defund the police. The call to defund the police has been called because of abusive cops. I'm not going to deny that there are abusive cops. However, the profession of a policeman as well as the government having the function of police is another. Are we going to abolish the government entirely because of some corrupt politicians? 

We need to get the facts straight about what happens when the police is defunded. Those who are calling to abolish the police have no idea what they're getting themselves into. Yet, we've got fools such as the gossiping Facebook page, the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (which I heard is spearheaded by a bitter youth and some rebellious youths) even made this very stupid diagram...

And then they wonder why peace and order is so bad....

The police are needed to protect all the cups. Don't tell me we don't need cops to protect our schools, healthcare centers, youth service centers, housing, and other community reinvestments? I bet the founder of PALF isn't just a bitter fellow--he's probably a guy who hates to follow rules. It was said by Vladimir Lenin that the best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals. Defunding the police because of an abusive cop  is as dumb as (1) defunding education because of an abusive teacher, (2) defund universal healthcare because of an abusive healthcare worker, (3) defund youth services because of an abusive youth service leader, (4) defund housing because a housing company failed to follow government standards, and (5) defund other community reinvestments if ever those in charge of it are abusive. 

I could even remember some person no Facebook said that he would rather trust the criminals than the police officers. The reason was because criminals kill for a reason while the police officers kill without a reason. Such a logic is baffling. If that's their logic then why not trust those police officers they cited who broke the law? Any police officer who's broken the law should be eligible for removal of position and given appropriate punishment. A police officer who breaks the law should hand over his or her badge, go to jail, and be put to jail alongside his or her fellow criminals. I would trust good police officers over bad police officers. In short, I would trust any person worthy of the title of police officer while regarding bad police officers as criminals.

Looks like some people in San Francisco are now getting a rude awakening. Without police officers, the whole place is a mess. Those criminals are no better than the abusive police officers. So much for saying that they'd rather trust the criminal than policemen. The situation there's so bad that if I were an American--I'd really stay away from San Francisco. As a Filipino, I'd stay away from places in the Philippines where I know crime is rampant. 

Try to blame capitalism on this but these are idiot wokes left and right ruining th eplace. I personally am revolted just thinking about human waste on the streets, all the needles, crime, and because of what? Thank defund the police for that! Those who want ot defund the police might as well be ready for the tragic consequences.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Okay, We've Heard These Wise Words by the Late Luis V. Teodoro, But Ever Heard of His Words About th PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM?!

There's nothing wrong with complaining. Complaining can be counterproductive. However, the problem with the likes of Butthurt Philippines (where I got the quote above) is that they'd rather stick to complaining than get the solutions. Even worse, it seems that the administrator of the Butthurt Philippines Facebook page is that he'd rather look at me as some "DDS troll". Is that the best answer that its owner, who I heard is Lico Reloj (if that's his real name) could even come up with? They'd dismiss me because I'm part of the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum. I've been insulted for my supposed poor ability in detecting sarcasm. Maybe I should've researched word elongation to detect sarcasm. However, with the way Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page carries things--I doubt it that it's productive complaining.  The quote by the late Luis V. Teodoro is right. I was reminded of why I wanted to move out of the Philippines. I always fel...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pol Pot's Brutal Regime May Be Summarized by "Hating Everyone Better Than Him"

Documentation Center of Cambodia Archives Two days ago, on April 17, 1975, marked the 50th year since Pol Pot (real name, Saloth Sar) rose to power. The Khmer Rouge only ruled for four years, but it showed one thing--a reign of less than six years isn't necessarily benevolent (read here ). A look at Pol Pot's past may show that he was the typical inggitero--the Filipino word for someone who's easily jealous of others! The History website reveals this brutal detail on Pol Pot's regime, which was most likely fueled by jealousy : Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. During that time, an estimated 1.5 to 2 million Cambodians died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. One detention center, S-21, was so notorious that only seven of the roughly 20,000 people imprisoned there are known to have survived. The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless communist society, took particular ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is an Impeachment Just as Effective as a Vote of No Confidence?

Talks about impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio are on. However, I'd like to show the problem with the impeachment trial. Who can remember when former president Joseph Marcelo Ejercito aka Joseph Estrada was under impeachment trial? One can say that when Estrada resigned,  that proved that it doesn't matter if the country is presidential or parliamentary (since some economic powerhouses are still under the  presidential system, like South Korea and Taiwan). However, we need to look at the political aspect of the parliamentary system. Is impeachment just as effective as a vote of no confidence? Let's find out! What is impeachment? Impeachment is defined by the Britannica as follows: Impeachment, in common law, a proceeding instituted by a legislative body to address serious misconduct by a public official . In Great Britain the House of Commons serves as prosecutor and the House of Lords as judge in an impeachment proceeding. In the federal government of ...
Post a Comment
Read more