Skip to main content

Boomers Resistant to Change are Annoying Cavemen Stuck in the Past


This is one topic I felt like I wanted to write down here. It's all about the boomer generation with people resistant to change. Boomers are typically born from 1946 to 1964. Having been a millennial (born 1991-1996) meant there were changes that would happen. Some things that are common today were luxuries yesterday. It was during the 1990s to early 2000s. I could remember being stuck with some obsolete technology back in the 2000s. It was a real challenge (actually) since I had to deal with a lot of boomers. A lot of boomers held the seats of authority. They can be parents, uncles, aunties, caretakers, and teachers just to name a few.

I remembered wanting to have a personal computer. It was rather a convenient tool actually. I simply wanted to have that PC because it made encoding easier. What would the typical boomers say? Well, they say, "Back in our day, we had a typewriter so stop complaining and use the typewriter just like we did!" Then they get mad when the typewritten report was haphazardly done. I remembered how the typewriter hurt my fingers then I was told in vernacular, "You're just lazy! Just do it! Stay up late! It can't hurt and wouldn't kill you!" Seriously? It wasn't until I had a PC (but was stuck with a dying PC) that I was able to do work better. Yet back then, a PC was mighty expensive and the Internet would take away the dial tone. Today, I could receive calls while typing this entry!

The Internet went all the way from a luxury to a necessity. I remembered wanting to get a Digital Subscriber Line (DSL). What kind of response was easily there? It's typical to say, "Back in our day... we lived without Internet. Stop being a whiner and get used to dial-up!" Dial-up was becoming more and more obsolete. Dial-up cards were becoming a thing of the past during that time. Yet, some people back then were still arguing about not getting the DSL because it was "so expensive".  Even if people can tell stuff like, "As you see, the benefit of the DSL is that we can use the Internet while you use the phone." They'll argue how much cheaper it is to just take turns. Never mind that the business world today is now more Internet reliant than ever.

Dealing with a housekeeper who was so resistant to change was very annoying. She was offered to replace her obsolete, dying light bulb with a new one. She just kept complaining and complaining about new technology. She was offered a better iron and she complained. I guess it's because she was from the province or what? Granted, she's a typical boomer so it's a real problem. It was so hard to convince her how it works better. She was just saying it in Visayan, "We were already used to it!" She also had the bad habit of saying in Visayan, "If it's bitter then just add sugar to it." 

Maybe, the same can be true about renewable energy and solar lights. Sadly, it's a very common thing when some boomers will brag they were able to do without it. Again, the "back in our day" talk. They could talk about the use of petroleum lamps. Back in the 1990s, I remembered having petroleum lamps during Typhoon Ruping. However, we were condemned to utter darkness during the night because we had to turn them off. Are they really that proud of the stench of the petroleum lamps which are fire hazards? Would they rather condemn themselves to darkness than accept new technology? I was even asking if they ever enjoyed being in such extreme inconvenience

I think the same can be for education. Some people had their degrees at age 19 to 20 years old. I was always getting intimidated when people say they got into the business at only 19-20 years old and married in their early 20s. It reminds me of how the Philippines was stuck with K+10 for a very long time. After six years of grade school, we had four years of high school. I remembered complaining day in and day out high school was tough. However, some boomers will always say, "Well, back in our day." Yeah, I get it all right. Yet, the big issue is that they don't realize lessons have to get harder for a reason. They don't realize that what they learned would be considered outdated today. Can you imagine if famous mathematicians such as Isaac Newton were never born? Without Newtonian calculus, I will never be able to enjoy the evolution of technology.

Even worse is if these boomers had a good track record in an outdated educational system. While reading From Third World to First--I was reminded of the late Lee Kuan Yew's observation of China's outdated education system. What's the use of being a valedictorian if the books in your school are so nineteen-forgotten? Reading about how academic textbooks were left obsolete because of Mao Zedong's rule was one. It's a good thing that Deng Xiaoping decided to upgrade the Chinese education system. The massive change in education was also part of China's real Great Leap Forward. It wasn't just Deng's introduction of free markets. It was also that Deng upgraded the education system.

It's no wonder why some businesses will fail. It's because traditional methods aren't always going to work. If your business booms then the more you need technology. Today, we've got Foodpanda and Grab to do delivery services. I couldn't imagine what if some restaurants never upgraded. I couldn't imagine the unthinkable mess it'd have. Can you imagine if a restaurant refuses to upgrade its comfort rooms, kitchens, and whatever they need to upgrade? It'd become a very horrible place that will not be inviting to customers. If they keep using outdated cash registers--can they really give receipts properly to customers? Yet, the founders will still want to brag, "Back in our day." Okay, I get it but isn't it that their glory days are over?

I'm no saying we should forget the lessons of the past. History is a lesson we should all learn from. It's one thing to learn from history. It's another thing to get stuck in the past. We learn about scientific updates to appreciate what we have today. We learn about Louis Pasteur's discovery. However, we allowed Pasteur's discovery to develop into better vaccines than what he had. Pasteur was a man who embraced change. Some people who mocked him didn't. Some boomers are probably too stuck with the past. Fortunately, some boomers are becoming more accepting of change while giving wise caution about what not to do. 

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...