Skip to main content

Boomers Resistant to Change are Annoying Cavemen Stuck in the Past


This is one topic I felt like I wanted to write down here. It's all about the boomer generation with people resistant to change. Boomers are typically born from 1946 to 1964. Having been a millennial (born 1991-1996) meant there were changes that would happen. Some things that are common today were luxuries yesterday. It was during the 1990s to early 2000s. I could remember being stuck with some obsolete technology back in the 2000s. It was a real challenge (actually) since I had to deal with a lot of boomers. A lot of boomers held the seats of authority. They can be parents, uncles, aunties, caretakers, and teachers just to name a few.

I remembered wanting to have a personal computer. It was rather a convenient tool actually. I simply wanted to have that PC because it made encoding easier. What would the typical boomers say? Well, they say, "Back in our day, we had a typewriter so stop complaining and use the typewriter just like we did!" Then they get mad when the typewritten report was haphazardly done. I remembered how the typewriter hurt my fingers then I was told in vernacular, "You're just lazy! Just do it! Stay up late! It can't hurt and wouldn't kill you!" Seriously? It wasn't until I had a PC (but was stuck with a dying PC) that I was able to do work better. Yet back then, a PC was mighty expensive and the Internet would take away the dial tone. Today, I could receive calls while typing this entry!

The Internet went all the way from a luxury to a necessity. I remembered wanting to get a Digital Subscriber Line (DSL). What kind of response was easily there? It's typical to say, "Back in our day... we lived without Internet. Stop being a whiner and get used to dial-up!" Dial-up was becoming more and more obsolete. Dial-up cards were becoming a thing of the past during that time. Yet, some people back then were still arguing about not getting the DSL because it was "so expensive".  Even if people can tell stuff like, "As you see, the benefit of the DSL is that we can use the Internet while you use the phone." They'll argue how much cheaper it is to just take turns. Never mind that the business world today is now more Internet reliant than ever.

Dealing with a housekeeper who was so resistant to change was very annoying. She was offered to replace her obsolete, dying light bulb with a new one. She just kept complaining and complaining about new technology. She was offered a better iron and she complained. I guess it's because she was from the province or what? Granted, she's a typical boomer so it's a real problem. It was so hard to convince her how it works better. She was just saying it in Visayan, "We were already used to it!" She also had the bad habit of saying in Visayan, "If it's bitter then just add sugar to it." 

Maybe, the same can be true about renewable energy and solar lights. Sadly, it's a very common thing when some boomers will brag they were able to do without it. Again, the "back in our day" talk. They could talk about the use of petroleum lamps. Back in the 1990s, I remembered having petroleum lamps during Typhoon Ruping. However, we were condemned to utter darkness during the night because we had to turn them off. Are they really that proud of the stench of the petroleum lamps which are fire hazards? Would they rather condemn themselves to darkness than accept new technology? I was even asking if they ever enjoyed being in such extreme inconvenience

I think the same can be for education. Some people had their degrees at age 19 to 20 years old. I was always getting intimidated when people say they got into the business at only 19-20 years old and married in their early 20s. It reminds me of how the Philippines was stuck with K+10 for a very long time. After six years of grade school, we had four years of high school. I remembered complaining day in and day out high school was tough. However, some boomers will always say, "Well, back in our day." Yeah, I get it all right. Yet, the big issue is that they don't realize lessons have to get harder for a reason. They don't realize that what they learned would be considered outdated today. Can you imagine if famous mathematicians such as Isaac Newton were never born? Without Newtonian calculus, I will never be able to enjoy the evolution of technology.

Even worse is if these boomers had a good track record in an outdated educational system. While reading From Third World to First--I was reminded of the late Lee Kuan Yew's observation of China's outdated education system. What's the use of being a valedictorian if the books in your school are so nineteen-forgotten? Reading about how academic textbooks were left obsolete because of Mao Zedong's rule was one. It's a good thing that Deng Xiaoping decided to upgrade the Chinese education system. The massive change in education was also part of China's real Great Leap Forward. It wasn't just Deng's introduction of free markets. It was also that Deng upgraded the education system.

It's no wonder why some businesses will fail. It's because traditional methods aren't always going to work. If your business booms then the more you need technology. Today, we've got Foodpanda and Grab to do delivery services. I couldn't imagine what if some restaurants never upgraded. I couldn't imagine the unthinkable mess it'd have. Can you imagine if a restaurant refuses to upgrade its comfort rooms, kitchens, and whatever they need to upgrade? It'd become a very horrible place that will not be inviting to customers. If they keep using outdated cash registers--can they really give receipts properly to customers? Yet, the founders will still want to brag, "Back in our day." Okay, I get it but isn't it that their glory days are over?

I'm no saying we should forget the lessons of the past. History is a lesson we should all learn from. It's one thing to learn from history. It's another thing to get stuck in the past. We learn about scientific updates to appreciate what we have today. We learn about Louis Pasteur's discovery. However, we allowed Pasteur's discovery to develop into better vaccines than what he had. Pasteur was a man who embraced change. Some people who mocked him didn't. Some boomers are probably too stuck with the past. Fortunately, some boomers are becoming more accepting of change while giving wise caution about what not to do. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wrong Assumption: Those Who Wish to Reform the 1987 Constitution are Automatically Marcos Loyalists and Diehard Duterte Supporters

Orion Perez Dumdum, founder of the CoRRECT Movement was featured in the INQUIRER.net page. It's no surprise that there would be detractors every now and then. Some people still believe that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that were so then why does Article XVII exist that the constitution is open for amendments ? It's no surprise that some idiot alleged that Orion is actually a Marcos supporter. The arguments by the anti-reforms are basically Nom Sequitur and Ad Hominem . The use of personal attacks and illogical conclusions are common argument flaws. In fact, one just needs to understand the poor Filipino logic . I remember all the stupidity going on. It's funny such people accuse me of Ad Hominems while doing Ad Hominems themselves! What I'd like to focus on is the Nom Sequitur. Its definition is: 1 : an inference (see inference sense 1) that does not follow from the premises (see premise entry 1 sense 1) specifically : a fallacy

Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, the Only Constitution That Institutionalizes, "Public Office is a Public Trust"?

  It's time to revisit one of the favorite people for people against constitutional amendments or reforms, namely Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (read here ). Yes, the same guy who was also related by marriage to Mrs. Thelma Jimenea-Chiong. Davide's school of thought is in the "uniqueness" of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines as if it's the "best constitution in the world". Davide would mention that the 1987 Constitution is the only one he knows would be the best. A shame really that Davide himself, like Kishore Mahbubani, was once a United Nations representative, and he's saying such stuff.  Article XI of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines writes this in Section 1: Section 1. Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must, at all times, be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency; act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives. Okay, I get it. However

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

  People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it ), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late.  Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this: It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is

Are People Who Say Systems Don't Matter Be Willing to Prove Their Claims for a Million Pesos?

People often argue that it's not the system but the people who run it. Some people have their examples like the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III and former Philippine vice president Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo. They would say that both Noynoy and Leni are "prime examples" why charter change isn't needed, just a change of people in power. Some people even say that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that's so then what happened to Article XVII that makes it open to amendments? Why wasn't that even used? That means even making a new constitution isn't illegal per se--unless one did what Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. did during the martial law era! However, if we understand simple psychological science, we need to look at basic psychology. Please, I don't need a doctorate in certain degrees, in the Greenbelt Universities, to understand that there are mist

The Happy Aborigines Taiwanese Song

  While looking for an Aborigine song that gave me an earworm--I found this interesting aboriginal song. By looking at this video, I suspect that this song is actually a love song between a man and a woman,. It does sound very Ifugao-like as well. 

"Give Up Tomorrow" Deleted Scene: The Safehouse Where the Crime Supposedly Took Place

Give Up Tomorrow has been an interesting documentary. Why I was fascinated by it because of how it shook my mind. It turned out that it was a trial by publicity . It was also at that time when The Calvento Files aired a dramatization of Davidson Rusia's testimony. As Cebu City Vice Mayor Raymond Alvin Garcia said, it was a very unpopular move. People already thought Juan Francisco G. Larrañaga aka Paco (and the seven others) were guilty. People thought Davidson's story was worth believing. Some deleted scenes never made it into the final cut  This deleted scene talks about the owner of the place where the crime allegedly happened. David Gurkan now recalls his experience. According to Davidson, this was the story as recorded by the Supreme Court of the Philippines:  From the evidence of the prosecution, there is no doubt that all the appellants conspired in the commission of the crimes charged. Their concerted actions point to their joint purpose and community of intent. Well se

The Curious Case of Dayang Dayang, Not Dayang Daya

I remembered the song "Dayang Dayang" which had a parody cover called "Dayang Daya". Some people wondered if it was from India. Some say it was a Muslim song which makes more sense. It's because the beats almost sound like one from Filipino Muslim dances. Granted, a lot of Filipinos descended from either Malaysian or Indonesian settlers then it would make sense if Dayang Dayang is danced to the Pakiring. The song I just share comes from an Indonesian singer who probably popularized the song.  Many words from the Filipino language match up with Malaysian language or Indonesian language. The Filipino word for help (tulong) is tolong in Indonesian and Malaysian. The Malaysian (or Indonesian) term Dayang is said to mean a noble lady. It would make sense of the song "Dayang Dayang" would've come from Indonesia, Malaysia, or from Mindanao in the Philippines.  This was the most common version heard. I think the video maker wrongly attributed it to Bollywo

The Chiong Sisters Case Muddled by the Philippines' RAMBUNCTIOUS PRESS?

Here's a clip of the late Carlos P. Celdran and Teddy Boy Locsin Jr. from Michael Collins' YouTube channel. Until now, I still wonder if the director of that awful film Animal (2004) namely Federico "Toto" Natividad Jr. was also there during the Cinemalaya premiere. The film Animal (2004) was once entitled Butakal: Sugapa sa Laman in 1999, meaning Male Pig: Drunkard in Body . This clip talks about just how the whole media frenzy caused a double miscarriage of justice.   Celdran, a known reformist and vocal anti-Duterte critic, voiced out the unethical making of a Maalaala Mo Kaya episode. Did I miss something back in the 1990s? All I remember was broadcasting an episode in The Calvento Files.  Until now, the ABS-CBN YouTube channel hasn't uploaded it. How both Marty Syjuco and Collins got some clips of the film isn't specifically said. I believe Marty and Michael went to the late Tony Calvento, asked for his permission, and were given permission. I believe tha

The Late Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino Should've Remained a National Symbol of Unity Even After EDSA 1986

Well, it's time for another today in history  entry, right? I was trying to set up a WordPress site (which might be experimental at best, for now) and it's in. WordPress is that hard to use for someone like me. Back on topic, I was tagged to a post on Facebook on ABS-CBN News Facebook page. It's no surprise that I read people's comments can be very stupid . Some keep talking like, "The 1987 Constitution is the best in the world." or "Change the people. Not the constitution." Please, if that were true why was it that the defective 1973 pseudo-parliamentary government of the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. (and I wrote a rebuttal why it isn't ) had to be replaced with another constitution . Sadly, the 1987 Constitution was written almost in such a hurry which created a lot of mistakes.  The events of EDSA reveal this detail about the late Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino. It was that Mrs. Aquino was hiding in a convent in Cebu at that time . In short, M

Very Easy to Say, "I'm Sure!' and Be Wrong, Am I Right?

  I guess that foolish old man did the right thing to block me on social media. The old man remained incorrigible while having his toga display, apparently getting a doctorate.  An earlier post I wrote was about the misuse and abuse of CTTO . I even wonder who in the world is Merkado CTTO? It's very easy to use CTTO to look smart. However, real studies need more than CTTO but several sources. It should be several valid sources and not just sources you agree with. I was laughing at this old man in a toga (who has thankfully blocked me after I tried to refute his errors as a  nobody ) who tends to use CTTO. I think he was also fond of saying, "I'm sure!" and then it ends up with several stupid claims. Such people would be in what might be best called the MARITES Pyramid of Learning (read here ). These people's best sources can be summarized as "Trust me bro" or "Just trust me". In the case of the meme I made, the peak of the pyramid is, "Jus