Does Marty Syjuco Being an "Extended Family Member" of Paco Larrañaga, Invalidate the Whole Film's Content?

-

As the rainy days hit July, as July 16 passed a few days ago, it's hard not to think of one of the greatest miscarriages of justice namely the Chiong Sisters case. Okay, I don't believe that the Chiong sisters are alive because the evidence given is faulty. How many times do people need to be reminded that the two sisters have a youngest daughter named Debbie Jane Chiong-Sia. Poor Debbie is frequently mistaken because of their resemblance. There's even an entire school to prove that Debbie was an elementary student when the crime happened. Also, two sisters-in-law were mistaken to be the late Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I believe that both sisters are already gone. What was amazing was that Give Up Tomorrow came out, I heard from a friend that he was with Paco Larrañaga on July 16, there were records to prove that he was in Manila, yet that evidence was ignored by the regional trial even up to the Supreme Court decision. 

It's easy to say, "Oh, I'm sure it's biased because Marty Syjuco was related to Paco." Some fool even wrote him as a cousin. No, Marty is the younger brother of the husband of Mimi Larrañaga-Syjuco. The film didn't shy away from mentioning that Marty was an "extended family" though Miguel Syjuco is the brother-in-law of Paco, legally speaking. It's really a logical fallacy to immediately reject a source solely because Paco was an extended family member of the producer, Marty.

A statement from Marty himself is rather honest and straightforward:

I first met Paco at my brother's wedding to Mimi, Paco's older sister. Eight years younger than I, he was just a big, overweight kid, and I didn't pay him much attention. Later, when I heard about his arrest and trial, I went on with my life. Part of me figured the courts would sort it out. Another part was so inured to the injustice and corruption that form the background noise of the Philippines, that I, like most Filipinos, was hobbled by fatalism.

After moving to New York and working in film distribution, I began to crave something more meaningful and creative. When Paco's sentence was elevated to death, and I saw the letter from the 35 "unheard witnesses," I knew I was at a crossroads. My own mother had seen Paco in Manila — 300 miles from the scene of the crime — on the day of the murders and had been denied the right to testify in court and corroborate his alibi.

I know some will question my objectivity and intent because Paco is my brother-in-law, but that relationship gave me inside access and perspective. It also opened my eyes to a part of the Philippines that, as one of its beneficiaries, I had ignored.

My family members are mestizos, a group that traditionally benefits from endemic corruption and cronyism. Educated in Canada and the United States, I had lived in a gated community in the Philippines, and I had been naively and willfully ignorant of the poverty all around me — blind even to the thousands of street children who haunt our cities. My clan was well protected by race, political connections and wealth from the worst aspects of our country's deeply flawed system.

It was precisely my comfort in this role, and my perspectives as a political and familial insider, that made me particularly suited — and obligated — to act in Paco's case. I had left the Philippines, but it lived inside me. And I knew I had to return. I love the country and have friends and family there, but I have grown to abhor the fatalism that allows people to turn away from injustice, and that helps the elite control the poor and uneducated.

But even for the elite, the country's poorly paid and ill-trained police are a persistent threat — to be bribed as a first resort, and allowed to escape if that fails. Under political pressure to solve crimes, they commonly charge any vaguely likely suspect. I strongly believe that most of the Philippines' prisoners have been denied due process or are innocent — or both, as we found in Paco's case — and that injustice is facilitated by the media. Once I had believed what I read and saw, but first-hand knowledge made me question so many of my birthright preconceptions and opened not only a sea of skepticism, but an ocean of hope.

Paco Larrañaga is just one among many. And the Philippines is not alone in failing to build the trappings of democracy, including elections, on a solid foundation of impartial institutions, such as independent courts. There are thousands of Pacos around the world, from Egypt to the United States. We are hoping that this film will make not only Filipinos, but people of all nationalities, sit up, pay attention and act.

There was real field research that was done for seven years. It was a difficult project. Again, legally, Marty isn't the brother-in-law of Paco but a brother-in-law in name only. Marty hardly knew Paco like my relatives on my mother's side will hardly know my relatives on my father's side. Marty himself was on the side of the Syjucos. Miguel married into the Larrañaga family through Mimi herself. The only Syjuco who would've known Paco better was the brother-in-law, Miguel. Marty would be the brother of the brother-in-law, which doesn't really make Marty the brother-in-law of Paco, according to the law.

I could discuss the evidence gathered in the film vs. the Supreme Court decision. Sure, somebody can say that he or she read the Supreme Court decision and watched the film then chose to believe in the Supreme Court decision. However, the description given by Marty himself, makes you wonder how good was the decision anyway? Even Winnie Monsod in a deleted scene reacted terribly (read here) because of how badly made it was. I may not like Mrs. Monsod for being anti-reform but she certainly had a point. 

The evidence gathered in the film included 35 witnesses who saw Paco in Manila. If they say that a logbook can be tampered with, they need to prove that claim! There was class attendance and there were photos (backed up with negatives) of Paco in Manila. Was the late incompetent judge, Martin Ocampo's, "I'm sure!" mentality real empirical evidence? If the judge was in doubt, why not have the photos examined to make sure it wasn't a camera trick? Why did the judge even ignore the negatives presented in court? The documentary didn't fail to even show the judge sleeping in court or how the judge dismissed the identity of the body in Carcar. Yet, some people still choose to stay in their comfort zones because "I'm sure it was all made up!" Oh, if they're sure then can they prove it?

Attacking the film solely because Marty was the brother of the brother-in-law is again, an Ad Hominem. They would rely on that Supreme Court decision over the documentary which presented much evidence of Paco's innocence. I could really agree with Philippine Star writer Boo Chanco that the Philippine justice system is in shambles. Why didn't the Supreme Court, at that time, really bother to even realize that Paco and his co-accused, weren't allowed to testify at the Regional Trial Court (RTC)? Can that be proof that Paco was really "guilty beyond reasonable doubt"? 

The several degrees of Jimenea we may have forgotten 

Would it be Hilario Davide Jr. whose wife's middle name is Jimenea, a relative of the mother of the Chiong sisters or Marty who is a brother of the brother-in-law of Paco? I'm amazed that some people still believe in the Supreme Court decision at that time. Which one would be easier to influence the brother of one's brother-in-law or a direct relative by marriage? That certainly would be a good question to raise. Not to mention, the Chiong Case had extreme coverage because Cheryl Jimenea is a sister of Mrs. Thelma Jimenea-Chiong. I'm emphasizing Jimenea because it's several degrees of Jimenea. Not only did Joseph Estrada appoint Davide Jr. but he also worked with Thelma's sister. The court case would've not been so big if it wasn't for Thelma's connections to the Supreme Court (Davide) and her sister as Estrada's personal secretary. 

May I remind people of the temporal boost of power that the Chiong had? It was very faulty that Thelma offered positions to people who could help the case. However, it was really what I'd call a very bad way to cope with the pain. What later happened was that the Chiong parents, the late Dionisio Chiong and Thelma, tried to fight against the screening of the movie Butakal. They weren't rich people so the power boost had to come from a connection. Estrada worked with Cheryl and Davide Jr. was married to someone related to the Jimeneas. It's really very wrong in hindsight. That's why I believe that the process of finding justice got clouded. Marty was right to call it clouding the judicial process. It's sad to hear Mimi admit she sympathized with Thelma when it happened. However, when Thelma started lying about Paco courting Marijoy then something was off. Even the very act of giving a birthday cake to the "star witness" Davidson V. Rusia was very off. Rusia was forced to admit to a crime he never committed as well. Hopefully. Davidson can be found so the truth can come out! 

Speaking of the film Butakal--I think the Larrañagas themselves would've probably had the right to complain too. Paco's parents would've had the right to sue the late Toto Natividad over the film. The late John Regala was asked to parody their son Paco. The whole story was partly based on the narrative of Davidson, a narrative that was put into question. Instead, it was the Chiongs and not the Larrañagas who tried to stop the film from showing. Until now, I do believe that Natividad himself was interviewed. It's possible that a deleted scene featured the film Butakal. However, the focus was kept on the Calvento Files episode, which was featured. 

I'm afraid some people are too used to their comfort zones. That's why I wrote about that it's very easy to say I'm sure and be wrong about it. It's effortless to say I'm sure. It's like, "I'm sure the sun rises from the West." when the sun rises from the East. Saying I'm sure doesn't invalidate a fact nor validate an error. The burden is in the claim. That's why I learned to be careful about saying, "I'm sure that.." because the burden is there when I say it. Can those who say Marty's documentary is automatically wrong because of his extended relation, be sure of it? 

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-
Image
As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow -- a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia --it was really a trial by gossip . In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro.  I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how cou
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more