Skip to main content

Today in History: Revisiting the Late Martin Ocampo's Demise

 

An injustice for one is an injustice for the whole community. What people never thought that in their demand for blood--the wrong people were caught! It turns out that Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga was in Quezon City when the Chiong sisters went missing (read here). On October 7, 1999, the trial judge who had doubts about the body found in the ravine was found dead in Waterfront, Lapu-Lapu. The incident happened while I was still in my second year of high school. There was not much access to the Internet back then nor was it viewed as a necessity, unlike today!

Back then, I felt Ocampo was murdered. There was allegedly some hair sample that was his--probably his mistress. However, forensics expert Dr. Raquel Fortun has concluded it was suicide. Dr. Fortun also showed up in the documentary Give Up Tomorrow which highlights two things--a crime that remains unsolved and how Paco was wrongfully arrested. Paco admitted on Dong Puno Live that he and Josman Aznar have a bad reputation. However, Paco was in Manila on July 16, 1997--that night when the Chiong Sisters went missing!

After an exhaustive and comprehensive re-autopsy on the body of Ocampo, Dr. Raquel del Rosario-Fortun said in her report that Ocampo took his own life inside Room 502 of the Waterfront Hotel in Mactan last Oct. 7.

"Based on available information regarding the circumstances surrounding (Ocampo's) death obtained from the investigation and the autopsy procedures, the injuries sustained are deemed to be self-inflicted and intentional, therefore the manner of death is classified as suicide," Fortun said in the report announced Friday by the Senate committee on justice and human rights.

Sen. Renato Cayetano, who chairs the committee, consequently ordered the Senate inquiry into Ocampo's death closed and terminated.

The Senate panel embarked on the re-autopsy to erase doubts that there was foul play in the death of Ocampo, who hogged the headlines last year for his verdict on the Chiong sisters' rape-slay case.

Cayetano, however, said the inquiry may be reopened if some physical evidence which would tend to disprove the findings of suicide is uncovered later.

The way Dr. Fortun said it in Give Up Tomorrow was this. Was Ocampo coerced to write the note? That's a good question to ask. Another thing Dr. Fortun mentioned was how Ocampo may have slashed himself at those parts, hoping he'd die and he tried something else. It seems Ocampo's guilty conscience had hit him hard. If Ocampo was indeed trying to end his life because of a guilty conscience--chances are he kept missing the vital parts. Eventually, when all else failed, a gun sufficed. So far, it seems nobody was in the room where Ocampo was later found dead.

Ocampo's conscience may have bothered him over these issues brought up in Give Up Tomorrow:

  1. Why did Ocampo choose to deem the identity of the body found in Tan-awan, Carcar, as irrelevant? The body's identity could've provided closure because if it was really one of the Chiong Sisters--it should at least provide closure for the victims' family. 
  2. Why did Ocampo not allow the Chiong 7 to testify? Why was he glued to Davidson Rusia, who by the way, was also not allowed to testify? Not to mention, Davidson had so many inconsistencies in his stories. Was it to get it over and done with.
  3. Why didn't Ocampo hear more of the defense before dismissing it? This includes dismissing pieces of evidence provided by Paco's friends that the lead suspect was indeed in Manila when the crime happened. Why did he just deem the photos manipulated without examining them?
  4. Ocampo was also caught sleeping during hearings. One must wonder did he really listen to all the details? 
  5. After the end of the trial, Ocampo later admitted that the body was doubtful. He also admitted that it wasn't "certain" that there was rape or murder, but he was "certain" that there was kidnapping and illegal detention. 
  6. Did Ocampo attempt to play Pontius Pilate with the crowd? The crowd was already convinced that Paco and his co-accused were the ones who did it. However, it seems that he knew deep within, there was something wrong. Did that nag on his conscience for months to come before he ended his life?
Everything that led to the trial was indeed a circus. As I watched Give Up Tomorrow--there were many missing angles. It's easy to dismiss it because the maker of the documentary was related to Paco by marriage. I read both the Supreme Court decision and the movie (read here). People came up with their conclusions. What might be ignored is that Thelma Jimenea-Chiong was a relative-by-marriage to then chief justice, Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Davide's wife's is Virginia Jimenea Perez! Paco isn't legally related to producer Marty Syjuco. For clarification, Marty is the brother of Mimi Larrañaga-Syjuco's husband Miguel. Marty only met Paco during the wedding and didn't know Paco much either! 

Revisiting the incident, I wonder how would the brain-numbing movie Jacqueline Comes Home  (read review here) handle this scene? The movie didn't mention that the judge committed suicide. As I watched the movie--why wasn't Ocampo's suicide even included at all? The movie could've at least brought it up. The scene where students are debating whether or not the right people are caught (and Paco is simply called Sonny outright in the film) has two sides. Unfortunately, you've got law practitioners who may be oh too beholden to the Supreme Court of the Philippines and say, "The justice system should be trusted. It will never condemn an innocent person." Did they ever read the case of George Stinney--an African American teenager who was wrongfully executed? There are many around the world on death row who have done nothing to deserve the death penalty! 

Ocampo may be dead but there are still many truths needed. Who was the late Dionisio Chiong supposed to testify against before his daughters went missing? Why didn't the police look at the angle that Mr. Chiong's daughters went missing after he was called to testify? Why didn't the judge even bother the validity of the arrests or even the witness? The judge's motives would be hard to look into, especially since he's been too dead to do anything. However, this judge should be a lesson that something's wrong with the Philippine justice system!

Popular posts from this blog

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

  People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it ), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late.  Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this: It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is...

How a Deaf Beethoven, Composed Wonderful Music That Survived Beyond His Grave

  A composer who was deaf? That's really something to think about. Ludwig Van Beethoven gradually lost his hearing. It may have been caused by a lack of knowledge about lead poisoning at that time. The ZME Science gives this interesting detail on how Beethoven coped with his gradual hearing loss: Despite living in pain, Beethoven did not give up. However, he had a helping hand. In order to continue composing and playing music, Beethoven stumbled across a physical phenomenon that is central to hearing: bone conduction . At the time, scientists understood very little about how human hearing works. But despite the fact that his ears left him, he could still hear himself playing music by placing one end of a wooden stick onto his piano and clenching on the other end with his teeth. When notes were struck, the vibrations from the piano were transferred to his jaw, and from there directly to his inner ear. Miraculously, he could hear again! Bone conduction was born. Sound is nothing mor...

Taiwan Aboriginal Culture Park Indigenous Bamboo Dance

This is another bamboo dance done by what I believe are Atayal dancers. The dance steps are very similar to what one might find in Nueva Ecija or any indigenous region of the Philippines. What makes it more appealing to me is the absence of Taiwanese Mandarin in the lyrics. Instead, it's lyrics that would sound like the chanting of Filipino indigenous dancers. There are similar yet different movements between Taiwanese aborigines and Filipino aborigines. The Malaysians and Indonesians have settled in several places. The dance movements between Taiwanese aborigines and Filipino aborigines are too similar to be ignored. Even the indigenous language might be very similar. 

The Sad Truth About School History Classes (and Why I Enjoy History as a Hobby Better)

I'm no historian and this blog is just written as a hobby . Yes, you got that right and I don't record or write history for a living. It's a shame that history is an interesting subject but people can lose interest . A person would be excited to learn mathematics but can be momentarily hating mathematics . It's because teachers, regardless of what subject, are made to teach any subject with too much memorization, too little emphasis on understanding, and too much focus on grades over learning. People tend to say that grades matter more because they want monuments of stone over monuments of learning. They value the praises of medals more than a lifetime of learning. That's why some honor students fail in real life.  I saw this meme and I can relate to it. I remember elementary Civics and Culture subjects. From the second year to the third year under K+10--there's Asian History and World History . There was the whole bland textbook. Teachers occasionally do film s...

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...