Reviewing the Controversial Case of the Late Antonio L. Sanchez

-


I could remember the controversial Good Conduct Time Allowance (GCTA) controversy. The late Antonio L. Sanchez was supposedly qualified but that was later denied by former president Rodrigo R. Duterte. Right now, it creates a case of curiosity if Antonio is truly innocent or guilty. Some criminals can lie to the public about their non-involvement such as what the late Leo Echegaray did. However, others were wrongfully accused like Hubert Jeffry P. Webb and Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga. In the case of Hubert and Paco, there were witnesses to back it up that they couldn't have done the crime.

Criminal investigations can get really messy. As mentioned earlier, Hubert and Paco were both innocent. There are cases where a crime happens and the wrong people are caught. There are cases where a crime happens and the right people are caught. In the case of the late Eileen Sarmenta, her parents immediately recognized the body. Antonio alleged that Kit Alqueza, the former boyfriend of Eileen, was the one who supposedly did the crime. At that time, Antonio was said to be planning to run for governor and was rivals with the Alquezas. 

As I watched the documentary, Antonio still insists that he couldn't have done the crime. However, unlike Paco and Hubert, there don't seem to be any witnesses backing what he said up. Paco had more than 30 witnesses, photos, etc. to prove that he was in Manila. Hubert had documents that proved he was in the USA when the Vizconde Massacre happened. There was the alibi that Antonio was supposedly with his paramour named Elvira. I wonder where were the others who could testify that Antonio was with Elvira Jimenez (and they had a daughter, Marie Tonee Jimenez Sanchez) at that time in Bay, Laguna? Where are the records to prove it? 

This detail from the Supreme Court E-Library may prove that the alibis done in favor of Antonio, were rehearsed:
To recall, all the appellants relied on the defense of denial/alibi, i.e., they were at their respective homes on the night of the rape-slay.  But Centeno and Malabanan confirmed the presence of all the appellants on the night of June 28, 1993 till the early morning of the following day and detailed the exact participation of each in the crime.  Positive identification by credible witnesses of the accused as the perpetrators of the crime, as we have consistently held, demolishes the alibi[11] - the much abused sanctuary of felons.[12] Moreover, except for the Mayor who presented Ave Marie Tonee Jimenez Sanchez (his daughter with his mistress Elvira) and Medialdea who presented his neighbor Anastacia Gulay, the other appellants failed to present corroborating testimonial evidence to butress their respective alibis.  The defense of alibi is inherently weak especially when wanting in material corroboration.  Categorical declarations of witnesses for the prosecution of the details of the crime are more credible than the uncorroborated alibi interposed by the accused.[13] Ave Marie’s testimony is of no help to the Mayor, since alibi becomes less plausible as a defense when it is invoked and sought to be crafted mainly by the accused himself and his immediate relatives.[14] Anastacia Gulay’s testimony is likewise worthless since the trial court found her testimony rehearsed.  We will not disturb this finding because it touches on credibility.

Unlike the Chiong 7 suspects who were simply your regular delinquents--Antonio had power at that time. The Chiong 7's first two suspects had several people outside their clan to prove their innocence. Paco had his school instructors, the photos (which the late Judge Martin Ocampo et al alleged was possibly tampered with), Cebu City Vice Mayor Raymond Alvin N. Garcia even presented negatives in court, and several witnesses from Manila. Friends aren't immediate relatives. Also, the trial court found that Anastacia Gulay's testimony was rehearsed. Not to mention, Antonio also had lots of unexplained wealth--which could make cover-ups even easier than what the Larrañagas and Aznars would've have had.

Just reading this from the Philippine Star should make anyone question the claims of Antonio as "wrongly accused": 

Copies of the titles of 19 parcels of land owned by Sanchez and his wife Editha, now registered under the name of the state, were received by the Office of the Ombudsman last March 1, the agency announced yesterday. 

In a decision in July 2016, the Sandiganbayan ordered the forfeiture of Sanchez’s properties, including a residential building, two Mercedez Benzes, a 1991 Dodge Caravan, shares in a lending business as well as cash and bank accounts.

Sanchez and his wife declared an income of P855,073.88 based on their joint tax returns from 1986 to 1992.

Sanchez had a salary of P17,724 per month when he was mayor in 1980 and 1981, P26,388 from 1981 to 1986, and P10,443 from 1988 when Calauan was downgraded to a fifth class municipality. 

The Sandiganbayan said the tax declaration and income of the couple were “grossly disproportionate” to their lavish lifestyle.

Graft probers said the couple sent their three children to Hurtwood House, an exclusive school in London with a tuition of P1 million each; had frequent trips to the United States, Italy, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan and Hong Kong; hosted a lavish birthday party for 550 guests at Manila Hotel, and owned several properties, including luxury vehicles.

“Respondents’ assets and expenses were grossly and manifestly disproportionate to their legitimate income… These assets and the funds used for the disproportionate expenses were unlawfully acquired… and subject to forfeiture,” the Sandiganbayan ruling read.

Later on, it was revealed that while in prison, Antonio also had misbehavior involving drugs inside Bilibid. Later on, the same person had a lot of contraband to answer for in 2015. This was different from what Paco and his co-accused were in Bilibid. Paco wasn't getting any special treatment whether he was in Bagong Buhay Rehabilitation Center (BBRC) or when he was transferred to New Bilibid Prison. Paco had proof of his innocence documented. At this point, I doubt that Antonio had any photos or records to prove he was with his mistress in Bay, Laguna. 

Unfortunately, there are times when the guilty get punished along with the innocent. I believe that Antonio is guilty as much as I believe Hubert and Paco are innocent. With how Antonio was, it can be safe to assume that his trial wasn't haphazard unlike what happened to Hubert and Paco. 

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-
Image
As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow -- a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia --it was really a trial by gossip . In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro.  I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how cou
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more