Skip to main content

The Chiong Sisters Case Muddled by the Philippines' RAMBUNCTIOUS PRESS?

Here's a clip of the late Carlos P. Celdran and Teddy Boy Locsin Jr. from Michael Collins' YouTube channel. Until now, I still wonder if the director of that awful film Animal (2004) namely Federico "Toto" Natividad Jr. was also there during the Cinemalaya premiere. The film Animal (2004) was once entitled Butakal: Sugapa sa Laman in 1999, meaning Male Pig: Drunkard in Body. This clip talks about just how the whole media frenzy caused a double miscarriage of justice.  

Celdran, a known reformist and vocal anti-Duterte critic, voiced out the unethical making of a Maalaala Mo Kaya episode. Did I miss something back in the 1990s? All I remember was broadcasting an episode in The Calvento Files. Until now, the ABS-CBN YouTube channel hasn't uploaded it. How both Marty Syjuco and Collins got some clips of the film isn't specifically said. I believe Marty and Michael went to the late Tony Calvento, asked for his permission, and were given permission. I believe that Calvento was even interviewed during the making of Give Up Tomorrow. Marty was a brother-in-law of Paco Larrañaga's older sister, Mimi Larrañaga-Syjuco. However, there was more objectivity in it than the awful film Jacqueline Comes Home. Do we forget that Thelma Jimenea-Chiong was also related to the presidential secretary Cheryl Jimenea, and to the wife of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr.? 

Teddy Boy Locsin Jr. gives a totally different view here, from what was seen in Give Up Tomorrow (read updated here). Like many others, Locsin was misled to believe that Paco was guilty. Locsin gives what I believe is a heartfelt apology to Paco, the same thing that Niño Muhlach did years later. I wondered why Niño said sorry to Paco, many years later. It was because Niño portrayed Paco in that episode of The Calvento Files. I even learned that Paco was innocent several years after Give Up Tomorrow was released. I never even knew he was transferred to Spain or there was a run for him. It was all because I concluded that Paco was guilty, that's it.

The problem with Trial by Publicity reveals a lot of stuff. The late Lee Kuan Yew said this in his book From Third World to First:

Ramos knew well the difficulties of trying to govern with strict American-style separation of powers. The senate had already defeated Mrs. Aquino's proposal to retain the American bases. The Philippines had a rambunctious press but it did not check corruption. Individual press reporters could be bought, as could many judges.

LKY was still alive at that time. I'm afraid the book From Third World to First has been made unavailable because of sentiments towards the late Flor Contemplacion. It's upsetting how LKY is often mentioned against the Marcoses but the rest of his good advice is often ignored. LKY was right to call the Philippine press to be rambunctious. How can anti-reform people expect the media is "enough" to check on corruption--it can be easily bought as could many judges? LKY doesn't give advice from an ivory tower. LKY has given good economic advice. Two Communist countries took the advice and became richer. What's so sad is the Philippines didn't take LKY's advice. Not only did the economics not do much--the justice system was so badly done.

With the truth coming out all the more, it's only fair that the badly written movie called Jacqueline Comes Home flops. Not only did not give justice to the family of the bereaved (and please don't believe the claims that the two sisters are still alive)--it also continued to insist on the same narrative. The first four suspects already had their bad records. Paco and Josman Aznar admitted to being bad boys. James Anthony and James Andrew, the Uy brothers, were also known to be troublemakers. However, let's not give people a fault that isn't theirs. However, with the power of media, that's possible especially with a public crying out for justice too soon, without considering that, "There's still due process!" 

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...

The 1978 Batasang Pambansa Proves There was NO Real Parliamentary System

I'm getting tired of people who still insist that the parliamentary system will never work, because it was "tried and tested" during the reign of Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.. However, further data have proven that there was really no parliamentary system . Salvador "Doy" Laurel even mentioned that in Marcos' own words, Marcos was never legitimately installed as president or prime minister. Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr. even mentioned in his speech in Los Angeles, "We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament." The government was supposed to be British type, and it went to the French type. Ninoy rightfully called it  80 Days Around the World . To think it over, the role of the president in a parliamentary system is supposed to be purely ceremonial. However, one must look at the comedy of errors  with the Marcos rule. Marcos' prime minister, until he himself handpicked Cesar Virata as prime minister, was himself (read here )....

Very Easy to Say, "I'm Sure!" and Be Wrong, Am I Right?

  I guess that foolish old man did the right thing to block me on social media. The old man remained incorrigible while having his toga display, apparently getting a doctorate.  An earlier post I wrote was about the misuse and abuse of CTTO . I even wonder who in the world is Merkado CTTO? It's very easy to use CTTO to look smart. However, real studies need more than CTTO but several sources. It should be several valid sources and not just sources you agree with. I was laughing at this old man in a toga (who has thankfully blocked me after I tried to refute his errors as a  nobody ) who tends to use CTTO. I think he was also fond of saying, "I'm sure!" and then it ends up with several stupid claims. Such people would be in what might be best called the MARITES Pyramid of Learning (read here ). These people's best sources can be summarized as "Trust me bro" or "Just trust me". In the case of the meme I made, the peak of the pyramid is, "Jus...

Today in Philippine History: Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s OWN WORDS Showed the Philippines WASN'T a Real Parliamentary

I remembered writing some time ago about why the Marcos Sr. Regime couldn't be a parliamentary government . Yet, there are some people (and I assume many of these are boomers who were in their 20s during the martial law era, so they're old men by now like a certain irrelevant dancer) that the Marcos Sr. Years were a parliamentary system. It would be interesting to raise up again the very speech of the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. himself. January 17, 1984, was what some call the fake uplifting of martial law. It was also on that day Marcos Sr. himself revealed why the Marcos Sr. Years was still presidential even with his parliament taken from The Official Gazette :  The adoption of certain aspects of a parliamentary system in the amended Constitution does not alter its essentially presidential character . Article VII on the Presidency starts with this provision: ‘the President shall be the Head of State and Chief Executive of the Republic of the Philippines.’ Its last section ...