Skip to main content

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

PhilStar

It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in "How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps". That means all candidates would need to do the following:

  1. Study and specialize
  2. Wait for the call
  3. Tea sessions and panels
  4. Take a test
  5. Perform well as an MP
  6. Win the trust of your peers
  7. Prepare for office
The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party is often overshadowed by the leading candidate. For example, the presidential elections in the Philippines ended up with a Marcos Jr. vs. Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo personality-based election. The election might've as well taken place at an entertainment center. The presidency should be handed over to whoever wins in a one vs. one watch. Let's say that Marcos Jr. shoots more balls than Mrs. Robredo. It would be dumb to let Marcos Jr. win because he shot more balls. The same goes for letting Mrs. Robredo win because she simply shot more balls than Marcos Jr.

The Dilawans can have all the press conferences they want. They can rejoice in the acquittal of Atty. Leila De Lima. They can rejoice in Senator Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel in her pursuit of the Guo Hua Ping case. However, all of these don't really do any real checks and balances. It's because the presidential system is based on popularity, winner takes all types of elections. They can continue to glorify Mrs. Robredo for all they want. However, that's not really the best way to hold Marcos Jr. accountable. 

PARL

Take a look at the parliamentary system there in contrast to the Batasang Pambansa (National Assembly) by the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. I wrote why the claim that Marcos Sr. built a parliamentary Philippines was so wrong. Unfortunately, never mind that the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos Sr. sitting in power. Marcos Sr. has never been formally elected as president or prime minister. As the Martial Law Museum gives its details that the first Marcos Administration was never a real parliamentary system. Even more, Aquino Jr. even named the painful truth that the Philippines had a parliamentary system without a parliament. Later on, Cesar Virata was nominated as prime minister. However, a true parliamentarian in the late Lee Kuan Yew called Virata as a non-starter for politics. LKY would know better than those who claim that the first Marcos Administration was under a parliamentary system.

In other words, under a real parliamentary system, the Dilawan politicians would be face to face against each other. With the parliamentary elections focused on parties over platforms--the Dilawan brand is under the Liberal Party of the Philippines (LPP). If Filipinos are impressed by the LPP--the party would get a vote. The focus would be the LPP--not any candidate they would have for prime minister. If the LPP fails to secure government seats but gets enough votes--they will secure the opposition seats. That means the LPP would be sitting on the right side. As the Opposition, the LPP will have its Opposition Leader, Deputy Opposition Leader, and their own set of ministers to counter the government ministers.

This would be the role of the Liberal Party if it were they are the Opposition in a parliamentary system:
The primary role of the Official Opposition, as well as other, smaller opposition parties and Independent Members, is to question government actions, to present alternatives to government positions, and to provide the option of an alternative government.

The opposition enjoys privileges and duties well established by tradition. The floor of the Legislative Chamber provides opposition MLAs with a key area in which to perform their role, which is to scrutinize the policies and actions of the government. Opportunities for the opposition to perform their unique role include Oral Question Period and the two major debates: the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne and the budget. Debates on proposed legislation also give the opposition the chance to scrutinize the government and put forward amendments to bills. During the Estimates debates on proposed government expenditures (also known as the Committee of Supply), opposition Members will pose detailed questions on ministry spending plans for the upcoming fiscal year.

Opposition parties also work to communicate their views to British Columbians and to establish an identity as a possible alternative government. The opposition holds an important role in the Legislative Assembly and contributes to the effectiveness of British Columbia's parliamentary democracy by monitoring Cabinet and encouraging the government to act prudently and with accountability.

The source above comes from the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. That would be a legitimate parliamentary system. 

The Dilawans need to abandon the idea once and for all that, the Marcos Years were a real parliament. If only they saw how real parliamentary countries work--they would see the best. They would realize that for them to be in the Opposition (and that's as an entire party)-- they would need a genuine parliamentary system. That means when the LPP becomes the Opposition--it goes head-to-head against the incumbent government. For example, if PDP-Laban becomes the Government while LPP wins enough votes--the latter becomes the Opposition. LPP's role would be to question the government in person during the weekly question hour. The LPP would also provide alternatives for better governance.

What's LPP waiting for? Another miracle? Another leader like the late Benigno Simeon Aquino III? Another widow from their party? No, LPP needs to make the move now to say yes to a parliamentary Philippines, right now. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Ninoy's Words, "We Had a Parliamentary Form of Government WITHOUT a Parliament!"

Some people on Facebook continually spread the lie, "The parliamentary form of government will never work because the Marcos Sr. years were a parliament!" The idea is incredibly stupid when you realize some old information that they probably ignored. It's a shame that some boomers refuse to surf the Internet to find decades-old information  that would prove it otherwise. Come on, are they even too lazy to order Third World to First written by the late Lee Kuan Yew and only use it to criticize the Marcoses?  With the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr., I really must highlight that he actually spilled out much truth in this speech done in Los Angeles in 1981: And so my friends, we started with an American-type constitution, we move to a British-type constitution.  We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament. Until 1978, we did not have a parliament. And yet, we were supposed to be a parliamentary from of government.  And Mr. Marcos said, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are People Who Say Systems Don't Matter Be Willing to Prove Their Claims for a Million Pesos?

People often argue that it's not the system but the people who run it. Some people have their examples like the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III and former Philippine vice president Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo. They would say that both Noynoy and Leni are "prime examples" why charter change isn't needed, just a change of people in power. Some people even say that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that's so then what happened to Article XVII that makes it open to amendments? Why wasn't that even used? That means even making a new constitution isn't illegal per se--unless one did what Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. did during the martial law era! However, if we understand simple psychological science, we need to look at basic psychology. Please, I don't need a doctorate in certain degrees, in the Greenbelt Universities, to understand that there are mist...
Post a Comment
Read more

Today in History: Hanoi's Liberation Day

Vietnam Times October 10 is mostly associated with Double 10 in Taiwan. However, Communism has its celebration with Hanoi Liberation Day . I got this information from the Vietnam Times on what the day is all about: Along with the victory of Dien Bien Phu campaign, the Geneva Agreements on armistice in Indochina was signed. After many days of struggling in the Geneva Conference, agreements on transfering Hanoi to the Vietnamese people were finally signed on September 30th and October 2nd 1954 in the United Armistice Center Committee. Following the Resolution on September 17th 1954 of the Government Council, the City Troops Committee of Hanoi was established with General Vuong Thua Vu, the commander of the Pioneer Division, as the Chairman and doctor Tran Duy Hung as the Vice Chairman. The City Troops Committee of Hanoi had the task of taking over and managing the city. The Military Commanders ordered the Vietnamese soldier units to take over the city of Hanoi and abide by the policies ...
Post a Comment
Read more