Skip to main content

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

PhilStar

It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in "How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps". That means all candidates would need to do the following:

  1. Study and specialize
  2. Wait for the call
  3. Tea sessions and panels
  4. Take a test
  5. Perform well as an MP
  6. Win the trust of your peers
  7. Prepare for office
The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party is often overshadowed by the leading candidate. For example, the presidential elections in the Philippines ended up with a Marcos Jr. vs. Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo personality-based election. The election might've as well taken place at an entertainment center. The presidency should be handed over to whoever wins in a one vs. one watch. Let's say that Marcos Jr. shoots more balls than Mrs. Robredo. It would be dumb to let Marcos Jr. win because he shot more balls. The same goes for letting Mrs. Robredo win because she simply shot more balls than Marcos Jr.

The Dilawans can have all the press conferences they want. They can rejoice in the acquittal of Atty. Leila De Lima. They can rejoice in Senator Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel in her pursuit of the Guo Hua Ping case. However, all of these don't really do any real checks and balances. It's because the presidential system is based on popularity, winner takes all types of elections. They can continue to glorify Mrs. Robredo for all they want. However, that's not really the best way to hold Marcos Jr. accountable. 

PARL

Take a look at the parliamentary system there in contrast to the Batasang Pambansa (National Assembly) by the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. I wrote why the claim that Marcos Sr. built a parliamentary Philippines was so wrong. Unfortunately, never mind that the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos Sr. sitting in power. Marcos Sr. has never been formally elected as president or prime minister. As the Martial Law Museum gives its details that the first Marcos Administration was never a real parliamentary system. Even more, Aquino Jr. even named the painful truth that the Philippines had a parliamentary system without a parliament. Later on, Cesar Virata was nominated as prime minister. However, a true parliamentarian in the late Lee Kuan Yew called Virata as a non-starter for politics. LKY would know better than those who claim that the first Marcos Administration was under a parliamentary system.

In other words, under a real parliamentary system, the Dilawan politicians would be face to face against each other. With the parliamentary elections focused on parties over platforms--the Dilawan brand is under the Liberal Party of the Philippines (LPP). If Filipinos are impressed by the LPP--the party would get a vote. The focus would be the LPP--not any candidate they would have for prime minister. If the LPP fails to secure government seats but gets enough votes--they will secure the opposition seats. That means the LPP would be sitting on the right side. As the Opposition, the LPP will have its Opposition Leader, Deputy Opposition Leader, and their own set of ministers to counter the government ministers.

This would be the role of the Liberal Party if it were they are the Opposition in a parliamentary system:
The primary role of the Official Opposition, as well as other, smaller opposition parties and Independent Members, is to question government actions, to present alternatives to government positions, and to provide the option of an alternative government.

The opposition enjoys privileges and duties well established by tradition. The floor of the Legislative Chamber provides opposition MLAs with a key area in which to perform their role, which is to scrutinize the policies and actions of the government. Opportunities for the opposition to perform their unique role include Oral Question Period and the two major debates: the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne and the budget. Debates on proposed legislation also give the opposition the chance to scrutinize the government and put forward amendments to bills. During the Estimates debates on proposed government expenditures (also known as the Committee of Supply), opposition Members will pose detailed questions on ministry spending plans for the upcoming fiscal year.

Opposition parties also work to communicate their views to British Columbians and to establish an identity as a possible alternative government. The opposition holds an important role in the Legislative Assembly and contributes to the effectiveness of British Columbia's parliamentary democracy by monitoring Cabinet and encouraging the government to act prudently and with accountability.

The source above comes from the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. That would be a legitimate parliamentary system. 

The Dilawans need to abandon the idea once and for all that, the Marcos Years were a real parliament. If only they saw how real parliamentary countries work--they would see the best. They would realize that for them to be in the Opposition (and that's as an entire party)-- they would need a genuine parliamentary system. That means when the LPP becomes the Opposition--it goes head-to-head against the incumbent government. For example, if PDP-Laban becomes the Government while LPP wins enough votes--the latter becomes the Opposition. LPP's role would be to question the government in person during the weekly question hour. The LPP would also provide alternatives for better governance.

What's LPP waiting for? Another miracle? Another leader like the late Benigno Simeon Aquino III? Another widow from their party? No, LPP needs to make the move now to say yes to a parliamentary Philippines, right now. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

BRUTAL Truth: Stop HOPING for Another "PNoy-Like President" Because the Parliamentary System will Produce MUCH BETTER Leaders

Let me get this straight, I'm not here to totally dismiss the good that the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" C. Aquino III did. I'll try to be least biased  when I'm writing this to "give a shock" to those who tend to treat his term as a "magical time". However, I'm going to have to warn people about the problem of looking for "another Messiah leader". Yesterday was the would've been 66th birthday of Noynoy if he were alive. One can talk good about Noynoy's legacy. However, we need to realize that relying on Noynoy's term is a violation of the Mahathir Mohamad principle of "Never stop learning."  We need to think that there's only one Noynoy and when he died, he died . TV-5 reveals that Rep. Edgar Erice, a long-time friend of the late leader, also said the following: Caloocan City 2nd District Rep. Edgar Erice made the remark in a social media post marking Aquino’s 66th birth anniversary.  In the post, he co...
Read more

The 1986 Snap Elections Would Also Disprove the Myth of the "Marcos Parliament"

Anti-charter change proponents love to use Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. among their reasons, to defend their stand. The argument is that "charter change must be evil" because Marcos used it--a fallacy of Guilt by Association . Please, even Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo's supporter  Andrew James Masigan  supports charter change! Now, we must look at Marcos and remember another significant event. It's the 1986 snap elections and why it's also proof that we never had a parliamentary form of government. February 7, 1986, was when Marcos declared snap elections. Two years before the snap election, Marcos even declared that the Philippines was never a parliamentary government under him : The adoption of certain aspects of a parliamentary system in the amended Constitution does not alter its essentially presidential character . Article VII on the Presidency starts with this provision:  ‘the President shall be the Head of State and Chief Executive of the Republic of the Ph...
Read more

Facts vs. Gossip: The "Chona Mae" Incident is Proof You NEED to Verify What You Hear

It was in 2012 when the Chona Mae incident happened. I remember the panic when people were running the opposite direction while I was working at Downtown, Cebu. The traffic was bad. People were panikcing. But the real twist? It was actually a father looking for his daughter, whose identity we may never know.  The Cebu Daily News   said this last 2022, which was before entering the post-COVID world: CEBU CITY, Philippines — It has been a decade since the famous “Chona Mae” line was uttered by a father looking for her daughter after a 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the island of Cebu, February 6, 2012 .  From what was a simple call of a father to his daughter turned out to be the biggest tsunami scare in Cebu City.  “Ang tubig naa na sa Colon!” ("The Water is already in Colon!") was the line that has gotten everyone running on the street of Cebu looking for shelters up in the mountain parts of Cebu.  Today, we remember that frightful yet somehow funny day that w...
Read more

Learning About Chinese Dialects

As I look back on my college days, I recall learning more about Chinese history in a Chinese Language Class elective. Yes, it was going back to Grade 1 Chinese, but doing Grade 1 Chinese right. I looked at this video and thought of China's many dialects. A dialect is defined by the Oxford dictionary as, "a particular form of a language which is peculiar to a specific region or social group." The subject was taught in English, not requiring students to learn Hokkien first, and it was how the Chinese school system should've been. Most Chinese Filipinos (like myself) are Hokkien speakers. Amoy is known as Xiamen today, a coastal city of the Fujian Province. I was shocked to learn there are many different types of Chinese, such as Cantonese (used in Hong Kong), and I wasn't shocked to learn that Hainan and Hakka are other dialects in China. Similar to Filipino, China has several languages too! In the Philippines, we have Tagalog, Cebuano, Kapampangan, Waray, and Hilig...
Read more

Why I Believe So Many Filipinos (Especially Boomers) Misunderstand (and Blindly Oppose) Charter Change

Okay, I'm no political analyst or historian. That doesn't mean I should just shut up and not share my opinion. I felt like I needed to publish this piece. This is where I want to examine another issue. I've noticed some people on Facebook are sharing the quotes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Some would try to do Ad Hominem attacks on me because I'm no constitutionalist (which I admit that I'm not). Just because I'm not a constitutionalist, doesn't mean, that I can't quote from the experts . Do I really need a degree in law at one of those prestigious universities in the Philippines? Sadly, some people are supposedly smarter than me but are the ones spreading nonsense.  Understanding charter change We need to see the definition first to understand why so many Filipinos, especially boomers , are so against it. The Philippine Star   gives this definition of charter change: Charter change, simply, is the process of introducing amendments or revisions to the ...
Read more