Skip to main content

Remembering the Traditional Chinese Textbook in Chinese Filipino Schools Back in My Day

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines

 This textbook was a symbol of my past trauma, especially during my high school years. I didn't have formal Chinese education and I had to face off with someone who was pretty much like the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Sure, that MDS-like teacher taught me a lot of stuff that I learned later in life. I'm still grateful I ran into that MDS-like teacher who still helped me after she flunked me. However, I feel the traditional Chinese textbooks were a really big hurdle to learning how to speak Mandarin.

It's no joke that Mandarin has become more and more widely spoken. According to Langoly, this isn't a surprise to me as to why I viewed Mandarin as very important:
There are around 1.118 billion speakers of Mandarin Chinese, and it has been spoken in China for more than 3,000 years. Mandarin Chinese is also the official language of Singapore and Taiwan. There are many other languages in China (like Cantonese), but Mandarin is by far the most widely spoken.

Many people mistake Mandarin for the most spoken language in the world. In reality, it’s the language with the most native speakers and is the most spoken language in Asia. This means there are a lot of great advantages for people who speak Mandarin.

This is also no surprise about Mandarin as Asia's ever-growing language according to Langoly:

There are over 1.2 billion people who speak Mandarin, making it the most spoken language in Asia and the language with the most native speakers in the world. It’s the official language of China and Taiwan and is one of 4 official languages in Singapore. Within China, people speak many different dialects, some of which have significant differences from Mandarin and can be considered their own language. But Mandarin is the only official language of China and is spoken by over 70% of the population.

Mandarin consists of over 50,000 characters, although you only need to know 2-3,000 characters to be considered fluent. It’s also a tonal language with 4 different tones that affect the meaning of a word. It’s considered a difficult language for English speakers to learn, but being able to speak Mandarin can open doors in many sectors like business and diplomacy

However, the books never bothered to bridge the gap. Instead, when you're in a Chinese school, it's pretty much one size fits all. It's no wonder cheating is very prevalent in the Chinese class. I remembered flunking Grade 2 because I secretly asked, "What am I learning?" It doesn't help it when elders say, "Pass! Pass! Never mind if you learned something or not! Just pass and get a good grade!" Never mind that the key to getting good grades well-deserved is not just hard work but also studying smart. Studying hard is one thing but are we taught to study smart?

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines

Back then, teachers had no choice but to teach Zhuyin Fuhao. One time, we did use some romanize (and wrongly done) and we had to erase it. We were told to practice using Zhuyin. The big problem was that we had to memorize an entirely different set of Chinese with the traditional Zhuyin. What was never seen was that Zhuyin was going to become less and less used eventually. The problem was that the Taiwan standard was followed. Taiwan had drift against Pinyin because of political reasons. I'm led to believe that Hanyu Pinyin's invention was antagonized because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took credit for what one of its biggest critics did. The late Zhou Yougang was a heavy critic of the tyrannical regime of Mao Zedong. Later, Zhou died at 111 years old while he was a critic of the CCP.

The big problem posed by these textbooks is that they don't bridge the gap. They require the person to learn Chinese immediately before entering the class. Didn't we go to the classroom to learn Chinese first? Also, if Zhuyin was used to teach us how to read, why aren't we taught the fundamentals of how to read before memorizing questions and answers. Worse, the memorization of questions and answers becomes meaningless if people don't understand what's being memorized. The only thing they fear was the scathing remarks of their conservative Chinese Filipino parents (who probably can't even speak proper Mandarin) and that the teacher wouldn't hit their hand with the ruler or pointing stick.

Some people took too much pride in their good old days. It's not as if one can use Zhuyin Fuhao to register their business in a non-Chinese-speaking country. Try to notice how Hanyu Pinyin has been helpful in getting the business permit. I go to get some milk tea and I see Chatime (which Cha is written in Pinyin) written as ㄔㄚTime? That would be very funny. The City Hall wouldn't even honor it because they don't know how to read Zhuyin. The integration of Pinyin isn't only because it's easier. It helps non-Chinese speakers and Chinese speakers have a closer bridge. These days, I feel bragging about how one is so good in Zhuyin is like taking pride in writing their reports on that paper-eating monster called a typewriter. Some people do still use typewriters for some reason (e.g. filling out forms as neatly as possible) but it's not really recommended for efficiency. I really hate using the typewriter until now!

These traditional textbooks never taught one how to speak Chinese. One had to learn how to read Chinese first but what if Chinese isn't one's default language? It's a stupid assumption that Chinese Filipinos automatically know Chinese. A language isn't spoken by one's genetics but by one's learning. A Chinese man who grows up in America may not even know how to speak Chinese. An American who goes and studies Mandarin in Beijing will be able to speak Chinese. The traditional textbooks are unreasonably demanding of the learner. There's no real reward in learning how to read except for not getting disciplinary action from the Chinese language teacher. 

It's time the books should be put as museum artifacts. It could represent how previous generations tried to keep the Chinese language like it was meant only for them. However, with the rise of Mandarin speakers, these old textbooks are a no-no to learning Mandarin. Instead, the use of bilingual Chinese textbooks can slowly build up conversations. Learning Mandarin Chinese can be done by building understanding. The old textbooks never bothered to do that. It'd make sense if the books were in China or Taiwan. Even Taiwan and China started to modify the way Chinese is taught to non-Chinese speakers. 

The boomers need to see that learning methods must evolve. It doesn't matter how many times you get rid of a Chinese language teacher. The problem itself is the system that teaches Chinese. Some people do have their horror stories about the traditional Chinese textbook. I have mine too. A good grade can only be rewarding if it was done not just out of hard work but also if learning was the top priority, not just the grades alone. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wrong Assumption: Those Who Wish to Reform the 1987 Constitution are Automatically Marcos Loyalists and Diehard Duterte Supporters

Orion Perez Dumdum, founder of the CoRRECT Movement was featured in the INQUIRER.net page. It's no surprise that there would be detractors every now and then. Some people still believe that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that were so then why does Article XVII exist that the constitution is open for amendments ? It's no surprise that some idiot alleged that Orion is actually a Marcos supporter. The arguments by the anti-reforms are basically Nom Sequitur and Ad Hominem . The use of personal attacks and illogical conclusions are common argument flaws. In fact, one just needs to understand the poor Filipino logic . I remember all the stupidity going on. It's funny such people accuse me of Ad Hominems while doing Ad Hominems themselves! What I'd like to focus on is the Nom Sequitur. Its definition is: 1 : an inference (see inference sense 1) that does not follow from the premises (see premise entry 1 sense 1) specifically : a fallacy

Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, the Only Constitution That Institutionalizes, "Public Office is a Public Trust"?

  It's time to revisit one of the favorite people for people against constitutional amendments or reforms, namely Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (read here ). Yes, the same guy who was also related by marriage to Mrs. Thelma Jimenea-Chiong. Davide's school of thought is in the "uniqueness" of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines as if it's the "best constitution in the world". Davide would mention that the 1987 Constitution is the only one he knows would be the best. A shame really that Davide himself, like Kishore Mahbubani, was once a United Nations representative, and he's saying such stuff.  Article XI of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines writes this in Section 1: Section 1. Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must, at all times, be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency; act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives. Okay, I get it. However

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

  People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it ), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late.  Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this: It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is

Are People Who Say Systems Don't Matter Be Willing to Prove Their Claims for a Million Pesos?

People often argue that it's not the system but the people who run it. Some people have their examples like the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III and former Philippine vice president Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo. They would say that both Noynoy and Leni are "prime examples" why charter change isn't needed, just a change of people in power. Some people even say that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that's so then what happened to Article XVII that makes it open to amendments? Why wasn't that even used? That means even making a new constitution isn't illegal per se--unless one did what Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. did during the martial law era! However, if we understand simple psychological science, we need to look at basic psychology. Please, I don't need a doctorate in certain degrees, in the Greenbelt Universities, to understand that there are mist

The Happy Aborigines Taiwanese Song

  While looking for an Aborigine song that gave me an earworm--I found this interesting aboriginal song. By looking at this video, I suspect that this song is actually a love song between a man and a woman,. It does sound very Ifugao-like as well. 

"Give Up Tomorrow" Deleted Scene: The Safehouse Where the Crime Supposedly Took Place

Give Up Tomorrow has been an interesting documentary. Why I was fascinated by it because of how it shook my mind. It turned out that it was a trial by publicity . It was also at that time when The Calvento Files aired a dramatization of Davidson Rusia's testimony. As Cebu City Vice Mayor Raymond Alvin Garcia said, it was a very unpopular move. People already thought Juan Francisco G. Larrañaga aka Paco (and the seven others) were guilty. People thought Davidson's story was worth believing. Some deleted scenes never made it into the final cut  This deleted scene talks about the owner of the place where the crime allegedly happened. David Gurkan now recalls his experience. According to Davidson, this was the story as recorded by the Supreme Court of the Philippines:  From the evidence of the prosecution, there is no doubt that all the appellants conspired in the commission of the crimes charged. Their concerted actions point to their joint purpose and community of intent. Well se

The Curious Case of Dayang Dayang, Not Dayang Daya

I remembered the song "Dayang Dayang" which had a parody cover called "Dayang Daya". Some people wondered if it was from India. Some say it was a Muslim song which makes more sense. It's because the beats almost sound like one from Filipino Muslim dances. Granted, a lot of Filipinos descended from either Malaysian or Indonesian settlers then it would make sense if Dayang Dayang is danced to the Pakiring. The song I just share comes from an Indonesian singer who probably popularized the song.  Many words from the Filipino language match up with Malaysian language or Indonesian language. The Filipino word for help (tulong) is tolong in Indonesian and Malaysian. The Malaysian (or Indonesian) term Dayang is said to mean a noble lady. It would make sense of the song "Dayang Dayang" would've come from Indonesia, Malaysia, or from Mindanao in the Philippines.  This was the most common version heard. I think the video maker wrongly attributed it to Bollywo

The Chiong Sisters Case Muddled by the Philippines' RAMBUNCTIOUS PRESS?

Here's a clip of the late Carlos P. Celdran and Teddy Boy Locsin Jr. from Michael Collins' YouTube channel. Until now, I still wonder if the director of that awful film Animal (2004) namely Federico "Toto" Natividad Jr. was also there during the Cinemalaya premiere. The film Animal (2004) was once entitled Butakal: Sugapa sa Laman in 1999, meaning Male Pig: Drunkard in Body . This clip talks about just how the whole media frenzy caused a double miscarriage of justice.   Celdran, a known reformist and vocal anti-Duterte critic, voiced out the unethical making of a Maalaala Mo Kaya episode. Did I miss something back in the 1990s? All I remember was broadcasting an episode in The Calvento Files.  Until now, the ABS-CBN YouTube channel hasn't uploaded it. How both Marty Syjuco and Collins got some clips of the film isn't specifically said. I believe Marty and Michael went to the late Tony Calvento, asked for his permission, and were given permission. I believe tha

The Late Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino Should've Remained a National Symbol of Unity Even After EDSA 1986

Well, it's time for another today in history  entry, right? I was trying to set up a WordPress site (which might be experimental at best, for now) and it's in. WordPress is that hard to use for someone like me. Back on topic, I was tagged to a post on Facebook on ABS-CBN News Facebook page. It's no surprise that I read people's comments can be very stupid . Some keep talking like, "The 1987 Constitution is the best in the world." or "Change the people. Not the constitution." Please, if that were true why was it that the defective 1973 pseudo-parliamentary government of the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. (and I wrote a rebuttal why it isn't ) had to be replaced with another constitution . Sadly, the 1987 Constitution was written almost in such a hurry which created a lot of mistakes.  The events of EDSA reveal this detail about the late Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino. It was that Mrs. Aquino was hiding in a convent in Cebu at that time . In short, M

Very Easy to Say, "I'm Sure!' and Be Wrong, Am I Right?

  I guess that foolish old man did the right thing to block me on social media. The old man remained incorrigible while having his toga display, apparently getting a doctorate.  An earlier post I wrote was about the misuse and abuse of CTTO . I even wonder who in the world is Merkado CTTO? It's very easy to use CTTO to look smart. However, real studies need more than CTTO but several sources. It should be several valid sources and not just sources you agree with. I was laughing at this old man in a toga (who has thankfully blocked me after I tried to refute his errors as a  nobody ) who tends to use CTTO. I think he was also fond of saying, "I'm sure!" and then it ends up with several stupid claims. Such people would be in what might be best called the MARITES Pyramid of Learning (read here ). These people's best sources can be summarized as "Trust me bro" or "Just trust me". In the case of the meme I made, the peak of the pyramid is, "Jus