Skip to main content

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First, Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers.

A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parliamentary form of government is to try telling the LKYSPP for a start. The same can go for those who try and defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines as the best in the world (read here). Although Mahbubani may no longer be the idea (probably due to his age) we can't deny that the guy knows business and economics, saw Singapore rise up from third world to first, and joined a world economic forum in contrast to Davide Jr. Mahbubani can be seen offering countries advice on how to do better. What about Davide Jr.? Davide Jr. has still been spewing out nonsense about FDIs or saying that there's "absolutely no need to amend the 1987 Constitution". 

With COVID-19 being an endemic problem, it's already safe to travel than when it was a pandemic problem. Let's say that the anti-reformists who still insist that the Marcos Years were a parliamentary system would set an appointment with the National University of Singapore (NUS). These graduates may come from top Filipino universities such as Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) and the University of the Philippines (UP). I confess that I wasn't qualified for either which school. Fortunately, I could understand any academic papers written by people above me. I believe it's a requirement for professions like lawyers to write things down in a way that people beneath them can understand. I may not be a lawyer but I could at least, understand what a lawyer has to say or what a basic law textbook can teach me to a certain extent. I might need training as a lawyer to practice the profession. However, I don't need to be a lawyer to understand basic law.

These anti-reformists will say, "Okay! We'll take the challenge to Singapore!" Some of these may be elite constitutionalists. Some may be lawyers themselves. Some may just be MARITESes who just love good gossip. I could imagine if they finally faced the faculty of the LKYSPP of the NUS. They would say, "Hey, do you know that the Marcos years of the Philippines was a real parliamentary?" It might be funny if they brought Davide Jr. with them, assuming that he's still in good shape. Maybe, Mahbubani might be paying a visit to the NUS while its recent dean, Danny Quah, would probably be there with the faculty. I could imagine if these anti-reformists would be bringing a TV crew with them so they can prove, once and for all, that the Marcos Years, were indeed under a parliamentary form of government.

I could imagine the end results. The LKYSPP knows how a real parliamentary system is run. It might be amusing if Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong were there to personally watch the debate. Even better, if LSH also had Singaporean President Halimah Yacob (and I believe, until now, that the late Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino should've remained symbolic even after EDSA) together with all parliament members to watch it. The anti-reformist teams might state their "evidences" such as that there was a prime minister named Virata, that a parliament was really formed, and that it was a modified parliament. I could imagine how the real experts in running a parliamentary system would respond.

Knowing typical Filipino emotionalism, I could imagine the tantrums that some anti-reformists must throw. Some of these anti-reforms who insist that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines, was under a parliamentary government, belong to the boomer generation (read here). Yet, some of these boomers are still immature people on social media even in their 60s. They post offensive icons, brag how "great" they are (and it's easy to brag about what you don't have). I could imagine them acting like little children who lost in a game. They might start hissing even at Singapore, maybe even raise the issue of the late Flor Contemplacion, etc. It could be very funny if LSH would actually order their arrest at the NUS for losing their temper.

The results might be funny. Maybe, they might be flogged on live television where they'll be screaming, "The Marcos years were parliamentary!" A strike of the cane hits the buttocks. They will keep insisting on it even after they get the recommended number of strokes. I wonder if they'll try to make themselves look like martyrs instead of the fools they truly are, if ever that happened? 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...
Read more

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T...
Read more

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...
Read more

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...
Read more