Skip to main content

"We Are Millennials" Facebook Page and Its Nonsense Argument Against SIM Registration

 

I was looking at the Facebook page We Are Millennials. It's amazing, really, how these fools have been posting their content. This time, I'd like to blog about their gossip about sim card registration. Mind you, the comments section where I got the photo from above there can be so toxic so comment and argue with caution. That's why I'm hesitant to allow commenting here because, man, commenting can be so toxic. It's one thing to comment giving constructive criticism. However, I'm afraid more people today are so into derailing others instead of helping them.

It's one thing to say that SIM card registration will totally delete scams. It's another thing to say it will help minimize them. They say that it's useless because of the selling of pre-registered sims. If you know it's too good to be true--it should be considered a scam. The idea of the sim being registered with a valid ID to which can make it easier to trace identity fraud. 

If We Are Millennials are using Privacy International as a source then bad news. The founder of Privacy International, Simon Davies, is actually a sex pervert. Even worse, Davies has a very "impressive" track record of molesting boys since the 1980s. With that in mind, I wonder what Privacy International is truly after especially when they said the following:

Despite mounting evidence that mandatory SIM registration is costly, intrusive and not the solution to the problem most countries are trying to solve, every year more governments try to roll it out.

Legal Void

SIM card registration is often introduced in a legal void. According to GSMA, only 59% of countries mandating SIM card registration have a privacy and/or data protection framework in place.  In the absence of comprehensive data protection legislation and oversight, SIM users' information can be shared and matched with other private and public databases, enabling the state to create comprehensive profiles of individual citizens, and enabling companies and third parties to access a vast amount of data. SIM registration is being taken to the next level and incorprating biometric registration in some countries, such as fingerprints and facial recognition. This means that the data processing required for the creation of a biometric subscriber database will also often occur in a legal void, so that information collected as part of registration today could be kept for an indefinite amount of time and used for different purposes in the future, as technology, corporate incentives, or governments change.

Surveillance

By facilitating the creation of an extensive database of user information, mandatory SIM registration places individuals at risk of being tracked or targeted, and having their private information misused. SIM registration undermines the ability of users to communicate anonymously and one’s right to privacy. This poses a threat to vulnerable groups, and facilitates surveillance by making tracking and monitoring of users easier for law enforcement authorities. Mandatory SIM registration can enable profiling with several consequences. An individual's phone number could potentially be matched with their voting preferences or health data, enabling governments to identify and target political opponents, for example, or people living with HIV/AIDs. In countries with political and ethnic tensions, pairing data with political activity might result in physical risks for the people involved. While communications surveillance systems may help a government improve national security, they are equally likely to enable the surveillance of human rights defenders, political, immigrants, and other groups.

Discrimination and Exclusion

SIM registration also brings the potential for discrimination and even exclusion from basic services. This practice disproportionately disadvantages the most marginalised groups and can have a discriminatory effect by excluding users from accessing mobile networks.When mobile phones are the most common form of accessing important avenues such as banking and finance, this could result in exclusion from numerous vital public services. In some countries, the poorest individuals are often unable to buy or register SIM cards because they don't have identification documents. Undocumented migrants can face a similar problem. In addition, given the extra burdens that SIM registration places on telcos, this may result in additional costs being passed on to customers.

This has me wondering what Davies was probably doing all this time? Just reading that Davies has been a criminal since the 1980s (or possibly earlier) can be very scary. Has it been because Davies himself has been using burner phones and several SIMs to hide his activities? Sure, surveillance can be misused and abused. However, it seems that Davies' fear of surveillance for the sake of fearing it may be because of the horror he did from 1981 to 1987. I believe that Davies may have done more horrors a little bit earlier.

I even wonder if the people running behind We Are Millennials might be operating a troll account. I guess they're probably afraid that they'd have no more access to it if their unregistered SIM cards will be deactivated. Sure, there will be people who'd try to find a way. However, if these SIM cards will get invalid, the administrators of that page might as well reveal themselves. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...
Read more

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...
Read more

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...
Read more

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...
Read more

30 Years of Flor Contemplacion Crybabies Spreading Fake News

Liza Maza Facebook Page It's 30 years since Flor Contemplacion was executed in Singapore. My memories was how some people felt hatred for Singapore, how we were told that "Filipinos are always oppressed." in both values education and civics classes, and how Flor should be regarded as a heroine. The Buwan Ng Wika program came and Flor's execution was also highlighted in the song "Kuko Ng Agila" (Claws of the Eagle). Flor was always romanticized as innocent, a martyr, and even some decent Filipinos bought it once. However, I soon accepted Flor's execution to be what it is-- Singaporean justice .  Some people are still continuing to commemorate Flor--as if she was some kind of Catholic saint or martyr. I could remember rallies year after year, commemorating Flor's "martyrdom". What was also ironic was, at that time, the Vizconde Massacre (read here ) happened and the wrong people were arrested. The public demanded the blood of Hubert Jeffry P....
Read more