Skip to main content

"We Are Millennials" Facebook Page and Its Nonsense Argument Against SIM Registration

 

I was looking at the Facebook page We Are Millennials. It's amazing, really, how these fools have been posting their content. This time, I'd like to blog about their gossip about sim card registration. Mind you, the comments section where I got the photo from above there can be so toxic so comment and argue with caution. That's why I'm hesitant to allow commenting here because, man, commenting can be so toxic. It's one thing to comment giving constructive criticism. However, I'm afraid more people today are so into derailing others instead of helping them.

It's one thing to say that SIM card registration will totally delete scams. It's another thing to say it will help minimize them. They say that it's useless because of the selling of pre-registered sims. If you know it's too good to be true--it should be considered a scam. The idea of the sim being registered with a valid ID to which can make it easier to trace identity fraud. 

If We Are Millennials are using Privacy International as a source then bad news. The founder of Privacy International, Simon Davies, is actually a sex pervert. Even worse, Davies has a very "impressive" track record of molesting boys since the 1980s. With that in mind, I wonder what Privacy International is truly after especially when they said the following:

Despite mounting evidence that mandatory SIM registration is costly, intrusive and not the solution to the problem most countries are trying to solve, every year more governments try to roll it out.

Legal Void

SIM card registration is often introduced in a legal void. According to GSMA, only 59% of countries mandating SIM card registration have a privacy and/or data protection framework in place.  In the absence of comprehensive data protection legislation and oversight, SIM users' information can be shared and matched with other private and public databases, enabling the state to create comprehensive profiles of individual citizens, and enabling companies and third parties to access a vast amount of data. SIM registration is being taken to the next level and incorprating biometric registration in some countries, such as fingerprints and facial recognition. This means that the data processing required for the creation of a biometric subscriber database will also often occur in a legal void, so that information collected as part of registration today could be kept for an indefinite amount of time and used for different purposes in the future, as technology, corporate incentives, or governments change.

Surveillance

By facilitating the creation of an extensive database of user information, mandatory SIM registration places individuals at risk of being tracked or targeted, and having their private information misused. SIM registration undermines the ability of users to communicate anonymously and one’s right to privacy. This poses a threat to vulnerable groups, and facilitates surveillance by making tracking and monitoring of users easier for law enforcement authorities. Mandatory SIM registration can enable profiling with several consequences. An individual's phone number could potentially be matched with their voting preferences or health data, enabling governments to identify and target political opponents, for example, or people living with HIV/AIDs. In countries with political and ethnic tensions, pairing data with political activity might result in physical risks for the people involved. While communications surveillance systems may help a government improve national security, they are equally likely to enable the surveillance of human rights defenders, political, immigrants, and other groups.

Discrimination and Exclusion

SIM registration also brings the potential for discrimination and even exclusion from basic services. This practice disproportionately disadvantages the most marginalised groups and can have a discriminatory effect by excluding users from accessing mobile networks.When mobile phones are the most common form of accessing important avenues such as banking and finance, this could result in exclusion from numerous vital public services. In some countries, the poorest individuals are often unable to buy or register SIM cards because they don't have identification documents. Undocumented migrants can face a similar problem. In addition, given the extra burdens that SIM registration places on telcos, this may result in additional costs being passed on to customers.

This has me wondering what Davies was probably doing all this time? Just reading that Davies has been a criminal since the 1980s (or possibly earlier) can be very scary. Has it been because Davies himself has been using burner phones and several SIMs to hide his activities? Sure, surveillance can be misused and abused. However, it seems that Davies' fear of surveillance for the sake of fearing it may be because of the horror he did from 1981 to 1987. I believe that Davies may have done more horrors a little bit earlier.

I even wonder if the people running behind We Are Millennials might be operating a troll account. I guess they're probably afraid that they'd have no more access to it if their unregistered SIM cards will be deactivated. Sure, there will be people who'd try to find a way. However, if these SIM cards will get invalid, the administrators of that page might as well reveal themselves. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's Be Real: Term Limits Cause Political Dynasties to Spiral Out of Control

Inquirer There's always the obsession with political dynasties. There's also the obsession with term limits . Back in the 1990s, I remembered fearing charter change . I was afraid that the late Fidel V. Ramos might become a dictator. The talks that if a president would rule for more than six years--would be considered "frightening" or "nakakatakot" in Tagalog. I wrote an article where I wrote one staggering truth-- a  long reign isn't necessarily tyrannical and that a short reign isn't necessarily benevolent . In my discussion, I highlighted both Pol Pot and Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.--both deceased dictators. Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge dictatorship murdered millions in contrast to Marcos' regime. Of course, some people will say Pol Pot would've caused Cambodia to go extinct if he rhad eigned longer. I remember the logic that I was told back in elementary school. I was told that the reason why term limits are imposed is to prevent another Marcos-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Growing Irrelevance Isn't Because of His Age But His REFUSAL to Make NECESSARY Amendments in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

It's times like this that make me ashamed to be from Cebu. This Facebook page tends to demonize charter change without realizing that it can be a proper game changer. I'm pointing out that Hon. Hilario G. Davide Jr. isn't getting irrelevant because of his age. The problem isn't growing old but when one grows old without wisdom . I'd say this is the case for Davide Jr. himself he's grown old without wisdom. He's already 88 years old but he's still too comfortable with the outdated 1987 Constitution of the Philippines as it is. Come on, if that's the case then what happened to  Article XVII  of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines?  Section 1. Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution may be proposed by: (1) The Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members; or (2)  A constitutional convention . Section 2.  Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition of at...
Post a Comment
Read more