Skip to main content

How Often Are Chinese Names in Pinyin Misread in an Asian History Class?

 
As a person born in the 1980s, I would say I saw a significant amount of technology and methods develop, I remembered typing my high school thesis stuck with a very old PC, working on my college group paper with a better PC, and finally had a laptop during my graduate school days. Back then, I remembered when Chinese schools taught Zhuyin (which I really dislike), I didn't pass my Zhuyin subject (good thing, the Chinese language teacher didn't make me take summer since I should be applying for college), and how pinyin was barely taught. It was pretty much like how some older Taiwanese folks had a bad attitude toward pinyin. Barriotic people do exist and I'm afraid that pinyin's potential was never explored back then.

It's going to be obvious that names in Chinese will be written in pinyin in the history books. I really thought there was a typographical error when Mao Zedong was spelled as such. I was used to hearing Mao Zedong as Mao Tse Tung. People read the z and the d like it was in the English language. A lot of names were mispronounced. I guess that's why the old Chinese methodology taught Zhuyin since if one knew Zhuyin, it would be harder to mispronounce. However, with a little practice, one can know when to read a little differently with another language. It's like how the letter j in Filipino is read as a softer h. People who don't know it are bound to make funny mistakes. It's like how often hear Spanish and Filipino words and names misread such as Juan, Alejo, and Junta. 


So, the basic drill is that certain letters will be read somewhat alike but different. We have the BOPOMOFO in pinyin. The drill would go like this:
  1. BP would mean reading a softer P followed by a harder P.
  2. DT would mean reading a softer T followed by a harder T.
  3. GK would mean reading a softer K followed by a harder K.
  4. JQ would mean reading a softer Qi followed by a harder Qi.
  5. CH-SH would mean reading a softer CH followed by a harder CH.
  6. ZS would mean reading a softer TS followed by a harder TS.
Basically, Z and D in Mao Zedong with be read with a softer TS and a softer T. So, reading Mao Zedong as Mao Zedong with the Z and D read like the English alphabet is fully wrong. Because of this, it's very common to misread a lot of Chinese names spelled in a romanized context. Even more, it would be important to get the tone right. The tones would be spelled as Máo Zédōng which means reading "ao" and "e" with a quick rise and "o" with a bit of a stretch. The "ao" and "e" are read with the second tone. The "o" is read with a first tone.  

The mistakes are made even by several Asian history teachers. I'm afraid that Asian history hasn't been taught to read the pinyin. That's why they are prone to reading pinyin like the English alphabet. I could remember how a Chinese language teacher soon taught some Asian history teachers how to pronounce certain words. I even remembered telling my teacher how to read Zhang Ziyi's name in pinyin. Though, I'd have missed the tones since they'll be written as Zhāng Zǐyí. 

Right now, I'm practically an advocate for the use of pinyin. I could care less if Taiwan still requires its citizens to learn zhuyin. Zhuyin is pretty much part of their heritage as much as Cebuano is to Cebu and Tagalog is the national language of the Philippines. Though, for international students, pinyin has become more accessible. It's because there will always be a need to make some changes. International marketing would mean foreign investors may need to make adjustments where they go. I believe pinyin is one of the best adjustments ever made as Chinese language is increasing worldwide. 

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T...

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...