Skip to main content

When Cheerless Christmas Hit the Philippines During the Second World War

People can be so delusional into thinking nothing wrong can happen on Christmas. Two years ago, some parts of Visayas were hit by Typhoon Ursula (Phanfone). Last year, there was no Christmas celebration because of the devastation brought by Odette. Yet, I guess not so many have thought that Christmas never made COVID-19 suddenly disappear. Christmas didn't stop the Second World War either. I decided to do a history review lesson. This time, it's about how cheerless Christmas hit the Philippines during the reign of Manuel Luis Quezon. It was during the time of Commonwealth America. We had the Allies and the AXIS forces. Sadly, the AXIS forces, under Japan, took over the Philippines. It was at that time when the Japanese emperor was still believed to be divine. Later on, Emperor Hirohito himself renounced his so-called divinity. Today, the Japanese monarchy is as symbolic as the British monarchy.

It's December and Christmas celebrations were prepared. Unfortunately, the Empire of Japan made its move on December 9, 1941. So much for saying nothing wrong happens in December, right? Right now, I wish I had asked more from my late grandparents about the war. Though, I guess my paternal grandmother, being in her 80s when I asked her, couldn't recall everything. What I could remember was hiding here and there. I also remembered my former high school teacher (who's in her 90s now) who mentioned the Japanese and their bayonets. One thing I discovered some time after my paternal grandmother died was that her father (whose tomb is in Surigao City) died on Christmas day in 1942. It was a cheerless Christmas in 1941. The Japanese forces were still allies with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. China was taken over by the Japanese forces. It was also recorded in history that Chiang Kai Shek (a democrat) and Mao Zedong (a Communist) once joined forces during the Second World War. 

I found this note on the Bohol Provincial Library's Facebook page. I couldn't help but think it's worse than Typhoon Ursula, Typhoon Odette, or the recent Christmas inflation (which is nowhere near as bad as Venezuela):

In the afternoon of December 24, 1941, the eve of Christmas, President Manuel L. Quezon, accompanied by his family and War Cabinet, moved to Corregidor, where the Commonwealth Government was transferred. He left Secretary Jorge B. Vargas, Justice Jose P. Laurel, and other top officials in Manila to look after the people’s welfare during the critical times.

The next day, December 25, 1941, was cheerless Christmas Day, it was indeed dreary. There was no singing of Christmas carols and no exchange of gifts. From the Japanese, the people received a macabre Christmas gift – death from exploding bombs.

On January 2, 1942, the Japanese invaders entered and occupied Manila. Many Filipinos bravely stayed out of doors and curiously watched the cavalcading troops. None of them cheered, none applauded.

No Christmas, no New Year celebrations in 1941 because of that terrible event. Yet, some people today act as if Christmas is such a magical day or must be all-festive. 

The Second World War. I read this one from IWM which talks about Christmas during the Second World War in Britain:

Six years of war brought many changes to familiar festive rituals. Christmas celebrations during the Second World War often had to be scaled down or adjusted as restrictions and shortages took their toll.

For many families, the most difficult part of a wartime Christmas would be spending the festive season apart from loved ones. Many men were fighting abroad in the armed forces or were being held as prisoners of war. Women might also be away in the services or carrying out war work. Many children spent Christmas away from home as evacuees. By the end of the war, thousands of families had suffered the death of a family member either in action or from enemy bombing raids.

Christmas luxuries were especially hard to come by at a time when even basic foods were scarce. People were forced to find substitutes for key festive ingredients. Gifts were often homemade and practical, and children’s toys were often made from recycled materials. Cards were smaller and printed on flimsy paper.

In 1941, to conserve paper, the Ministry of Supply decreed that 'no retailer shall provide any paper for the packing or wrapping of goods excepting food stuffs or articles which the shopkeeper has agreed to deliver'. This made it difficult to keep Christmas presents a surprise. 

Sure, Odette was hard to go buy especially when supply and demand scales got literally tipped by the super typhoon. Here, more property damage was done. I even heard of the statement "Mickey Mouse money" when money became useless during the Second World War. The Allied vs. AXIS wars weren't going to easily settled. No amount of Christmas wishes for it to end soon happened. Instead, the war went from September 1, 1939, up to September 2, 1945. The Philippines wasn't exempted either. I believe that similar problems that hit Britain were also in the Philippines.

Every Christmas, I think about how something bad can happen on Christmas like any other day. As I mentioned earlier, my great-grandfather (via my paternal grandmother) died on December 25 a year after cheerless Christmas. Charlie Chaplin died on Christmas Day. Recently, a public figure mentions he'll probably hate Christmas because he lost the woman he loved in December. December can also carry many painful memories. The Cheerless Christmas during the Second World War is also a grim reminder.

I find all the ideas of, "Never talk negative during Christmas!" to be rather stupid. What if there's a war that needs to be won? If I were the leader of the Philippines and it's a time of war--I'd really order the cancellation of Christmas whether the fun-loving crowd wants it or not. A state of emergency had to be declared. Quezon had to move to Corregidor. A state of emergency is a state of emergency. The Second World War was a real problem. It was only fair enough to keep Christmas away from the minds of people. Britain took measures by placing restrictions because of shortages. 

At this point, this isn't gossip but facts. Christmas day disasters are recorded in history. They're not gossip. It's gossip to say that nothing wrong happens during the Christmas season. It's a fact that something bad can happen even during the Christmas season. 

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...