Skip to main content

"The Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother" is a Must-Read

I think one of the most interesting must-reads is Amy Chua-Rubenfeld's book Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother. I bought that book during my MBA days and gave it a read. I remembered seeing the movie The Joy Luck Club which analyzed four different stories by Amy Tan. The Joy Luck Club explored the plight of Chinese women back then such as how they were often forced to share a husband, how gender inequality was an issue and the mistakes made by Chinese parents. There was the part where the two mothers frequently competed on who was better. "My daughter is a first-class pianist!" "My daughter is a chess prodigy!" Amy Chua, having been born during the Generation X generation, did show her mistakes as a boomer when she wrote Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother with her Jewish-American husband, Atty. Jed Rubenfeld. 

Amy Chua was born to Chinese-Filipino parents. I guess the whole Chua surname already speaks volumes. She had already violated the older Chinese rule of never intermingling or intermarrying with other races. The late Bruce Lee was already taboo when he married his American wife who was back then, known as Linda Emery. Later, Linda remarried and became Linda Lee Cadwell. It was said Lee was antagonized by the American-Chinese community when he taught martial arts to "outsiders". It also seems very common for the Chinese to migrate here and there, form their communities, and they refuse to assimilate. Amy Chua's marriage to her husband Jed would already speak volumes of how it was frowned upon. I feel that Amy's marriage to an American man found the middle ground between Chinese and American parenting.

If I were to talk in Singlish (broken Chinese English), it'd probably sound like, "American parenting overly permissive! Chinese parently overly strict!" Amy Chua did write her book rather meticulously some of the bad things she's done. She's mentioned how it worked on Sophie but backfired with Lulu. I had a cringy moment when I realize that Chinese children hardly have a life. What's worse than not being able to play video games or watch TV (well, they can be very addicting) is when you can't get a grade lower than an A. For them, an A- is a bad grade. It's very common also that Chinese boomer parents tend to hammer their children saying, "You ought to be honor student ya because I was honor student ya!" Though, some of them are forcing their children to live their broken dreams such as the case of a certain American-Chinese, Sophie Xiong. 

It was an interesting read to see how both Amy Chua and Jed both had their differences. A man raised American. A Chinese-Filipino woman who became an American-Chinese at a young age. It was common for some Chinese-Filipinos to migrate to America. In my case, I wanted to migrate to America back in 2001. Jed did raise valid points when Amy Chua went too much. Eventually, Lulu managed to rebel. It was stressful to read how Lulu finally broke. As Amy Chua said, she was humbled by her second daughter. Later, Amy Chua made adjustments from Chinese authoritarian parenting in exchange for authoritative parenting. Being strict but not too strict would be the middle ground. That's what Amy did to Lulu later on. 

It was interesting to read what Amy Chua had to write. It's very hard to think that anybody would be willing to admit they failed. It seems that honor and reputation tend to be highly held in the Chinese family. They'd do anything for it even through demeaning and well-intentioned lies. For the child to finish their food, it's common to make little white lies instead of setting appropriate punishments. For the child to do better, they issue harsh empty threats. Instead, Amy Chua wrote what might be a warning of the fallacy of appealing to tradition. Many times, Chinese tradition has gone unquestioned resulting in many bad things. However, Chinese tradition isn't static. It's like how dog and cat meat is becoming more taboo in China. Chinese men used to marry multiple wives only for it to be abolished. Chinese overly controlling parenting is the same. It needs to be thrown into the same place with every absurd Chinese tradition. 

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...