Skip to main content

"The Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother" is a Must-Read

I think one of the most interesting must-reads is Amy Chua-Rubenfeld's book Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother. I bought that book during my MBA days and gave it a read. I remembered seeing the movie The Joy Luck Club which analyzed four different stories by Amy Tan. The Joy Luck Club explored the plight of Chinese women back then such as how they were often forced to share a husband, how gender inequality was an issue and the mistakes made by Chinese parents. There was the part where the two mothers frequently competed on who was better. "My daughter is a first-class pianist!" "My daughter is a chess prodigy!" Amy Chua, having been born during the Generation X generation, did show her mistakes as a boomer when she wrote Battle Hymn of a Tiger Mother with her Jewish-American husband, Atty. Jed Rubenfeld. 

Amy Chua was born to Chinese-Filipino parents. I guess the whole Chua surname already speaks volumes. She had already violated the older Chinese rule of never intermingling or intermarrying with other races. The late Bruce Lee was already taboo when he married his American wife who was back then, known as Linda Emery. Later, Linda remarried and became Linda Lee Cadwell. It was said Lee was antagonized by the American-Chinese community when he taught martial arts to "outsiders". It also seems very common for the Chinese to migrate here and there, form their communities, and they refuse to assimilate. Amy Chua's marriage to her husband Jed would already speak volumes of how it was frowned upon. I feel that Amy's marriage to an American man found the middle ground between Chinese and American parenting.

If I were to talk in Singlish (broken Chinese English), it'd probably sound like, "American parenting overly permissive! Chinese parently overly strict!" Amy Chua did write her book rather meticulously some of the bad things she's done. She's mentioned how it worked on Sophie but backfired with Lulu. I had a cringy moment when I realize that Chinese children hardly have a life. What's worse than not being able to play video games or watch TV (well, they can be very addicting) is when you can't get a grade lower than an A. For them, an A- is a bad grade. It's very common also that Chinese boomer parents tend to hammer their children saying, "You ought to be honor student ya because I was honor student ya!" Though, some of them are forcing their children to live their broken dreams such as the case of a certain American-Chinese, Sophie Xiong. 

It was an interesting read to see how both Amy Chua and Jed both had their differences. A man raised American. A Chinese-Filipino woman who became an American-Chinese at a young age. It was common for some Chinese-Filipinos to migrate to America. In my case, I wanted to migrate to America back in 2001. Jed did raise valid points when Amy Chua went too much. Eventually, Lulu managed to rebel. It was stressful to read how Lulu finally broke. As Amy Chua said, she was humbled by her second daughter. Later, Amy Chua made adjustments from Chinese authoritarian parenting in exchange for authoritative parenting. Being strict but not too strict would be the middle ground. That's what Amy did to Lulu later on. 

It was interesting to read what Amy Chua had to write. It's very hard to think that anybody would be willing to admit they failed. It seems that honor and reputation tend to be highly held in the Chinese family. They'd do anything for it even through demeaning and well-intentioned lies. For the child to finish their food, it's common to make little white lies instead of setting appropriate punishments. For the child to do better, they issue harsh empty threats. Instead, Amy Chua wrote what might be a warning of the fallacy of appealing to tradition. Many times, Chinese tradition has gone unquestioned resulting in many bad things. However, Chinese tradition isn't static. It's like how dog and cat meat is becoming more taboo in China. Chinese men used to marry multiple wives only for it to be abolished. Chinese overly controlling parenting is the same. It needs to be thrown into the same place with every absurd Chinese tradition. 

Popular posts from this blog

Facts vs. Gossip: The "Chona Mae" Incident is Proof You NEED to Verify What You Hear

It was in 2012 when the Chona Mae incident happened. I remember the panic when people were running the opposite direction while I was working at Downtown, Cebu. The traffic was bad. People were panikcing. But the real twist? It was actually a father looking for his daughter, whose identity we may never know.  The Cebu Daily News   said this last 2022, which was before entering the post-COVID world: CEBU CITY, Philippines — It has been a decade since the famous “Chona Mae” line was uttered by a father looking for her daughter after a 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the island of Cebu, February 6, 2012 .  From what was a simple call of a father to his daughter turned out to be the biggest tsunami scare in Cebu City.  “Ang tubig naa na sa Colon!” ("The Water is already in Colon!") was the line that has gotten everyone running on the street of Cebu looking for shelters up in the mountain parts of Cebu.  Today, we remember that frightful yet somehow funny day that w...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...

The 1986 Snap Elections Would Also Disprove the Myth of the "Marcos Parliament"

Anti-charter change proponents love to use Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. among their reasons, to defend their stand. The argument is that "charter change must be evil" because Marcos used it--a fallacy of Guilt by Association . Please, even Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo's supporter  Andrew James Masigan  supports charter change! Now, we must look at Marcos and remember another significant event. It's the 1986 snap elections and why it's also proof that we never had a parliamentary form of government. February 7, 1986, was when Marcos declared snap elections. Two years before the snap election, Marcos even declared that the Philippines was never a parliamentary government under him : The adoption of certain aspects of a parliamentary system in the amended Constitution does not alter its essentially presidential character . Article VII on the Presidency starts with this provision:  ‘the President shall be the Head of State and Chief Executive of the Republic of the Ph...

Why I Believe So Many Filipinos (Especially Boomers) Misunderstand (and Blindly Oppose) Charter Change

Okay, I'm no political analyst or historian. That doesn't mean I should just shut up and not share my opinion. I felt like I needed to publish this piece. This is where I want to examine another issue. I've noticed some people on Facebook are sharing the quotes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Some would try to do Ad Hominem attacks on me because I'm no constitutionalist (which I admit that I'm not). Just because I'm not a constitutionalist, doesn't mean, that I can't quote from the experts . Do I really need a degree in law at one of those prestigious universities in the Philippines? Sadly, some people are supposedly smarter than me but are the ones spreading nonsense.  Understanding charter change We need to see the definition first to understand why so many Filipinos, especially boomers , are so against it. The Philippine Star   gives this definition of charter change: Charter change, simply, is the process of introducing amendments or revisions to the ...