Skip to main content

Learning More About Pinyin and the Genius Behind It

I think one of the biggest problems of Filipino-Chinese schools and their Chinese education is the method. I remembered how we were taught zhuyin and pinyin wasn't really taught. We had to memorize long sentences. More often, Chinese language teachers tend to act like we were in China than the Philippines. It wasn't until later that I developed an interest in learning Mandarin. I developed a sudden taste for Chinese media. It was there I learned about the existence of another dialect known as Cantonese. Pinyin was barely taught. Instead, we were taught zhuyin which was still widely used in Taiwan. Zhuyin was the standard Chinese alphabet. Then there was pinyin which is the proper Romanization. 

We need to take a look at the history of pinyin with the late Zhou Yougang. He was born on January 13, 1906, and died on January 14, 2017. As I was using the Tao Li, I got curious and Googled the inventor of Pinyin. I'd dare say that the inventor himself is a plain genius. I do have a hard time believing he died at 111 years old since I have no relatives who died beyond the 100s. Pretty much, all of the younger photos of Zhou are now vintage photos. 


Pinyin and zhuyin both have a very divisive history. Back then, I had no idea how to do pinyin so I did romanizing wrong. The Chinese teachers hardly taught it back then. Instead, we had to settle for the bopomofo using the zhuyin. I even read how Taiwan did have some issues with pinyin as a "Communist invention". I read this from the Hutong School website: 

The split in Zhuyin versus Pinyin is almost entirely political. In an effort to spread literacy, promote Mandarin over local dialects, and “modernize” the country, the People’s Republic of China official adopted Hanyu Pinyin in the 1950s to replace Zhuyin (as well as other systems of Romanization). The ROC, however, viewed Pinyin as a “Communist invention” that was an antagonist to traditional Chinese culture. This attitude pushed them to continue using Zhuyin.

At the same time, some Taiwanese conservatives were alarmed at the ease people could learn to read without using Chinese characters! They didn’t consider this “legitimate learning” and forbid using this method to promote “full literacy.” Both Bopomofo and GR were restricted to annotating the pronunciation of Chinese characters. Bopomofo was renamed as 注音符號 ZhùyÄ«n Fúhào/Juhin Fwuhaw “National Phonetic Symbols” to emphasize its new, restricted role.

I think it's because Taiwan has tense relations with China. Many times, I feel Taiwan is still considered the true home of Chinese culture. Some of the multinational Chinese cuisines come from Taiwan or Hong Kong--two countries frequently bullied by Communist China. Yet, I'm glad that some Taiwanese conservatives saw the ease pinyin could bring. If only earlier Taiwanese politicians saw that the inventor of pinyin himself was also a victim of Communist China. Zhou was practically a victim of Mao Zedong's brutal regime during the 1950s but lived to tell about it. Liu Shaoqi wasn't so lucky as he ended up dying in jail. Later, Zhou became a vocal critic of Chinese corruption even after being re-educated during the Cultural Revolution. 

The big advantage of pinyin is that it's more open to non-Chinese speakers. One thing worth noting is that some Filipino-Chinese are only Chinese by blood. I, for one, even struggle with learning what's often called standard Chinese or 化语 (huá yÇ” or hua2 yu3). Also, most keyboards are using the English alphabet. It would be easier for non-Chinese speakers to slowly learn how to type in Chinese than if they had to look for a specialized keyboard. It's like I just need to type the pinyin and find the Chinese character I want. It's unlike zhuyin which requires to start all over from square one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Ninoy's Words, "We Had a Parliamentary Form of Government WITHOUT a Parliament!"

Some people on Facebook continually spread the lie, "The parliamentary form of government will never work because the Marcos Sr. years were a parliament!" The idea is incredibly stupid when you realize some old information that they probably ignored. It's a shame that some boomers refuse to surf the Internet to find decades-old information  that would prove it otherwise. Come on, are they even too lazy to order Third World to First written by the late Lee Kuan Yew and only use it to criticize the Marcoses?  With the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr., I really must highlight that he actually spilled out much truth in this speech done in Los Angeles in 1981: And so my friends, we started with an American-type constitution, we move to a British-type constitution.  We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament. Until 1978, we did not have a parliament. And yet, we were supposed to be a parliamentary from of government.  And Mr. Marcos said, ...

"Animal" (2004): A Controversial Satire Against the Chiong Sister Case Inconsistencies [Warning: Read at Your Own Discretion]

After many years of self-studying the Chiong Sisters Case , I have written several entries on the matter. In fact, I created what I call an "almost-ever-updating" review on Give Up Tomorrow , which was a documentary that challenged my views. I was hesitant to write this review, as it involves another sensitive issue. Some time later, I wrote an entry discussing another aspect of the Chiong Case, specifically  the issue of the late Federico "Toto" Natividad Jr. himself . I always thought it was an unethical issue. However, I was able to watch the film on YouTube (via a poor quality upload), and it doesn't seem that anyone from Natividad's estate is interested in fighting for the film's right to be distributed , not especially that Case Unclosed already came out in 2008, now available on GMA-7's official YouTube channel . Kara David did a meticulously good job featuring the Chiong mother, the Uy mother , and even another member of the " Run for Pa...

Let's Be Real: Term Limits Cause Political Dynasties to Spiral Out of Control

Inquirer There's always the obsession with political dynasties. There's also the obsession with term limits . Back in the 1990s, I remembered fearing charter change . I was afraid that the late Fidel V. Ramos might become a dictator. The talks that if a president would rule for more than six years--would be considered "frightening" or "nakakatakot" in Tagalog. I wrote an article where I wrote one staggering truth-- a  long reign isn't necessarily tyrannical and that a short reign isn't necessarily benevolent . In my discussion, I highlighted both Pol Pot and Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.--both deceased dictators. Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge dictatorship murdered millions in contrast to Marcos' regime. Of course, some people will say Pol Pot would've caused Cambodia to go extinct if he rhad eigned longer. I remember the logic that I was told back in elementary school. I was told that the reason why term limits are imposed is to prevent another Marcos-...