Skip to main content

Learn the Facts, Not Gossip, from Reading Lee Kuan Yew's "From Third World to First"

The Straits Times

I could remember ordering the book From Third World to First (sometime after electricity and Internet connection got restored) in January. I wanted a copy of the book but it's that hard to secure. So, I used Shoppee to order the book shipped from Indonesia. There's so much misinformation that I read on Facebook about Singapore. No, I'm not just talking about using the late Flor Contemplacion as an excuse. Instead, it's all about Singapore's development. I felt that my best "Christmas Gift" (it was bought with my savings, not given) was having a copy of this book. It was written by none other than the great statesman, the late Lee Kuan Yew, the father of Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. 

There are a lot of misconceptions about Singapore's progress. Some people have written on Facebook gossip about Singapore's progress. These are the following gossips I could read on Facebook such as:

  1. Singapore only opened to foreign direct investment (FDI) because it was a country with no natural resources.
  2. Singapore used protectionism to strengthen itself. It was only after it became a first-world country that it opened to FDI. 
  3. FDI didn't play a big part in Singapore's development from going from third-world to first-world.
  4. The Philippines can't learn from Singapore because of the latter's small size.
Those are but a few of the many gossip spreaders who can be called a MARITES. MARITES (though there's a real name for a woman called Marites) has become an acronym for Masters in Arts in Relaying Information Through Exaggerated Storytelling. It's also been a shortcut for the Tagalog phrase, "Mare, ito ang latest" (Translation: Mam, this is the latest). The stories about how Singapore flourished can be as tainted as the so-called innocence of the late Flor Contemplacion. 

The book itself is rather thick. There are two parts. The first part has Lee Kuan Yew discussing "Getting the Basics Right". The second part is "In Search of Space--Regional and International". Lee was a man who once tried protectionism, only to discover that if they needed jobs, they needed to open up the economy. That would put the very claim that Singapore used protectionism to power itself up is proven false. Lee Kuan Yew even stated that would have they waited for their businesses to boom then Singapore would've starved.

I had a lot of fun reading about the views of economists on that day. Just reading the common school of thought that multinational corporations (MNCs) are supposedly exploiters. Lee Kuan Yew and Go Kweng See weren't impressed by the idea. After trying and testing, they both realized protectionism wasn't going to work. Instead, they decided to open the Singaporean economy to FDI. Lee Kuan Yew defied all odds also by hiring the help of Dutch economist, Albert Winsemius. The whole stage was set when Lee Kuan Yew adopted the FDI model to help Singapore. 

It was also fun reading about greening up Singapore. I went to Singapore very impressed at how the place is so clean. At first, I felt that the Philippines should be disciplined to develop another Singapore. Lee Kuan Yew did say that Filipinos need more discipline than democracy in the same book. However, it's important to take the whole book into its context. Just reading from the second part of the book in Chapter 18 was enlightening. It talked about the Philippines. The Philippines really does need more discipline than democracy. However, can the Philippines have democracy without economic development? I wanted to achieve a green Philippines but it seems a modified model for the Philippines will do.

The idea that the Philippines can't imitate Singapore in any way is just dumb. The book featured other countries. The book also features bigger countries that emulated Singapore. Vietnam is a country rich in natural resources. Vietnam was still poorer than Singapore until the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi (who died a centenarian) followed the Singaporean model. We also have much-bigger China under Deng Xiaoping. Lee Kuan Yew later praised Deng Xiaoping as a great man. The two communist nations finally saw the foolishness of the old model. Instead, free markets have allowed Vietnam and China to rise above the likes of North Korea. Interestingly, Lee Kuan Yew called himself a socialist but he was for free markets and was against the welfare state idea. Vietnam still considers itself a socialist state while being for free markets. 

It would also talk about the Lee Political Dynasty. It's often said that political dynasties are always bad. It's not the case if the family members are good. If one thinks about Lee's family, Lee Hsien Loong has become the prime minister for more than 10 years. Lee Hsien Loong had to prove himself, unlike political dynasties in a presidential system. That's why I'm going to be vocal about the Philippines going for a parliamentary system. Without a parliamentary system, there will be no Lee Kuan Yew and no Mahathir Mohamad. 

I believe that this book needs to be made more accessible. The Philippines really needs to learn from this book pretty badly. I believe that the Philippines can become an economic power. It has the potential to rise above the ASEAN. However, it has been hindered by issues like the Filipino First Policy. This book can help become a better guide. It helped Vietnam, it helped China, it helped India, and I don't see any reason why it couldn't help the Philippines. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...
Read more

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...
Read more

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...
Read more

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...
Read more

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...
Read more