Skip to main content

A Royal Gossip That'll Still Go On: The Alleged Paternity of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

I guess gossip hardly dies, right? The British Royalty did install Princes Charles as King Charles III. I have watched a few episodes of the British royalty which is but symbolic now. A rumor that came out decades ago was the alleged paternity of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. I guess no matter how much one shouts it--some people will either never get it or refuse to get it. This is a rumor that Prince Harry's real father is allegedly a certain James Hewitt, a former British army officer. Yes, the late Princess Diana of Wales did confess she had an affair with Hewitt. However, the timeline doesn't add up to the bizarre (and obviously false claim) of Prince Harry's alleged paternity!

From The Daily Beast, Hewitt blamed the media saying these words, "It sells papers. It’s worse for him, probably, poor chap." I really can't help but agree with Hewitt on that statement that it's all about selling papers. Gossip is very juicy. Sitting down to discuss facts in a history class or seminar isn't as fun, am I right? It would be something to think about resemblances. True,, there are doppelgangers. Some say that James Hewitt is the father because of certain resemblances. However, doing the math, Prince Harry was born in 1984 and the affair between Princess Diana and Hewitt happened in 1986. The rumor just refuses to die as the bald patch now makes some foolish people think Hewitt is the real father.

Here's a photo from Elle which shows us the 10 times that Prince Harry looks like his late paternal grandfather, Prince Philip. I'm seeing more of a similarity between Prince Harry and his paternal grandfather than I'm seeing it with Hewitt. It's sad that even after these photos were released proving that Prince Harry is indeed the grandson of Prince Philip--the gossip lives on. If there's been a bald spot then why not look at King Charles III's bald spot too?

This analysis from The Daily Star will further show that the resemblance between Prince Harry to Hewitt is superficial. Deeper details will reveal how it's impossible and just made to sell papers. The juicy gossip can be easily disproven when Hewitt's features such as his brown eyes, dark red-brown hair, and smaller canines will totall show it's just impossible. Yet, we've got idiots on social media as well as broadcasting sites still saying stuff like, "Hewitt is the real father, trust me bro." Again, the statement "Trust Me Bro" makes a very poor source! If you can't back up your claims then don't make the claim!

Even more, here's Prince Harry compared to his father and paternal grandfather. The younger photos of Prince Philip really resemble Prince Harry. The resemblances between Prince Harry to his paternal grandfather are too strong to ignore. Who could ever forget that King Charles III has a bald spot too? Prince Philip also had a bald spot in his later years! 

The evidence of Harry's paternity towards King Charles III is way stronger. Yet, you still have people who love to raise it that, "No! Impossible! It's really James Hewitt!" You can even share the timeline of when Prince Harry was born vs. when Princess Diana met her first paramour Hewitt. You can even show the similarities. Yet, facts don't help you win an argument if the person is too convinced by the gossip. Gossip is overly appealing. It somehow gives people who gossip that "sense of importance". 

This is cognitive dissonance. Photos of Prince Harry's resemblance to his paternal grandfather are out. There's discomfort among people who still believe in the now disproven lie that Prince Harry is indeed not a spurious member of the Royal House of Windsor. Yet, you'll always have it, "No! No! Trust me bro! Harry's father is James Hewitt." That's why the gossip goes on because for some, the best source is, "Trust me bro!" 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Okay, We've Heard These Wise Words by the Late Luis V. Teodoro, But Ever Heard of His Words About th PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM?!

There's nothing wrong with complaining. Complaining can be counterproductive. However, the problem with the likes of Butthurt Philippines (where I got the quote above) is that they'd rather stick to complaining than get the solutions. Even worse, it seems that the administrator of the Butthurt Philippines Facebook page is that he'd rather look at me as some "DDS troll". Is that the best answer that its owner, who I heard is Lico Reloj (if that's his real name) could even come up with? They'd dismiss me because I'm part of the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum. I've been insulted for my supposed poor ability in detecting sarcasm. Maybe I should've researched word elongation to detect sarcasm. However, with the way Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page carries things--I doubt it that it's productive complaining.  The quote by the late Luis V. Teodoro is right. I was reminded of why I wanted to move out of the Philippines. I always fel...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pol Pot's Brutal Regime May Be Summarized by "Hating Everyone Better Than Him"

Documentation Center of Cambodia Archives Two days ago, on April 17, 1975, marked the 50th year since Pol Pot (real name, Saloth Sar) rose to power. The Khmer Rouge only ruled for four years, but it showed one thing--a reign of less than six years isn't necessarily benevolent (read here ). A look at Pol Pot's past may show that he was the typical inggitero--the Filipino word for someone who's easily jealous of others! The History website reveals this brutal detail on Pol Pot's regime, which was most likely fueled by jealousy : Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. During that time, an estimated 1.5 to 2 million Cambodians died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. One detention center, S-21, was so notorious that only seven of the roughly 20,000 people imprisoned there are known to have survived. The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless communist society, took particular ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cooking Mud Crabs: Why the Color Changes

Above is a GIF I created. After writing on crab mentality and the Filipino First Policy --I got inspired to write about why mud crabs change color. Mud crab dishes are one of my favorite foods in Surigao City. The color is dark but when it's cooked, it goes red. The Tavern Hotel is among the best places to get a mud crab dish.  Now, it's time to do science as a daily hobby. Sure, I'm no chemist or biochemist. However, researching and studying science as a hobby is sure fun. Here's an explanation from The Conversation : A crustacean’s exoskeletons contain several chemicals called pigments, which give the crabs and prawns their colour. One of these is an orange-ey pigment called “astaxanthin”. This is a member of the family of pigments that is responsible for colouring many of the yellow, orange and red animals. When the crustaceans are alive, the astaxanthin is tightly wrapped up and trapped by a special protein called “crustacyanin”. This is why live crabs and prawns us...
Post a Comment
Read more