Skip to main content

A Royal Gossip That'll Still Go On: The Alleged Paternity of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

I guess gossip hardly dies, right? The British Royalty did install Princes Charles as King Charles III. I have watched a few episodes of the British royalty which is but symbolic now. A rumor that came out decades ago was the alleged paternity of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. I guess no matter how much one shouts it--some people will either never get it or refuse to get it. This is a rumor that Prince Harry's real father is allegedly a certain James Hewitt, a former British army officer. Yes, the late Princess Diana of Wales did confess she had an affair with Hewitt. However, the timeline doesn't add up to the bizarre (and obviously false claim) of Prince Harry's alleged paternity!

From The Daily Beast, Hewitt blamed the media saying these words, "It sells papers. It’s worse for him, probably, poor chap." I really can't help but agree with Hewitt on that statement that it's all about selling papers. Gossip is very juicy. Sitting down to discuss facts in a history class or seminar isn't as fun, am I right? It would be something to think about resemblances. True,, there are doppelgangers. Some say that James Hewitt is the father because of certain resemblances. However, doing the math, Prince Harry was born in 1984 and the affair between Princess Diana and Hewitt happened in 1986. The rumor just refuses to die as the bald patch now makes some foolish people think Hewitt is the real father.

Here's a photo from Elle which shows us the 10 times that Prince Harry looks like his late paternal grandfather, Prince Philip. I'm seeing more of a similarity between Prince Harry and his paternal grandfather than I'm seeing it with Hewitt. It's sad that even after these photos were released proving that Prince Harry is indeed the grandson of Prince Philip--the gossip lives on. If there's been a bald spot then why not look at King Charles III's bald spot too?

This analysis from The Daily Star will further show that the resemblance between Prince Harry to Hewitt is superficial. Deeper details will reveal how it's impossible and just made to sell papers. The juicy gossip can be easily disproven when Hewitt's features such as his brown eyes, dark red-brown hair, and smaller canines will totall show it's just impossible. Yet, we've got idiots on social media as well as broadcasting sites still saying stuff like, "Hewitt is the real father, trust me bro." Again, the statement "Trust Me Bro" makes a very poor source! If you can't back up your claims then don't make the claim!

Even more, here's Prince Harry compared to his father and paternal grandfather. The younger photos of Prince Philip really resemble Prince Harry. The resemblances between Prince Harry to his paternal grandfather are too strong to ignore. Who could ever forget that King Charles III has a bald spot too? Prince Philip also had a bald spot in his later years! 

The evidence of Harry's paternity towards King Charles III is way stronger. Yet, you still have people who love to raise it that, "No! Impossible! It's really James Hewitt!" You can even share the timeline of when Prince Harry was born vs. when Princess Diana met her first paramour Hewitt. You can even show the similarities. Yet, facts don't help you win an argument if the person is too convinced by the gossip. Gossip is overly appealing. It somehow gives people who gossip that "sense of importance". 

This is cognitive dissonance. Photos of Prince Harry's resemblance to his paternal grandfather are out. There's discomfort among people who still believe in the now disproven lie that Prince Harry is indeed not a spurious member of the Royal House of Windsor. Yet, you'll always have it, "No! No! Trust me bro! Harry's father is James Hewitt." That's why the gossip goes on because for some, the best source is, "Trust me bro!" 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Favorite Source of Information "Trust Me Bro"?

It's something to think about Facebook comments section , right? I can't decide if I should allow unmoderated comments. The world of comments can be so annoying these days.   It's one thing if one comments for constructive criticism . However, one could really think about how many comments (even under Anonymous or troll accounts) are just there to derail. News about the Philippines' getting newer reforms such as more foreign direct investments (FDIs) have a lot of stupid comments too. I'm not surprised with comments such as, "It's Duterte's gift to China!" or "Allowing foreign telecommunication companies will risk our security!" When I ask for the sources on Facebook, I tend to get the argument that's as foolish as, "Trust me bro!" A lack of intelligence is one thing. It's another thing to ignore common sense. This meme makes me laugh at the pyramid of learning. Okay, I have a high school diploma during K+10. I soon had ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Today in History: Revisiting the Late Martin Ocampo's Demise

  An injustice for one is an injustice for the whole community . What people never thought that in their demand for blood--the wrong people were caught! It turns out that Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga was in Quezon City when the Chiong sisters went missing (read here ). On October 7, 1999, the trial judge who had doubts about the body found in the ravine was found dead in Waterfront, Lapu-Lapu. The incident happened while I was still in my  second year of high school . There was not much access to the Internet back then nor was it viewed as a necessity, unlike today! Back then, I felt Ocampo was murdered. There was allegedly some hair sample that was his--probably his mistress. However, forensics expert Dr. Raquel Fortun has concluded it was suicide . Dr. Fortun also showed up in the documentary Give Up Tomorrow which highlights two things--a crime that remains unsolved and how Paco was wrongfully arrested. Paco admitted on Dong Puno Live that he and Josman Aznar have a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...
Post a Comment
Read more