Skip to main content

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

 

This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos." 

I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos' regime. Marcos was never formally installed as president or prime minister. Cesar Virata was nothing more than an executive assistant. That's why I challenge them to go ahead and tell that to parliamentary countries, that the Philippines truly had a parliamentary system during the Marcos Years!

There's always such a thing as being stuck in a comfort zone 

Come on, Mrs. Robles unfortunately shot her own foot when she said the following:

On the part of Marcos, his 1973 Constitution provided for a Vice-President but this post was only made available during the snap election in 1986. Marcos was allergic to vice-presidents, having quarreled with his vice-president, Fernando Lopez, whom he accused of plotting against him. Sounds familiar?

The 1986 Edsa People Power put an end to Marcos’ semi-presidential-parliamentary set-up and restored the presidential form of government with all its checks and balances.

Duterte has made no bones about his deep dislike for checks and balances. In August last year, Duterte threatened to declare Martial Law if Chief Justice Lourdes Sereno stopped his war on drugs. In the same month, Duterte also threatened to shut down Congress if it bungled his plan to change the Constitution and set up a parliamentary-federal system.

The fruit of the 1986 Edsa people Power is the 1986 Constitution.

Robles already mentioned it was semi-presidential. It was still a presidential system nonetheless. Just because there was a prime minister, doesn't mean that there was a parliamentary form of government (read here). Robles already had the details that it was still a presidential government. The prime minister's role in Marcos' government wasn't the same as Lee Kuan Yew. It's a shame how Filipinos quote LKY on the Marcoses but not follow his sound advice for the rest. 

A good example of a comfort zone is the Chiong Sisters Case. The narrative heard back in 1997-1999 wasn't even complete! I watched this episode of Case Unclosed on YouTube (above). I was shocked when somebody told me that Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga was innocent of the crime. Paco still had the right to defend himself. Sadly, Paco wasn't given the right to testify. Josman Aznar whose offenses weren't that huge, is still in jail over a crime he never committed. Some people still believe in the "testimony" of Davidson V. Rusia (read here) instead of the evidence that proved Paco's innocence. Just because someone is a bad boy and a possible suitor of the victim (which Paco denied courting Marijoy). They ignored the overwhelming evidence that Paco couldn't do the crime. They were too used to Davidson's daily "testimony", which had several inconsistencies.

The same went for Hubert Jeffry P. Webb's wrongful conviction, during the Vizconde Massacre Trial. Some people still believe Hubert was guilty, probably due to whatever wrongs he did in the past. Some people still believe in The Tolentino Blunder. Atty. Amelita G. Tolentino refused the DNA test--something that could've helped solve the case. If the DNA sample was tested, it could've pointed ot a different suspect. However, some people still wholeheartedly chose to believe in Jessica Alfaro's lies (read here).

Given the two crimes I mentioned (both in the 1990s), some people are still stuck with whatever narrative they get. Remembering my Civics and Culture up to Philippine History subject (Grade 1-First Year High School) in the 1990s, things are rushed. We're often told about how Marcos used charter change to become a dictator. After that, charter change is viewed as "evil" because of Marcos. However, that's a guilt-by-association fallacy. Charter change isn't necessarily evil. Not even Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino intended that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, be the "forever constitution" of the Philippines!

Some people refuse to get out of their comfort zone of knowledge. It may be because they're stroking their ego. After all, they have a high grade on that exam. They may have gotten high scores reporting about the Vizconde Massacre Case or the Chiong Sisters Case. They may have perfectly enumerated the suspects. They may still be clinging on to that high grade in the exam. The same may go if they cling to their high grade in the quiz about the Martial Law years. I'm not saying that the books are completely wrong. The books aren't completely right either! That's why there's always room for correction and updates! Any good teacher continues to learn. A bad teacher stops learning and seeks to stick to the status quo.

An article from Linkedin points out to this critical truth:

There are several reasons why some baby boomers may resist learning or changing:

  • Cognitive rigidity: As people age, their cognitive abilities may decline, making it more difficult for them to learn new information or adapt to change.
  • Fear of the unknown: Baby boomers may feel uncomfortable with new technologies or social norms that challenge their worldview and way of life.
  • Resistance to criticism: Baby boomers may feel that they have already achieved a certain level of success and do not want to be criticized or challenged by others.
  • Cultural and social influences: Baby boomers may have been raised in a culture that values conformity and stability, which can make it difficult for them to embrace new ideas or behaviors.

Some people may think that just because they graduated cum laude from 19-forgotten that they know everything. That's why there are some cum laudes who never did anything significant with their lives. I blame the reasons above more than I blame their being cum laude. Some cum laudes are still doing well even after school. However, some cum laudes fail when they refuse to adapt to change, fear the unknown for the sake of it, become resistant to criticism (believing their successes made them invincible), and influences can cause that behavior.

It's also the reason why some businesses fail. Take Nokia for example. They used to be leading brands. That's why it can become useless to tell children, "When your father was your age, he was already this and that." What year was that? It's 19-forgotten? It's 20-forgotten? Schooling was easier during their time compared to today. They may have succeeded with their Flintstones technology (an exaggeration) but can they still do it now. 

In insisting on the comfort zone, the Philippines continues to decline in failure. Staying with the Marcos parliamentary system narrative is just one of them. How can people who claim to fight against fake news, spread that fake news? If they're serious about fact-checking, why not fact-check the Marcos Years all over again to check if it was a real parliamentary system? 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...
Read more

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T...
Read more

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...
Read more

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...
Read more