The Philippines Has Many Dumb Ways to Vote, Thanks to the Presidential System

-


 Above is a hilariously stupid video called "Dumb Ways to Vote". I remember back in the 2010s when I said, "How can the Philippines become better if Filipinos don't vote wisely?" I would spell out things like, "When will Filipinos learn to vote for doctors, lawyers, and economists instead of actors and athletes who know nothing about politics?" What's even stranger is that the same people addicted to personality politics (and I even assume that both Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo and President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. won because of personality politics) throw Ad Hominem attacks towards Senator Robinhood Padilla, who's still pushing for charter change. Some would call him names like Boy Chili or remind people of his already ex-convict status. I didn't vote for Padilla because I've had enough of voting for athletes and actors. However, I prefer to backfire, "Do you ever wonder why Robin Padilla won first place in the Senate, during the 2022 elections?" These people choose to blame the voters instead of the system that allowed the voters to even vote for Padilla!

The presidential system creates too many dumb voters because people vote based on popularity 

If I recall correctly, former president Joseph Marcelo Ejercito aka Joseph Estrada, was on the cover of Time Magazine. The caption said, "Is he unstoppable?" Jose De Venecia, who was House Speaker at that time, was more qualified to sit for president. Right now, some people say that Mrs. Robredo is more fit than Marcos Jr. However, it may be because of Marcos Jr.'s father, the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.--who caused so much controversy such as the Marcos Wealth issue and his widow Imelda Romualdez-Marcos' massive shoe collection. After watching The Kingmaker--I'm not going to deny there's massive plunder that was involved. However, Marcos Jr. won anyway, even if the promise of PHP 20.00 kilo rice is obviously unfeasible, to begin with. 

People can say, "It's not the system! It's just the people! It's just the voters!" Do I need to state over and over again that systems influence behavior? Some people still say, "But the people make the system!" I wonder if such people are demanding a "perfect leader"-- something that they would need to create (which is impossible). Some even used Mrs. Robredo as an example that there's no need to amend even one part of the "sacred" 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. The big question is what's Article XVII for anyway? Just for a decorative piece? That's why I even wrote an article asking if the framers are willing to amend Article XVII to make the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, to make it unamendable. That would be a dilemma that they really need to answer! That means if the Philippine constitution will be amended--there's even going to be the need to replace it. The 1987 Constitution may not be entirely faulty. However, even one fault can totally disrupt the flow or even give full implementation!

Even worse, these people still insist on the same lie over and over again that the first Marcos Administration was supposedly a "parliamentary system" (read here). When I raised the late Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad, they would say, "Eh, that's just a matter of a strong leader!" However, I wrote a simple refutation on that (read here). If we're going to consider the circumstances set towards the two great leaders I mentioned vs. any Filipino leader--they're really that different. For other people, they would call me demeaning names and say nonsense stuff like, "Are you a traitor to our country? Why not listen to the Monsods and the great Atty. Hilario Davide Jr.?" The Monsod couple (who are namely Atty. Christian Monsod and Solita Collas-Monsod) and Davide can talk all they want. However, Mohamad isn't giving advice from an ivory tower. Mohamad is talking about his experience as a prime minister in Malaysia. In short, would Filipinos really vote for a Filipino candidate, who like Mohamad, is described by the Philippine Star as, "Tough-talking, brutally frank and often abrasive"? 

The real issue is that people wouldn't vote wisely because the system encourages popularity-based politics. Let's say that one day, a tough-talking, brutally frank candidate, and often abrasive competent leader shows up. Now, the other candidate is a popular movie actor. The results were clear when de Venecia and Estrada ran against each other. De Venecia proved himself to be the better person. However, Estrada won anyway because of how popular he was. Should the people keep doing EDSA protests which may not always be successful? Please, don't give EDSA too much credit as the late Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi also did a similar protest. Gandhi's writing inspired the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. in the peaceful protests. Aquino Jr. even pointed out the harsh reality that, "We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament!" (read here). So much for claiming that the first Marcos Administration was a "parliamentary system", especially when LKY, who ruled a real parliamentary government, called Cesar Virata a non-starter. Virata as a prime minister, was only an executive assistant, like a chief minister to a ruling king or president. The South Korean government has a prime minister but it's still presidential overall.

How will the parliamentary system help remedy that? 

I'm not calling for a magical solution but a real one. I don't claim the parliamentary system is perfect. No system is perfect, far from it. However, the parliamentary system is based on parties. It doesn't mean absolution of an election like what Marcos Sr. did during his mockery of a "parliament". People will vote by parties based on their platforms. For example, the candidates would be PDP-Laban and the Liberal Party of the Philippines. Right now, the Liberal Party of the Philippines could've been the opposition if we were in the parliamentary system. That means Mrs. Robredo and her party will be responsible for questioning Marcos Jr. and his party. However, becoming a prime minister is no easy feat. Take for example that Singapore has rigid requirements before one can even dream of leading the nation. After doing some readings, I have the right to doubt that Marcos Jr. would've even been leading the nation now if the Philippines had a parliamentary system. If Marcos Jr. didn't follow the steps in a parliamentary system--no one can expect him to sit as prime minister. Marcos Jr. can still expect to be removed by a vote of no confidence--if he ever became prime minister! 

Sure, it may first start with the same set of people. However, parliamentary elections are party-focused. That means no more dance numbers or focus on figures. That means the Liberal Party of the Philippines would try to treat Mrs. Robredo, Atty. Leila De Lima, Manuel A. Roxas Jr., Atty. Jose Manuel "Chel" Diokno, Atty. Florin Hilbay, etc. like celebrities or by name recall. Instead, the focus of the Liberal Party of the Philippines is what it aims to do. That means even if the Liberal Party of the Philippines wins the Government seats, choosing the prime minister shouldn't be based on popularity but on credibility. What should also be noted is that if the Liberal Party of the Philippines should ever lose but gather enough support--the members become the Opposition. The Liberal Party of the Philippines will be required to form its Opposition or Shadow Government. If Mrs. Robredo is qualified to lead it, why not? Mrs. Robredo wouldn't be the focus but her entire party. It would force people to behave properly because they carry the name of the party. 

No gossip, no hearsay, face-to-face debates,
liars are slapped in the parliamentary system!

Even better, people will know which party is doing better because of the weekly question hour. Let's give a scenario of how it works. Party A (headed by Marcos Jr.) is face-to-face with Party B (headed by Mrs. Robredo). For example, if Atty. De Lima should challenge Marcos Jr.--it's not going to be in the comfort of her own office. Instead, Atty. De Lima would challenge her direct counterpart in Marcos Jr.'s cabinet. Party B holds Party A accountable through the debates. Fears of so many traps (dirty rags) in the Parliament? Well, that can be remedied because of the penalizing system. It's broadcast live on television and it can be shameful to be unable to answer. Even better, it's done weekly. Party A vs. Party B would be facing off against each other--not the Opposition making individual press conferences. Party A members and Party B members are required to behave professionally, because they carry the name of their parties. The Opposition directly questions the government.


Amazingly, the colors here are akin to Marcos Jr., Sara Duterte-Carpio, Mrs. Robredo, and Atty. Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan. Right now, Pangilinan would be the Deputy Opposition Leader if Mrs. Robredo were the Opposition Leader. The members of both Party A and Party B debate each other. Marcos Jr. begins the line with 7.5 minutes, followed by Mrs. Robredo, and up to the next set of ministers and shadow ministers. It's a "we" than "I", which means teamwork. That means whatever concerns that a party member brings, is unified. Both teams would show which members are fit for their office and not fit for the office. The prime minister or any party member doesn't need to do a crime to be removed. Instead, it's all about losing the confidence in one's ability to lead. For example, if the prime minister keeps saying stuff like, "I didn't know...", "I don't know..." or "It's the fault of the previous administration..."--it could easily yank off the prime minister. The same applies to people who aren't doing their jobs. 

It's time to get out of the familiar territory just because it's familiar. I'm not saying the Philippines should enter into unfamiliar waters, because it's unfamiliar. Instead, we're talking about the results of parliamentary countries. Critics have passed me saying, "Where can you show that the Philippines will be better with a parliamentary system! Listen to Monsod and Davide..." accompanied by an insult. I'd like to ask, "Where's any study that will prove that the parliamentary system will make us worse? That study should come from a first world country and not just Monsod and Davide!" 

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-
Image
As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow -- a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia --it was really a trial by gossip . In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro.  I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how cou
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more