Skip to main content

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

 

People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late. 

Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this:

It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is change in people. So you have enough of the structures, legal and constitutional.

Then, we've got a lot of Okay Boomers who still think that Davide Jr.'s words are near infallible. I guess that old man with the toga blocked me not just for being annoying to him. It's probably because he prefers to have his ego stroked by those he agrees with. Not surprisingly, Davide Jr. told Rappler and Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño is also part of the same organization. There are always those who still defend the idea that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is 'the best in the world" quote Davide Jr. as their favorite source. If not Davide Jr., the Monsod couple namely Christian and Winnie, are also quoted.

However, the education system of the Philippines has proven to suck in global standards. I wonder if I wasted my time in going to business school. I only learned to invest in stocks through stock funds, not in school. Back on the topic, I really think about the whole Philippines vs. Singapore argument. Another stubborn boomer keeps saying, "How many times do I have to tell you that the Philippines isn't Singapore!" Some people still believe that the late Flor Contemplacion was innocent. 

However, one must question if Davide Jr. himself really did use his time well as a United Nations (UN) diplomat. CoRRECT Movement used the Davide Jr. vs. John Gokongwei Jr. comparison. For me, that is a poor comparison until we compare him to a big-time policymaker like Mahbubani. Mahbubani is the founder of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) and having joined the World Economic Forum is a huge plus. I wonder how Mahbubani would react if he heard Davide Jr.'s statements about foreign investors.  

Just listening to Mahbubani talk, I could say why I chose to listen to him. Sure, I could really go from DDS to Dilawan to DDS. However, it's quite fortunate some Dilawans have already seen the need for constitutional reform like the late Charles Edward P. Celdran. Mahbubani offers practical insights and has given not just words but evidence. I read through From Third World to First would shoot a lot of claims down. The late Lee Kuan Yew himself had written words that would prove that Singapore opened up before it became a first-world country. 

Unfortunately, some people will probably just throw offensive racist jokes at Mahbubani. It's because he's what many will call a Bumbay in the Filipino language. All the racist jokes can be thrown at the other grandfather. Sure, Mahbubani is 13 years younger than Davide Jr. However, some old people are rightfully called "tumandang walang pinag-aralan". In English, that's having grown old without learning anything. Mahbubani is a wise old man. I could dare say that Davide Jr. had shown himself to be a foolish old man in his quest to defend the "best constitution".

LKY himself even mentioned this with the late Fidel V. Ramos: 

He (Ramos, emphasis mine) knew well the difficulties of trying to govern with strict American-style separation of powers. The Senate had already defeated Mrs. Aquino's proposal to retain the American bases. The Philippines had a rambunctious press but it did not check corruption. Individual press reporters could be bought, as could many judges. Something had gone seriously wrong. Millions of Filipino men and women had to leave their country for jobs abroad beneath their level of education. Filipino professionals whom we recruited to work in Singapore are as good as our own. Indeed, their architects, artists, and musicians are more artistic and creative than ours. Hundreds of them have left for Hawaii and for the American mainland. It is a problem the solution which has not been made easier by the workings of a Philippine version of the American constitution. 

The problem has been that there are still millions of Filipinos leaving the country, looking for jobs. Eve worse, LKY mentioned that those are jobs beneath their level of education. Why keep quoting LKY about the Marcoses when one can quote the former about how to improve the Philippines? LKY knew how to turn Singapore from a third-world country into a first world. Mahbubani saw Singapore rise up and he could speak from experience. Davide Jr. can quote a lot all he wants. However, the Philippines is yet to reach Singapore's level. 

I think it's because Davide Jr. has become their convenient echo chamber. It's about what suits their narrative instead of the evidence they need. Even worse, when I ask for evidence, all they do is throw insults on my face. However, as Socrates would say, "Insults are the loser's tool." 

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...