Skip to main content

Hilario Davide Jr.'s Still Quoted by Anti-Constitutional Reform Fools on Social Media

 

People can falsely accuse me of colonial mentality because I've been quoting Kishore Mahbuban over Hilario G. Davide. I'm really sorry to say but I'm seeing various Facebook posts like La Verite (and the Pinocchio really fits it), the Rule of Law Sentinel, Silent No More PH, and many more anti-reform Facebook pages (and very ironic too) quote Davide Jr. a lot. It's straightforward to say that Davide Jr. has been the favorite source of such people. An old man with a toga (who blocked me) also often quoted Davide Jr. Also, Davide Jr. turned 88 years old last December 20. I wish I had written this earlier but sometimes it's better late than never. In my case, it's better never late. 

Davide Jr. also mentioned that the 1987 Constitution is "the best in the world". It's easy to spew out words but can he defend his claims? One of his old statements went like this:

It’s not change of structures, [whether] it would be federalism or parliamentary. It is change in people. So you have enough of the structures, legal and constitutional.

Then, we've got a lot of Okay Boomers who still think that Davide Jr.'s words are near infallible. I guess that old man with the toga blocked me not just for being annoying to him. It's probably because he prefers to have his ego stroked by those he agrees with. Not surprisingly, Davide Jr. told Rappler and Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño is also part of the same organization. There are always those who still defend the idea that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is 'the best in the world" quote Davide Jr. as their favorite source. If not Davide Jr., the Monsod couple namely Christian and Winnie, are also quoted.

However, the education system of the Philippines has proven to suck in global standards. I wonder if I wasted my time in going to business school. I only learned to invest in stocks through stock funds, not in school. Back on the topic, I really think about the whole Philippines vs. Singapore argument. Another stubborn boomer keeps saying, "How many times do I have to tell you that the Philippines isn't Singapore!" Some people still believe that the late Flor Contemplacion was innocent. 

However, one must question if Davide Jr. himself really did use his time well as a United Nations (UN) diplomat. CoRRECT Movement used the Davide Jr. vs. John Gokongwei Jr. comparison. For me, that is a poor comparison until we compare him to a big-time policymaker like Mahbubani. Mahbubani is the founder of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) and having joined the World Economic Forum is a huge plus. I wonder how Mahbubani would react if he heard Davide Jr.'s statements about foreign investors.  

Just listening to Mahbubani talk, I could say why I chose to listen to him. Sure, I could really go from DDS to Dilawan to DDS. However, it's quite fortunate some Dilawans have already seen the need for constitutional reform like the late Charles Edward P. Celdran. Mahbubani offers practical insights and has given not just words but evidence. I read through From Third World to First would shoot a lot of claims down. The late Lee Kuan Yew himself had written words that would prove that Singapore opened up before it became a first-world country. 

Unfortunately, some people will probably just throw offensive racist jokes at Mahbubani. It's because he's what many will call a Bumbay in the Filipino language. All the racist jokes can be thrown at the other grandfather. Sure, Mahbubani is 13 years younger than Davide Jr. However, some old people are rightfully called "tumandang walang pinag-aralan". In English, that's having grown old without learning anything. Mahbubani is a wise old man. I could dare say that Davide Jr. had shown himself to be a foolish old man in his quest to defend the "best constitution".

LKY himself even mentioned this with the late Fidel V. Ramos: 

He (Ramos, emphasis mine) knew well the difficulties of trying to govern with strict American-style separation of powers. The Senate had already defeated Mrs. Aquino's proposal to retain the American bases. The Philippines had a rambunctious press but it did not check corruption. Individual press reporters could be bought, as could many judges. Something had gone seriously wrong. Millions of Filipino men and women had to leave their country for jobs abroad beneath their level of education. Filipino professionals whom we recruited to work in Singapore are as good as our own. Indeed, their architects, artists, and musicians are more artistic and creative than ours. Hundreds of them have left for Hawaii and for the American mainland. It is a problem the solution which has not been made easier by the workings of a Philippine version of the American constitution. 

The problem has been that there are still millions of Filipinos leaving the country, looking for jobs. Eve worse, LKY mentioned that those are jobs beneath their level of education. Why keep quoting LKY about the Marcoses when one can quote the former about how to improve the Philippines? LKY knew how to turn Singapore from a third-world country into a first world. Mahbubani saw Singapore rise up and he could speak from experience. Davide Jr. can quote a lot all he wants. However, the Philippines is yet to reach Singapore's level. 

I think it's because Davide Jr. has become their convenient echo chamber. It's about what suits their narrative instead of the evidence they need. Even worse, when I ask for evidence, all they do is throw insults on my face. However, as Socrates would say, "Insults are the loser's tool." 

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...