Was Flor Contemplacion Innocent as Some May Claim She Was?

-

2020 became the 25th death anniversary of Flor Contemplacion. The "celebrations" came to a halt because of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was way back in 1995, during the rule of the late former Philippine president, Fidel R. Ramos, when it happened. It did spark a lot of discussion of whether or not Flor was innocent or not. It became a call for national outcry though another case was ongoing at that time namely the Vizconde Massacre case. Poor Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb was falsely accused of a crime he couldn't have committed. Meanwhile, I feel that there was a stark contrast that happened. Why is there a stark contrast? Maybe, it's time to read and find out as we explore another old history topic. This is about Flor's execution in the nation of Singapore. 

I remember talking about trying to turn the Philippines into another Singapore. Some people are still too stuck with bad sentiments regarding Singapore because of the execution of Flor. It's not as if Singapore is the only country with wrongful executions. Yet, Flor was popularized as such like she was a heroine. I heard that former Philippine president Rodrigo R. Duterte did protest. Ramos nearly cut ties with Singapore and then decided it was time to "move on". Ramos has had dealings with the late Lee Kuan Yew and former Singaporean prime minister, Goh Chok Kong. I felt the sentiment was, "What? Do you want us to be like Singapore? Just remember our fellow Filipino, Flor Contemplacion."

The Singaporean account regarding Flor

I decided to go to the Singapore Infopedia website regarding the case of Flor. The site has some sources to defend the whole article. From what was gathered by Singapore Infopedia, a government website, I could think of the following things revealed regarding the case:

  • The Huang couple saw their son and their other maid, Delia Maga, laying dead in the flat in Gangsa Road. Delia did write a diary that made somebody I knew say that Delia was the true heroine. This happened on May 4, 1991. 
  • Flor claimed that she "fell ill" before the crimes actually happened.
  • Flor's trial took place on January 26, 1993, where she claimed she was tortured.
  • Hours before Flor's execution, another maid named Virginia Custodio Parumog did try to save her life with a claim proven false. 
What would be more interesting was that Virginia and another Filipino maid, Emilia Frenilla (who returned home to the Philippines), claimed that they overheard a conversation that could prove Flor innocent. However, it was later proven that Emilia may have overheard the brothers (the father and uncle of the deceased child) which may prove that Delia's death was at the hands of the employer. However, the brothers were usually conversing in a Chinese dialect--a language that Emilia couldn't understand given her status. If she knew Chinese, that would've been more believable. Instead, it was too easily dismissable since she never understood the language.

This was pretty much ignored. A lot of condemnation came in regarding Flor's execution. The stance against the death penalty can be controversial. Some people still prefer life imprisonment over the death sentence. There are indeed records of wrongfully executed people. However, whether one is pro-death penalty or anti-death penalty, the trial would later show that Flor indeed was involved in the crime. 

The Ramos administration did threaten to cut ties with Singapore. It was a long process which can be described as follows by Singapore Infopedia:
Contemplacion’s execution sparked intense public outrage in the Philippines against the Singapore government. Demonstrations were staged outside the Singapore embassy and Singapore flags were burned.29 The embassy reported receiving threats against Singaporeans and Singapore properties in the country30 and there were calls to boycott Singapore products there.31 The Philippine public, who considered Contemplacion a heroine, also directed their anger against their own government, which was criticised for not doing enough to protect the country’s millions of overseas contract workers.32 Fearing for their safety, several Singaporeans working in the Philippines left the country and many who were there on holiday or business cut short their visit.33

All this occurred in the run-up to the Philippine national elections on 8 May 1995, putting severe pressure on the Ramos administration and leading the Philippine government to certain actions that in turn soured diplomatic relations with Singapore.34 A few days after the execution, the Philippines recalled its Singapore ambassador and downgraded its diplomatic representation here to charge d’affaires.35 Singapore responded by recalling its Philippine ambassador as well.36 The April visit of then prime minister Goh Chok Tong to Manila, and joint naval exercises planned for July were also postponed.37

Ramos even threatened to sever diplomatic ties with Singapore if the special commission he had created on 20 March 1995 found Contemplacion to be a victim of injustice.38 The commission’s report, submitted on 6 April, added fuel to the fire with its conclusion that Contemplacion might have been innocent and that the case should be re-opened.39 The Singapore government rejected the findings but agreed to re-examine Maga’s remains.40

Two autopsies later, a joint one in April by experts from both sides and a second one in July by an independent panel,41 the Philippine government finally accepted the original findings of Singapore’s pathologists, and thus began the process of reconciliation between the two countries.42

The big difference between Singapore and the Philippines with its peace and order puts more doubt on the Philippine side. Thankfully, Ramos (and if I'm not wrong, also Duterte) had a change of mind regarding the issue. This would be an incredible contrast. A mockery of a trial known as the Vizconde Massacre was ongoing. We have Jessica Alfaro, the so-called star witness. We also would later have Hubert who was denied his constitutional right. Hubert had gathered evidence for his innocence only to be declared guilty by a retired judge, Amelita G. Tolentino. The public was both busy condemning Hubert for a crime he couldn't have committed while defending a woman who did a crime as innocent.

The findings were finally accepted. Singapore's better justice system and better peace and order build its credibility. Meanwhile, the Philippines' unsolved cases (such as the Vizconde Massacre and the Chiong Sisters case) make you wonder why the real murderers have never been found. I felt sorry for Hubert whom the late Lauro Vizconde still thought of as the main culprit. Hubert's actions when he requested a DNA test can show his possible innocence. Hubert knew he never did the crime. Meanwhile, the presentation of Flor as some kind of martyr (or even a saint) was going on at the same time. 

The "beatification" and even "canonization" of Flor 

The labor group known as Migrante International soon turned Flor into some kind of saint. In 1995, months after the execution, there was the creation of the Tagalog film, The Flor Contemplacion Story, by Director Joel Lamangan. Another film about Delia Maga called Victim No. 1: Delia Maga, Jesus Pray for Us, A Massacre in Singapore was released in May 1995, months before the release of the previously mentioned film. It was soon time to declare Flor as some kind of heroine. Protests such as burning the Singapore flag (which I heard Duterte also admitted to doing it before) were done. There were some groups that all renounced Singapore as a state without mercy. Even today, there are still groups that continue to insist on the innocence of Flor.

I only saw The Flor Contemplacion Story but not on a big screen. If I'm not wrong, was rather restricted due to the violence it may have. Two of Flor's twin sons, Joel and Jon-Jon, both starred as themselves in the movie. Nora Aunor even sang the song "Kahit Konting Awa" which translates into "Just a Little Pity". The whole film tried to portray Flor as an innocent woman who was wrongfully executed in Singapore. Amazingly, it was still shown even after the autopsy results had proven that the claims of the two maids were wrong. The courts already blew off the testimonies after some reexamination. However, the version of the film kept the testimony of the two maids and The Flor Contemplacion Story was released anyway. I'm amazed the movie was even given an HD redefinition for Pinoy Box Office. Nora herself even joins the rallies of Migrante International in remembering the executed maid.

The are loads of brainless comments whenever there's a video about Flor on YouTube. Are these angry emotional Filipino citizens aware of the broken justice system in their own country? As a Filipino, I feel ashamed just thinking of the contrast. Hubert still gets a lot of people believing he took part in the massacre. I wouldn't be surprised if the same people who believe Hubert was guilty have a good number of those who insist on Flor's innocence. The Singaporean justice system has had its credibility for a long time. Sure, I feel Singapore gets too strict at times and I think that needs to change. Meanwhile, I still like the Singaporean court system with how safe Singapore can be.

Knowing the legal system of Singapore would prove Flor's canonization to be rather stupid. The Philippine legal system is really questionable at best. If you know the whole story of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga, you'd understand how the Supreme Court (at that time) even messed it up further by not reviewing the case. Innocents were on death row while the real culprits may have left the country. Meanwhile, Singapore has a more thorough justice system followed by much lower corruption than the Philippines. That's why I want to say that those who defend Flor's innocence in spite of empirical data will probably recommend I watch that problematic movie as a source. A film can be full of artistic licenses which can even further muddle everything. 

I guess the best way that those who defend Flor's innocence would be summarized as, "Trust me, bro!" or "Just trust me." Is that even really a valid source to begin with?

Popular posts from this blog

Was Cesar Virata's Position as "Prime Minister" the Best Proof That a Parliamentary System Won't Work in the Philippines?

-
Image
Kahimyang Project It's often said by some of the now-old folks that the Philippines was once under a parliamentary system. I had some insults from a close-minded political scientist, some former dancer of an OFW, and others whenever I said, "We must shift to the parliamentary system!" They would say, "Look stupid! We already had a parliamentary system back in the Marcos Years!" I ask for the proof and they keep using Cesar Virata. By using insults, they start to make me doubt their credibility. It's because insults and other forms of Ad Hominem attacks are often the favorite tools of sore losers .  I would like to give this an example. One of their best sources is Cesar Virata. At first, it sounds like, "Okay, we had a parliamentary system." However, we must take note that not every country that has a prime minister, is under a parliamentary system. Some of them are still presidential in nature with parliamentary features . I wonder if Mrs. Raissa
Read more

Shifting to the Parliamentary System is Better than Banning Political Dynasties

-
Image
Some Filipinos who are totally against charter change (or constitutional reform) always use political dynasties as an excuse. It's not enough that some of them should keep saying that economic charter change will mean "selling the Philippines to foreigners". Please, if they realize it, developed countries allow 100% FDI ownership--allowing foreigners to own 100% of their business . Back on the topic, I would like to discuss political dynasties and why they're not necessarily bad . Some people keep talking about the anti-political dynasty law--that is one per family. It might be because they still think the first Marcos Administration was a parliamentary system. Please, evidence has been gathered that it was never a parliamentary system, to begin with (read here )!  It's easy to talk about political dynasties. Some people were citing President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. as a member of a political dynasty. Some people also cite the Dutertes. I even
Read more

REAL TALK: The Liberal Party of the Philippines Can ONLY Become The Genuine Opposition Under A Genuine Parliamentary Constitution

-
Image
PhilStar It's difficult to talk with people who are still comfortable with what they already know, right? However, the term Dilawan need not be drowned in negativity, but it can be drowned in negativity if the brand gets marred in a popularity-based political system. The Philippines currently uses the presidential system. If we were in a parliamentary system right now--chances are Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. wouldn't be prime minister due to the difficulty involved as explained in  " How to Become Singapore's Prime Minister, Explained in 7 Steps ". That means all candidates would need to do the following: Study and specialize Wait for the call Tea sessions and panels Take a test Perform well as an MP Win the trust of your peers Prepare for office The Dilawans can call themselves the genuine opposition, march in their proud yellow t-shirts, and more. However, under a presidential system, there's no real opposition, and the platform of any party
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

-
Image
People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir
Read more

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

-
Image
Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T
Read more

The Vizconde Massacre and Trial by "Trust Me Bro"?

-
Image
As Christmas approaches, another case worth revisiting for history vs. gossip is the Vizconde Massacre. I watched Crime Investigation Asia uploaded on YouTube. I wrote about the documentary Give Up Tomorrow -- a documentary that explores the irregularities while pursuing justice for the late Chiong sisters, Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong and Marijoy Jimenea Chiong. I feel compelled to write about the Vizconde Massacre. For more than 10 years, I used to believe that Hubert Jeffry Pagaspas Webb, son of Freddie Webb, was guilty. It turns out that according to Crime Investigation Asia --it was really a trial by gossip . In my case, I want to call it a trial of Trust Me Bro.  I still read comments about how footage of Hubert in the States could've been "easily tampered". Yet, those who comment haven't presented the evidence. I guess if I asked for their evidence, they'll just say, "Trust me bro!" Granted, photo editing was still in its infancy back then so how cou
Read more

Was the Late John Regala Interviewed by the Directors of "Give Up Tomorrow"?

-
Image
The passing away of John Regala hit today. I remembered a film called Animal (2004) in  which the original title was originally Butakal meaning male pig. Regala starred as Jaco Lozano--an obvious caricature of Juan Francisco Gonzales Larrañaga aka Paco. Strangely enough, neither the Larrañagas nor the Osmeñas were heard to have ever filed a case against the late director Toto Natividad. Instead, it was the Chiong family that filed a lawsuit against Natividad. I did write about  whether or not Natividad himself was interviewed by the directors of Give Up Tomorrow . As mentioned, there was over 400 hours worth of footage and over 100 interviews done . Both Marty Syjuco and Michael Collins may have interviewed not only Natividad, the late Tony Calvento but also Regala himself since he played the film's main antagonist . In 2018, we had an incident when Niño Muhlach apologized to Paco for the portrayal in The Calvento Files . Apparently, Niño himself wasn't interviewed but was prob
Read more

Trust Me Bro: The 1987 Constitution is the Best in the World!

-
I may be no lawyer or constitutionalist but it's time to use common sense . I'm afraid common sense is hardly taught or even encouraged in schools. Right now, I want to do this provocative entry to ask, "Fact or gossip: Is the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines the best in the world?" Yes, you read that right. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that last 2018 and I'm still laughing at it. I've decided to write this common-sense post to actually contest the idea that, "The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the best in the world."  I'm laughing at some things Davide Jr. had said such as, "It' is the only institution in the world where the public office is a public trust." However, this man is terribly wrong because, around the world, we see the doctrine where public office is a public trust. Thomas Jefferson also said that public office is public trust -- way before Davide Jr. was born into the world! I really laughed at their claim o
Read more

Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan and Discovering More About One's Common Austronesian Roots

-
Image
I was doing some research on Taiwan finding out that the natives are indeed Austronesians . It seems that Indonesians and Malaysians may have also settled in Taiwan aside from the Philippines. A look at Mt. Alishan and Banaue Rice Terraces have a similarity. Taiwan has its famous tea terraces. Banaue has its famous rice terraces. Both are cultural heritages that must be preserved! I soon found an article which Ifugao OFWs in Taiwan. Not surprisingly, these Ifugao OFWs can point out several things that are pretty similar. An article called " A Gotad Picnic With Ifugaos Living in Taiwan " would tell of Armand Camhol, an Ifugao OFW, who met with other Ifugaos in Taiwan. Gotad is a thanksgiving festival for the Ifugaos. The News Lens International Edition What was noted by Armand at the end of the article is: The people of Ifugao value hospitality, and as a symbol of friendship, they shared their holiday with their invited guests, who, in return, sang, joined the dances, and made
Read more

Can Anti-Reformists Prove to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy That the Marcos Regime was a Real Parliamentary?

-
Image
The previous comparison of the CoRRECT Movement was between the late businessman John Gokongwei Jr. and Hilario Davide Jr., a public policy expert. The comparison is pretty much apples and oranges which is why Kishore Mahbubani, founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) would make more sense. It's not enough to say something. If the source is just merely Merkado CTTO (read here ) then I have every right to doubt it. I tried asking for empirical evidence  they have that the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was a parliamentary government. The only evidence they have was that there was a prime minister and his name was Cesar Virata. However, further details reveal that Virata was a non-starter and a no leader. From Third World to First , Virata was even considered a candidate to replace the late Ferdinand E. Marcos, a president with powers . A challenge that I want to pose to people who still insist that the Marcos Years were indeed under a parli
Read more