Skip to main content

The Late Lee Kuan Yew Called the Philippines' Press RAMBUNCTIOUS

The Straits Times

As April Fool's Day draws near, I intend to write on something the late Lee Kuan Yew said in his book From Third World to First. It was once wrongly said that he said the Philippine presses as masters of intrigue. It was made by a certain Jesus Satorre Jr. who wrongly called Lee Kuan Yew, president. That alone deserves to be fact-checked. It was even funny how a certain someone called Mahathir Mohamad a president when he criticized former president Rodrigo R. Duterte. 

However, there was a quote from the book concerning the Philippines about the Philippine press:

Ramos knew well the difficulties of trying to govern with strict American-style separation of powers. The senate had already defeated Mrs. Aquino's proposal to retain the American bases. The Philippines had a rambunctious press but it did not check corruption. Individual press reporters could be bought, as could many judges.

I'm afraid that it's very easy to quote what Lee said about the Marcoses. It's right there in the book. It's the same chapter where he met with the late Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino. It's also in the same chapter where he called Cesar Virata a non-starter and no leader for the Filipino people. That's why I refuse to buy even for a split second that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. established a parliamentary system.

The idea that the media should do the checks and balances is stupid. How can you have check and balance by media if the Philippine press is well, rambunctious? In short, it's a very boisterous press. I felt that while Lee wrote his book, he probably remembered a 1988 speech where he mentioned how the Philippine press failed the Filipino people.

An interesting event happened in 1987. It was where Mrs. Aquino sued the late Luis Beltran. It was also interesting that Mrs. Aquino ordered radio stations to broadcast anti-government propaganda. It was also mentioned that Beltran, while apparently using a figure of speech during the coup de etat, that Mrs. Aquino was in hiding. I wonder if Mrs. Aquino was right in suing Beltran. In my own opinion, Beltran would partly fit what Lee Kuan Yew said about the Philippine presses. I wonder if somebody paid Beltran to ruin Mrs. Aquino. It seemed that the event showed just what Lee Kuan Yew thought about the Philippine presses.

Later, the Philippine presses became the instrument against constitutional reform 

As I was continuing to read Lee Kuan Yew's book, it would be interesting that he wrote also about Ramos' regime. As I like to mention, Mrs. Aquino should've remained a symbolic head of state as many events during the Beltran incident proved she was fitter as the people's representative. Now, it was Ramos' turn and he was the president. Ramos was bent on charter change and much gossip came in. The idea was that the six-year, no more and no less, single term of a president was to prevent another Marcos-type regime. 

About Ramos, Lee Kuan Yew also said the following:
Mrs. Aquino's succesor, Fidel Ramos, whom she had backed, was more practical and established greater stability. In November 1992, I visited him. In a speech to the 18th Philippine Business Confdence, I said, "I do not believe democracy necessarily leads to development. I believe what a country needs to develop is discipline more than democracy." In private, President Ramos said he agreed with me that British parliamentary-type constitutions worked better bcause the majority party in the legislative was also in the govenrment. Publicly, Ramos had to differ.

Ramos was often criticized for privatization. Is it me or does the Philippines have a very anti-business mindset in the long run? The presses regained their freedom and now were misusing their freedom. Freedom of the press is indeed a good thing. It was a good thing freedom of the press was restored by EDSA 1986. However, without any restraint, press freedom can become a toxic thing to any country.

I remember in the late 1990s when I feared two things. First, it was that Ramos may declare martial law. Second, it was Ramos getting another term. It was often taught that Marcos Sr. ruled for 20 years and he was a dictator. What was never mentioned was that some good rulers ruled beyond 20 years. Think of how long Lee Kuan Yew ruled Singapore to stabilize a country once ridden with crime and corruption. I feared charter change and I was also among those who opposed it.

I think one campaign ad said, "If the Philippines would shift to parliamentary, just think how frightening it would be that the president would sit for more than six years." This was what I feared. I remember panicking in fear from when I was 11 years old to 12 years old. However, the more I thought about parliamentary systems, the more I realized that it was all about having another term than term extension. Term extension means lengthening a term. A prime minister can have many terms if he or she is doing well. If not, a prime minister can expect not to finish his or her term.

If there's anything I'd like to address, the rambunctious press of the Philippines fooled the masses. It's been a failure. I believe it's a result of Article XVII's restriction that only Filipinos can own mass media. It shouldn't be a problem if a mass media entity in the Philippines has foreign funding or ownership. Yet, I think having that provision may explain why we have what Lee Kuan Yew calls, a rambunctious press. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...
Read more

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...
Read more

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...
Read more

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...
Read more