Skip to main content

Filipinos Calling Indians as "Bumbay"

The song "Dayang Dayang" was given a parody cover called "Dayang Daya". Oftentimes, the song "Dayang Dayang" is thought to be Indian. Instead, it's arguably said to be from Muslim Mindanao or was brought in either from Malaysia or Indonesia. Historically, some of the settlers in the Philippines were Malaysians and Indonesians. So, it's probably safe to say that most Filipinos of brown skin descent are mixed Malay and Indonesian. I was even reminded how I mistook a Malaysian woman for a Filipino woman. Back on topic, the parody song has an introduction that says, "Kami Bumbay galing sa India..." (We're Bombay coming from India). I even tend to refer to Indians as Bombay--something I ended up tactlessly saying during my first trip to Singapore.

Many times, Filipinos tend to use Bumbay not as a racial slur but to simply refer to an Indian. Some Filipino-Indians don't even mind being called Bumbay for a reason. I guess they got accustomed to it. A deeper reason might be because of the place of origin of the migrants. ABS-CBN News also offers this insight on why Indians tend to be called "Bumbay":

Professor Joefe Santarita, dean of the University of the Philippines Asian Center and an expert on Indian Studies, said scholars believe the term "Bumbay" came from Bombay (or Mumbai), the place of departure of most Punjabis and Sikhs who have migrated to the Philippines.

He also said Filipinos may have adopted the term from Sikhs themselves who address their fellows as "bhum bhai" or brothers of the earth.

"I personally believe that the early Sikhs did not totally use 'Bombay' based on place of departure but of its etymological link to the term which commands respect from a fellow Sikh who hails from the same place in India. Bhum bhai (brothers of the earth) as the Sikhs’ way of addressing his fellow from the same place)," Santarita told ABS-CBN News.

Despite the positive etymology, some Filipinos use the term "Bumbay" in a derogatory or sarcastic manner. 

I remember discussing Asian history in Filipino dialects uses the term "Bombay" instead of "Indian". 

During Fridays, when Asian history was to be discussed in Tagalog (which is as appropriate as Chinese language classes demanding you speak in Chinese) on Fridays, I could remember how the teacher said to still use the term Indian even when class was to be held in Tagalog. Yet, it's very hard to do so, especially when discussing at home. It's almost as inescapable as using the term Intsik for anyone of Chinese descent. 

When discussing the origins of Buddhism during Asian history class (which some think came from China instead of India), it was easy to say something like, "Buddha wasn't Chinese, he's a Bumbay." in either Tagalog or Cebuano. Some might say in Cebuano saying, "It's too clear that Buddha was a Bumbay." Yet, Siddharta Gautama wasn't from the Bombay Province. Instead, Gautama's kingdom was from Kapilavastu. I could remember saying something like, "Well, Mother Guan Yin is obviously a Bombay. Just look at the way she dresses and notice the red dot on her head."

I remember how often I was threatened with "If you don't sleep, the Bumbay will get you." Ironic that some Filipino-Chinese elders who used such a scare tactic also practiced Buddhism. Buddhism is a religion from India, not China. The image of the Goddess of Mercy is dressed up like an Indian woman. 

Using the word "Bumbay" positively in daily language

It took me some time to warm up to Indian food. For one, as a beef eater, I totally must respect the beef taboo with Indians, especially with Hinduism. I remembered how I ate at a Filipino-Indian's house (and they spoke Filipino fluently) and one of the house members knew how to speak limited Hokkien. My Filipino-Indian friends didn't mind being called Bumbay even if they didn't descend from the same province. I think one of them was of a Hyderabadi. Hyderabad is pretty much like the Legaspi, Albay, of India. South Indian food and Bicolano food are pretty similar. Filipino friends of mine who enjoy Indian food tend to choose the South Indian variation due to the use of coconuts.

Oftentimes, I could easily end up saying, "My favorite Bumbay food is from Bollywood." Some Filipino friends say, "My favorite Bumbay food is from Cherry's the Spice." However, I prefer to use the word Indian since Bumbay (or Bombay) might mean more of an ethnic group from India than the Indian population. It's like the Philippines has several groups such as Tagalog, Cebuano, Boholano, Ilocano, Ilonggo, Bicolano, Pampagueno, Tausug, and Chavacano.  

The word Indian will still be more appropriate than the word Bumbay. I think some Indian restaurant owners of Cebu aren't descended from Mumbai. If I'm not wrong, Cherry's the Spice's owner is of Hyderabadi descent based on the food served. I think the owner of Bharat Spice isn't from Mumbai either. Calling the owner a Bumbay is like calling a Bicolano a Tagalog. I'm using Bicol here because the food of Bicol and South India are somewhat similar. 

Pretty much, I decided to write about why Indians tend to be called Bumbay. It's not a slur word. It's got a positive etymology. Yet, I can't help but think January can be a very vindicating month. It's when Five-Six lenders start to roam around asking to be paid back what was owed to them. Meanwhile, let's give a toast to Indians with an honest living providing jobs and services for Filipinos. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...
Read more

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...
Read more

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...
Read more

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...
Read more

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...
Read more