Reviewing History and Policy with MBA Discipline. Investigating the Business Behind the Facts.
Search This Blog
Are Political Dynasties, Not Presidential's Name Recall System, the Real Problem?
As a person fighting for constitutional reform, I looked at this video by Orion Perez Dumdum. Some people are still relying on the allegations made by a certain fat lady on Facebook. I even got blocked by a certain fat man with glasses. I feel victorious after that fat guy blocked me. I watched this video and thought, "Are political dynasties the problem?" People fuzz over political dynasties. Some people even go as far as to blame political dynasties, not the ridiculous 60-40 equity restriction, as to why FDIs have chosen Vietnam. Yes, Communist Vietnam which is a one-party state.
The "next best solution" is what? Ban political dynasties altogether. Whether we like to admit it or not, every family has bad eggs and good eggs. A good king can sire bad sons. A bad king can sire good sons. It's all about upbringing that determines the direction of one's offspring. This would also play a double stnadard. Why did people clamor the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" A. Aquino Jr. (who died in 2021) to run for president? Maria Corazon Cojuangco-Aquino died in 2009 and the clamor for Noynoy to run for president was there in 2010. It could be hypocritical when people praise the Aquinos then condemn the Marcoses and Dutertes... because dynasty? Why not focus on the lack of merit rather than because... dynasty?
The problem isn't dynasties but dynasties born out of name recall
The presidential system, whether we want to admit it or not, is usually a result of name recall. I would go back to Noynoy again. Noynoy for all his pros and cons, is from a political dynasty. Why were people clamoring for Noynoy to run because of his mother's death? Isn't it really a name recall then? Some people may even be wishing Maria Kristine Bernadette "Kris" C. Aquino would recover so she could run. Is it because of her brother's death last 2021?
Vera Files
The Aquinos were all part of a political family. Servilliano Aquino was one of Emilio Aguinaldo's men. Benigno Simeon Aquino Sr. was a politician. Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" Aquino Jr. was a senator. The last in the lineage, who died a bachelor, was also a politician. Whether we want to admit it or not, certain traits do pass down. Maybe, Noynoy never got his father's or great-grandfather's military gene. Ninoy actually played a part in the surrender of the rebel Luis Taruc. Yes, the Aquinos are a political dynasty. That's what makes Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño's statement on Paolo Benigno "Bam" A. Aquino questionable. It's because Bam is still a great-grandson of Servilliano Aquino and a grandson of Benigno Sr.!
Basically, it wouldn't be wrong to vote for an Aquino, a Marcos, a Duterte, etc. by default. What becomes wrong is that the presidential system is all about name recall. In Tagalog, we call that pasikatan sa pangalan. Pasikatan is all about popularity. For example, some people may have voted for Bam because he was a first cousin of Noynoy instead of being an outstanding entrepreneur. With Noynoy's death, I hope that his nephews Joshua Aquino or James Aquino Yap Jr. will not be urged to run, simply because of their relation to him!
The political dynasties born out of name recall are bad. It's because it could care less if the member was a good egg or a rotten egg. It becomes effortless to run because all it needs is a degree of sympathy. It can take form of a politician's widow or orphaned children. The trend followed with the Aquinos. Mrs. Aquino was urged to run as president because her hsuband Ninoy died. That wouldn't be a problem if Mrs. Aquino was to remain as a symbolic Head of State. Mrs. Aquino should've been the symbolic head while the late Fidel V. Ramos could've been the prime minister. Mrs. Aquino would represent the Filipino people, accept credentials, open the doors, and Ramos makes the important decisions for the country!
Let's talk about Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo's three daughters. Their names are Jessica Marie "Aika' Robredo (management engineering), Janine Patricia "Tricia" Gerona Robredo (a doctor in medicine), and Jillian Therese "Jill" Gerona Robredo (double degree in economics and mathematics). Should the Robredos be exempt from the political dynasty ban? If that ban happens, let's say that all three daughters prove capable of running for office. Looking at their degrees, I don't think it's far fetched if ever Mrs. Robredo's three daughters will ever run for office while their mother lives!
Passing the anti-political dynasty would throw away the baby with the bathwater. It would mean throwing away the fresh fruit with the rotten fruit. The problem of dynasties that carry their rotten egg is because of name recall. Let's just say that one day, the anti-political dynasty law will be passed. Let's say that Aika, Tricia, and Jill would be more qualified than people who don't belong to political dynasties. According to the political dynasty law, because their father Jesse Robredo (who died last 2012) was a mayor of Naga City in Bicol, their mother had been a legislator and vice president, the three shall therefore, "Thou must not run because thou belongest to a political dynasty!" will hit them. What's next? Apply a double standard and "exempt" them? Pass laws to ban the Marcoses and Dutertes or only specific families from having a political dynasty? That's a whole lot of a mess!
However, political dynasties should never matter if they were in the parliamentary system
There are times when a political dynasty has a good father that raises good children. That's why I used Mrs. Robredo's daughters to be an example. Would it be so wrong if these children all enter politics via meritocracy? It's because if Mrs. Robredo's three daughters all prove themselves as good workers, why can't all three become good public servants? Some Filipinos say (and most of them are boomers by the way, who keep quoting the same old broken records such as Raissa Robles, CBCP, Atty. Hilario Davide Jr., etc.) that parliamentary system will immediately worsen the political dynasties. Some say get rid of political dynasties first. That's why I raise Mrs. Robredo's three daughters that what if, one day, these three are all qualified to be part of the government. It's because such people are already treating Mrs. Robredo like she's some miracle worker, when she isn't!
The Straits Times
Now we need to look into Singapore. I'm afraid some people are too overly sentimental over poor Flor Contemplacion. Please, it's already going 30 years since Flor died! Plus, Flor herself was really guilty! However, some people may just tell me to go watch The Flor Contemplacion Story instead of get real evidence of her innocence! The same people may still be believing that Hubert Jeffry Webb wasn't framed, even if proof says he was truly in the US, when the Vizconde Massacre happened! Back on topic, I bought Third World to First because I wanted to get the writings firsthand, from the hand of the great statesman. Why should I listen to people who gossip about this and that, when I can get what LKY had written down based on experience? It's from reading that book that I discovered people who say Singapore only opened to FDI, after it became a first world country, are lying.
Going down, LKY recalled in chapter 42 of From Third World to First. LKY also pointed out that while he did appoint LSH as junior minister, the latter still had to take orders from the senior minister. In short, LSH was given a job and received no special treatment. Not to mention, LSH was already studying hard. It's a stark contrast to President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s growing up years in that fake parliamentary system. The big difference was there. LSH was already an outstanding student. LSH would already have the credentials to make him a junior minister. LSH wasn't giving orders to the senior minister. LSH was taking orders from his father's minister! I wonder if Raissa Espinosa-Robles even bothered to read that contrast?
LSH was a Member of the Parliament while LKY was alive. If the Singaporeans operated with an anti-political dynasty ban, all competent people belonging to political dynasties would be banned. They would be banned because they're part of a dynasty. It would be stupid to let someone incompetent sit because "he or she is not part of a political dynasty" and let the competent person out because "he or she is part of a political dynasty". The dynasty would be broken if LSH proves incompetent. However, LSH had to prove himself. Family members or not, the parliamentary system cares more about how one performs and not if one came from a political dynasty.
In a parliamentary system, it would be all about meritocracy. That means nobody will become prime minister solely because of necropolitics. A grieving widow who proves herself capable of being prime minister (because of her outstanding performance as a member of parliament), can become prime minister. It wouldn't be voting for a grieving widow out of sympathy. If a grieving widow has three daughters who have studied hard to become members of parliament, why not let all three of them sit? It would only be wrong if the widow won out of sympathy and her daughters all won because of the popular name recall, even if the widow and her daughters are incompetent.
The political dynasty would actually be lessed. It's because nobody in the family will be voted solely because of pasikatan. That means every Aquino, every Marcos, every Robredo, every Cayetano, every Ejercito, etc. wouldn't be the focus. Party-centric politics means that even if older brother and older sister are in it, they're not the focus. Instead, the party's platform is the agenda. If a family can prove beneficial to the party, the family stays. If not, the family has remove its bad eggs to save the party's reputation.
IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21? Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely. Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living? We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...
I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...
Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...
I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas (I Love the Philippines) Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵ðŸ‡ðŸŽ— Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...
ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...