Skip to main content

Leftist Double Standards Unveiled by a YouTuber?

It's crazy when a regular civilian talks more sense than the American mass media. The video I watched brought me to the Jordan Neely incident. This was also the video that had me thinking about leftists who think "CEOs are evil and they have the easiest job in the world!" People who say no billionaire has worked as hard as the water, don't realize that the more money one has, the heavier the responsibility. 

While listening to this commentary, I was curious and Googled "Jordan Neely". It turned out that the homeless man was a criminal. Times Now reveals this staggering detail:

Neely had 43 prior arrests between 2013 and 2021, according to the authorities. Four alleged assaults, transportation fraud, and trespassing were among the charges. Additionally, he has an ongoing warrant for an assault in 2021. Low-level violations like public drinking were the subject of several arrests. The NYPD came under fire for making Neely's medical and criminal records public. The New York Civil Liberties Union's Beth Haroules denounced the revelation. She said it appeared to "vilify him while protecting the identity of his killer," as quoted Newsweek.

Besides, Daniel Penny was trying to protect passengers from Jordan. Come on! Isn't it obvious? Does a white man have to be automatically evil according to some black men? What happened to the cause of fighting for equal rights for Americans of different racial backgrounds? It would be easy to bash Misha here because she's well, a white girl. However, what if it was an African American who subdued Neely? What would racist African Americans have to say? Some African Americans are no better than the white supremacists they hate.

The recent assassination of Brian Thompson also raises another issue. What shocks me (or shouldn't) is that the suspected killer Luigi Mangione was a valedictorian. It's not to demonize all valedictorians. However, this might show that not all honor students are going to turn out right. Some honor students are still turning out right. Others are turning out wrong. Let's not throw a hasty generalization. However, celebrate Luigi as a hero? I don't know what really happened. 

It was most likely an act of vengeance. However, does that make the crime justifiable? The answer is still no. Murder is murder. I don't know what grievance Luigi held against Thompson. 

he tragedy of Thompson’s death aside, the early-morning killing sparked a conversation on social media about the negative experiences patients and families have had with health insurance companies — a swirl of chatter that Fox says could say a lot about a potential motive. 

“In a case like this, without the knowledge of what was written on the bullets, one may say that he could have been an employee of the company who was terminated. But the phrase on the ammunition suggests something different,” Fox says. “It might be that someone, the gunman or someone close to him, was insured by this company and was denied the kind of coverage that they hoped for, and probably suffered tremendously.”

“If that’s the case,” Fox continues, “one way to approach it would be to examine denials and see if there were any instances where, following the denial, there was a record of any loud or threatening conversation between individuals.”

Were the leftists celebrating because a CEO died or was it because a a corrupt CEO died? I can't be certain. However, there's always this problem of people who hate the rich simply because they're rich. They even say that it's impossible to go from rags to riches without engaging in something dubious. However, their best source is just "Trust Me Bro" instead of citing a valid source. Who can say that leftists really care about the poor and the working class? In fact, some policies they advocate for will eventually hurt the poor and the working class with inflation. They can't alter the facts of economics either. 

As I listened to it, I'm simply cringing at America's intellectual decline! 

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...