Skip to main content

Leftist Double Standards Unveiled by a YouTuber?

It's crazy when a regular civilian talks more sense than the American mass media. The video I watched brought me to the Jordan Neely incident. This was also the video that had me thinking about leftists who think "CEOs are evil and they have the easiest job in the world!" People who say no billionaire has worked as hard as the water, don't realize that the more money one has, the heavier the responsibility. 

While listening to this commentary, I was curious and Googled "Jordan Neely". It turned out that the homeless man was a criminal. Times Now reveals this staggering detail:

Neely had 43 prior arrests between 2013 and 2021, according to the authorities. Four alleged assaults, transportation fraud, and trespassing were among the charges. Additionally, he has an ongoing warrant for an assault in 2021. Low-level violations like public drinking were the subject of several arrests. The NYPD came under fire for making Neely's medical and criminal records public. The New York Civil Liberties Union's Beth Haroules denounced the revelation. She said it appeared to "vilify him while protecting the identity of his killer," as quoted Newsweek.

Besides, Daniel Penny was trying to protect passengers from Jordan. Come on! Isn't it obvious? Does a white man have to be automatically evil according to some black men? What happened to the cause of fighting for equal rights for Americans of different racial backgrounds? It would be easy to bash Misha here because she's well, a white girl. However, what if it was an African American who subdued Neely? What would racist African Americans have to say? Some African Americans are no better than the white supremacists they hate.

The recent assassination of Brian Thompson also raises another issue. What shocks me (or shouldn't) is that the suspected killer Luigi Mangione was a valedictorian. It's not to demonize all valedictorians. However, this might show that not all honor students are going to turn out right. Some honor students are still turning out right. Others are turning out wrong. Let's not throw a hasty generalization. However, celebrate Luigi as a hero? I don't know what really happened. 

It was most likely an act of vengeance. However, does that make the crime justifiable? The answer is still no. Murder is murder. I don't know what grievance Luigi held against Thompson. 

he tragedy of Thompson’s death aside, the early-morning killing sparked a conversation on social media about the negative experiences patients and families have had with health insurance companies — a swirl of chatter that Fox says could say a lot about a potential motive. 

“In a case like this, without the knowledge of what was written on the bullets, one may say that he could have been an employee of the company who was terminated. But the phrase on the ammunition suggests something different,” Fox says. “It might be that someone, the gunman or someone close to him, was insured by this company and was denied the kind of coverage that they hoped for, and probably suffered tremendously.”

“If that’s the case,” Fox continues, “one way to approach it would be to examine denials and see if there were any instances where, following the denial, there was a record of any loud or threatening conversation between individuals.”

Were the leftists celebrating because a CEO died or was it because a a corrupt CEO died? I can't be certain. However, there's always this problem of people who hate the rich simply because they're rich. They even say that it's impossible to go from rags to riches without engaging in something dubious. However, their best source is just "Trust Me Bro" instead of citing a valid source. Who can say that leftists really care about the poor and the working class? In fact, some policies they advocate for will eventually hurt the poor and the working class with inflation. They can't alter the facts of economics either. 

As I listened to it, I'm simply cringing at America's intellectual decline! 

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Just a Coincidence that Most Least Corrupt Countries, are Under the PARLIAMENTARY System?

It's easy to post an outrage on Facebook, whether it's on the Butthurt Philippines' Facebook page or Gerry Cacanindin's relatively open Facebook profile (except that only his friends can comment). I try to ignore the guy's page. I was wondering if Gerry has learned his lesson (that the Philippines badly needs a system upgrade) or if he still wants to believe that "It's just a matter if Leni Robredo or Vico Sotto." The latest Facebook post gives me something to think about: People often ask why some countries seem almost immune to corruption. As if their leaders are just magically more honest. But that’s not really it. The truth is actually simpler. These countries didn’t wait for good people. They built systems where doing something dirty is hard, risky, and usually not worth it. In the least corrupt countries, corruption isn’t just illegal but inconvenient. Paper trails are everywhere. Payments are digital. Contracts are public. Anyone can look up wh...

What? The Aquinos Aren't Part of a Political Dynasty?!

  I was looking at the Mahal Ko Ang Pilipinas  (I Love the Philippines)  Facebook page, which made me laugh. This is what they wrote on their post saying that the Aquino Family isn't a political dynasty: THE AQUINO FAMILY IS NOT A POLITICAL DYNASTY 🇵🇭🎗 Pro-Duterte blogger Tio Moreno says that Bam Aquino is part of a political dynasty because the Aquino family is a political dynasty. But to me, this is not true. Why is it not true that the Aquino family is a political dynasty? 🤔 1. When Ninoy Aquino entered politics, none of his children joined him in his endeavors, and even his wife Cory did not join him in politics. 2. When Ninoy was assassinated in 1983, none of his children succeeded him in politics, not even his wife. But when the opposition and his supporters were looking to be the opposition's candidate for the presidency in the snap election called by Ferdie Marcos for 1986, his housewife Cory Cojuangco-Aquino was approached, encouraged or convinced by people t...

Lee Kuan Yew and Mahathir Mohamad: Just a Matter of Strong Leadership Without a Good System?

Jakarta Globe It's very easy to talk about how we need character change only, not a charter change. I say that having a charter change (better termed constitutional reform ) will lead to character change. The old saying of some boomers goes, "It's common sense that nothing is wrong with the system, just the people running the system." However, when I ask something like, "If that's so then why do other nations have better leaders? What about Mahathir Mohamad and Lee Kuan Yew?" Their answer is, "Well, that's proof that the system isn't defective, it's just the leader." This can also come from people who believe what Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. said that there's nothing wrong with the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, that it's the "best in the world". The arguments are clearly illogical at best . Some say that the parliamentary system worked in Malaysia and Singapore because those heading it aren't corrupt. T...

Why Philippine Elections Can Be Compared to GAMBLING

Gemini AI Art Some time ago, I wrote an essay that Filipinos can expect to lose more money betting that people will vote wisely . It's time for the truth,  and the  inconvenient truth hurts now, doesn't it? I had Gemini AI create this new AI art of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo, at the casino, just to make a point. Sure, Bongbong shook hands with Leni in Sorsogon as a step for political reconcilation . However, such events should be considered more like random variables, such as getting your ball to land on a certain color and a specific number in a game of roulette.  Let's define what a gamble means. The Cambridge Dictionary defines gamble as: to do something that involves risks that might result in loss of money or failure, hoping to get money or achieve success: The gamble of whether your candidate wins or not, because popularity is fickle It's effortless to say, "It's not rea...

My Experience with a Cataract and Laser Eye Surgery

What really scared me was when my left eye got blurred. At first, I was hoping it was just a dry eye. I had my check-up done. My worst fears were confirmed by my cloudy vision. I had a cataract but at age 37? It was pretty young. It was a developmental cataract or a developmental defect . I was told that there was no other choice but to have surgery. I was pretty scared. I decided it was time to really view cataract surgery and discover the amazing use of laser cataract surgery. It's a good thing I dismissed the bogus claims of cataract-dissolving drops.  Above is a sample video of what was shown in the hospital. I was nervous at first about what could happen. Having been told by the doctor (and will not disclose further details out of respect for the doctor's privacy) that it'll take faster than the manual surgery was a relief. I was willing to spend more on laser surgery rather than have the bladed procedure. I could say I was scared of the bladed procedure. I heard that ...