Skip to main content

Ghosts or Money: the Witnesses of the Chiong Sisters' Case

As it's July and it's been raining hard, it's hard for me not to think of the Chiong Sisters case. It's because the two sisters disappeared during a rainy evening. Sure, it's already been more than 20 years. However, an injustice for one is an injustice for all. In this case, it's not just injustice for the #Chiong7, the families of the #Chiong7--but also for the Chiong family. There's really no real justice when the wrong people are convicted. 

As I watched Jacqueline Comes Home--I can't help but comment where God supposedly spoke to Thelma Jimenea-Chiong, where Mrs. Chiong went to a group of seances (which may have never happened and Mrs. Chiong stormed out of the theater, crying, during the rape scenes), and a scene where Marijoy's ghost was at the ravine at Tan-awan, Carcar. Now, it's time to look at another angle of the witnesses that came forward to incriminate Paco.

Were there ghosts or money? This would be an interesting question to ask, as I watched the video I just shared. Judge Teresita Gallanida, the one who questioned why Paco Larrañaga's photo was looking sideways, (some people call her overly advanced in her thinking), and it may have been tampered with. I wonder if Atty Naunsa Ba Ni (hopefully I wouldn't have to see her as a Regional Trial Court judge or even be in the Supreme Court of the Philippines, God forbid) even believes that the recurring dreams of the people in this video as "valid proof" that Paco is indeed guilty, and that the "infallible" Supreme Court of the Philippines made no mistake in denying the motion of reconsideration. 

Williard Redobles was a security guard in Ayala Center Cebu, at that time. Can the guard be certain it was Paco or did he see somebody else? Both the late Marijoy Jimenea Chiong and the late Jacqueline Jimenea Chiong (though some still label her as "missing" but her body may have met a fate similar to the Helle Crafts case) were last seen in Ayala at night. Can the guard really be sure it was the right person? Based on the interview here, Williard isn't even sure. Did the money make him change his mind or what? It seems to be that there was a combination of blackmail and money. If there was money, it may have come from the Office of the President during that time. Joseph Estrada was a close friend of the victims, and he probably wanted the case done and over with. Maybe, Estrada was the one who released money without thinking that people would end up lying for the money! Estrada had cases of plunder, which may also be linked with moving the Chiong Case. 

Back in the 1990s, the Centre of International Education (CIE) had an Internet cafe, known as Global Village. The Internet cafe may no longer be in Ayala Center Cebu as of recent. However, Jacqueline once worked there and she was with her supervisor, Sheila Singson. I read from some YouTube comments that Sheila is now living in Canada. Maybe, that's why I don't see her name or record from people I know who work at CIE or graduated there. Atty. Florencio Villarin, who's now in his late 80s, said that Sheila couldn't identify anyone, except the person in the cartographic sketch. However, when Sheila went to court, she immediately said she saw Paco! If they mentioned anything about ghosts--was that just for added effect or was the reward money for testifying that juicy? Imagine, committing perjury just for some money

The witnesses surfaced only two or three months after the case was put into court--according to Judge Teresita Galanida. As a lawyer, I believe that Judge Galanida should have had the witnesses cross-examined. Was she aware of the possible bribery or what? Remember that Mrs. Chiong promised promotions to whoever could help in her case. It's because Mrs. Chiong had the backing of the "omnipotent" force of Estrada's office at that time. Cheryl Jimenea was a grieving aunt who wanted justice for her nieces. Cheryl even shouted that Jacqueline was still missing after the late Judge Martin Ocampo gave his verdict. 

What amazes me though is that Jacqueline Comes Home didn't include these scenes. I already had unintentional laughs when Donnalyn Bartolome was acting as Marijoy's ghost. That was the scene where Marijoy's boyfriend threw flowers at the ravine. Why didn't Ysabelle "Peach" Caparras even bother to make a scene where Sheila and Williard had their dreams? Instead, Peach went for the Mrs. Chiong consulting seances to find Jacqueline's body. It's possible that the scenes were filmed, with real actresses, but they were deleted in the final cut. Maybe, Peach wanted to film the scene but couldn't find people to play as those who claimed to have been visited by ghosts. 

Right now, since I'm no lawyer, I refuse to directly challenge Atty. Naunsa Ba Ni or her husband Atty. Imbento Ug Istorya. However, it doesn't mean that I don't have the right to question them, if ever, they believe that the recurring dreams are enough proof to convict Paco. Did those who claim to see ghosts really see ghosts or were they given several lie detector tests? I can't be certain and if they weren't, something's really wrong! 

Popular posts from this blog

Nirvana Fallacy and the Die-Hard Defenders of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines

IMGUR The philosopher Voltaire (real name  François-Marie Aroue ) was said to have said, "Perfect is the enemy of good." To define the Nirvana fallacy, we can look at Logically Fallacious to help us define it: Description: Comparing a realistic solution with an idealized one , and discounting or even dismissing the realistic solution as a result of comparing to a “perfect world” or impossible standard, ignoring the fact that improvements are often good enough reason . Logical Form: X is what we have. Y is the perfect situation. Therefore, X is not good enough. Example #1: What’s the point of making drinking illegal under the age of 21?  Kids still manage to get alcohol. Explanation: The goal in setting a minimum age for drinking is to deter underage drinking, not abolish it completely.  Suggesting the law is fruitless based on its failure to abolish underage drinking completely, is fallacious. Example #2: What’s the point of living?  We’re all going to die anyway. Ex...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

A Parliamentary Philippines with Mandatory Weekly Questioning Will Be Better Than Its Mandatory Yearly Presidential SONAs

Rappler I must admit that ignorance of the difference between the parliamentary system vs. the presidential system is there. Some people still insist on the myth that the first Marcos Administration headed by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.'s late father, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., was really a parliamentary system. In reality. the Marcos "parliamentary" years during the Martial Law era, were still presidential (read why  here ). A simple research would show that Cesar Virata was called by the late Lee Kuan Yew, as a non-starter and no leader. LKY would know how a real parliamentary system works. Sure, it's one thing that those who consider themselves Dilawan, voice their criticisms. However, the big problem of the Dilawans is their focus on political idolatry rather than solutions. I can talk with the Dilawans all they want that we do need to shift to the parliamentary system and some of them still cry foul, say that it'll be a repetition of the first Marcos Admi...

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...

Don't Expect a Mahathir-Type Leader, Under the 1987 Constitution!

ABS CBN News Happy 100th birthday, Mahathir Mohamad! It's something that not so many people live up to 100, or more. The late Fidel V. Ramos passed away on July 31, 2022, at the age of 94. Ramos's advanced age may be the reason why the Omicron variant (which isn't supposedly fatal) ended his life. I'm posting this image of Ramos and Mahathir for one reason--Ramos wanted charter change back in the 1990s. However, plenty of anti-charter change commercials came in, the late Raul Roco said we only need a change in people, and we have Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who's in his late 80s but still active), and the idea that having a president who will rule for more than six years, is supposedly scary. Please, have they even thought that the late Pol Pot ruled Cambodia for just four years, but carried millions of deaths , that would make the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s 20-year reign  look tame (read here )? I've read posts on Facebook saying the Philippines just needs l...