Skip to main content

How the COVID-19 Pandemic and Anti-Vaxxers Made Me Remember the Great Louis Pasteur

It has been some time since I got vaccinated for COVID-19. Yes, we're achieving herd immunity. Yet, what truly bothered me in 2020 was the rise of the anti-vaxxers. There was even this crazy British conspiracy theorist named Kate Sheminari. During the pandemic, I decided to do a review of Louis Pasteur himself. Today, we have the Institut Pasteur in France, an international center for biomedical research. One may say that Edward Jenner was the man behind vaccination. True, we had Jenner and his fight against smallpox. We might as well discuss Louis Pasteur, the man whose name is used for the word pasteurization. 


I remembered watching a cartoon about Pasteur himself. It's often easy to credit Pasteur for milk. That's why I decided to get some milk tea after every vaccination. However, we need to credit Pasteur for the use of the attenuated microbes. It's said that his first vaccine used on humans was the rabies vaccine. Meanwhile, the experiment started with chicken and sheep. We always say we've got a herd of sheep. We often use the words flock and herd interchangeably. I guess that's why we use the term "herd immunity" for that reason. Pasteur vaccinated some sheep with the anthrax vaccine and some chickens with the cholera vaccine. Eventually, Pasteur decided to try and save a certain Joseph Meister with his first human vaccine. 

Pasteur had to face a lot of ridicule concerning his study of disease. Today, we've got the anti-vaxxers and the proponents of raw milk. Raw milk is practically dangerous even if the milk wasn't produced through animal cruelty. I really wouldn't drink raw milk, not especially with all the diseases associated with it. Pasteur was a man who was born during a time of disease. Pasteur lost three children to typhoid fever. That's why Pasteur pursued his studies. Over time, Pasteur's discoveries would lead to the future development of vaccines. The use of attenuated germs was the start of the vaccination program.

Watching some documentaries about Pasteur was helpful. It gave me hope that a COVID-19 vaccine would be created. Today, we've got the mRNA vaccine used. Still, one should always thank Pasteur's discovery of attenuated for that. mRNA or messenger ribonucleic acid of the virus to help the body identify. Institut Pasteur has adopted the mRNA. If Pasteur were alive today, he'd still accept mRNA vaccines. Pasteur would still recommend the COVID-19 vaccine. 

That's why I felt like getting a cup of dairy products after vaccination. I always felt celebrating my three vaccine shots with milk tea or a milk shake. It was to reward myself for facing the needle after many years I haven't been injected. Pasteur's discoveries would evolve beyond his grave. There are now modern methods of pasteurization and vaccine production. It's all because of this brave young scientist. Screw over the anti-vaxxers. Vaccination and pasteurization works!

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Facts vs. Gossip: The "Chona Mae" Incident is Proof You NEED to Verify What You Hear

It was in 2012 when the Chona Mae incident happened. I remember the panic when people were running the opposite direction while I was working at Downtown, Cebu. The traffic was bad. People were panikcing. But the real twist? It was actually a father looking for his daughter, whose identity we may never know.  The Cebu Daily News   said this last 2022, which was before entering the post-COVID world: CEBU CITY, Philippines — It has been a decade since the famous “Chona Mae” line was uttered by a father looking for her daughter after a 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the island of Cebu, February 6, 2012 .  From what was a simple call of a father to his daughter turned out to be the biggest tsunami scare in Cebu City.  “Ang tubig naa na sa Colon!” ("The Water is already in Colon!") was the line that has gotten everyone running on the street of Cebu looking for shelters up in the mountain parts of Cebu.  Today, we remember that frightful yet somehow funny day that w...
Read more

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...
Read more

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...
Read more

The 1986 Snap Elections Would Also Disprove the Myth of the "Marcos Parliament"

Anti-charter change proponents love to use Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. among their reasons, to defend their stand. The argument is that "charter change must be evil" because Marcos used it--a fallacy of Guilt by Association . Please, even Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo's supporter  Andrew James Masigan  supports charter change! Now, we must look at Marcos and remember another significant event. It's the 1986 snap elections and why it's also proof that we never had a parliamentary form of government. February 7, 1986, was when Marcos declared snap elections. Two years before the snap election, Marcos even declared that the Philippines was never a parliamentary government under him : The adoption of certain aspects of a parliamentary system in the amended Constitution does not alter its essentially presidential character . Article VII on the Presidency starts with this provision:  ‘the President shall be the Head of State and Chief Executive of the Republic of the Ph...
Read more

Why I Believe So Many Filipinos (Especially Boomers) Misunderstand (and Blindly Oppose) Charter Change

Okay, I'm no political analyst or historian. That doesn't mean I should just shut up and not share my opinion. I felt like I needed to publish this piece. This is where I want to examine another issue. I've noticed some people on Facebook are sharing the quotes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Some would try to do Ad Hominem attacks on me because I'm no constitutionalist (which I admit that I'm not). Just because I'm not a constitutionalist, doesn't mean, that I can't quote from the experts . Do I really need a degree in law at one of those prestigious universities in the Philippines? Sadly, some people are supposedly smarter than me but are the ones spreading nonsense.  Understanding charter change We need to see the definition first to understand why so many Filipinos, especially boomers , are so against it. The Philippine Star   gives this definition of charter change: Charter change, simply, is the process of introducing amendments or revisions to the ...
Read more