Skip to main content

The September 21 Luneta Park Protests will DO LITTLE TO NONE to Really Solve Corruption (Under the "Sacred" 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Angat Buhay

September 21 can always fill the mind with some thoughts. For Filipinos, it's the commemoration of when the late strongman, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., declared martial law, seemingly out of a whim. Martial law is still legal in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, provided that it has been studied accordingly by the legislature, whether or not it can be approved. For example, former president Rodrigo R. Duterte declared martial law in Mindanao when the Mautes attacked. Now, the rally against corruption in itself isn't inherently wrong. People need to do some peaceful protests, and it doesn't seem that the people were engaging in degrading behavior. Sometimes, we need to have a peaceful protest to be able to make a difference, as was what the late Martin Luther King Jr. did, to secure black rights, and how female rights activists fought to secure equal rights for men and women, such as Susan B. Anthony.

Now, we need to think about how one must look at the issue of corruption in the government. People tend to blame corrupt officials alone, without realizing that the bigger problem is within the system. It's gets annoying when I realize that I can talk about corruption all I want, but some of these people (not all) tend to act like the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a "sacred document", then they give sources to defend their claims like Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr., Atty. Christian Monsod, and the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (for Filipino Catholic faithful), which makes me give them a blank stare at their lack of practicality. In the process, they commit the fallacy of cherry picking with or without knowing it!

For example, Facebook pages like Silent No More PH, The Rule of Law Sentinel, La Verite, and We Are Millennials are all good examples of that. I will not focus too much on all their individual fallacies. Instead, I would like to look into their argument that tends to support Davide's views. Davide has often been viewed as defending claims like:

  1. The 1987 Constitution is the only constitution that is a public trust! (Read the refuttal here). 
  2. The 1987 Constitution, despite not being perfect, is the best in the world! (Really laughable given with the results). 
  3. The 1987 Constitution isn't the problem; it's just the people! (Ignores the relationships between people and systems)!
The very idea of trying to fight corruption (the symptom) under the outdated system is like this. Some countries may not replace the constitution all the time, but they have a more flexible pattern that can be done through legislation. One of the major problems in the Philippines is that it focuses on what's called the obsession with short-term solutions. Relying too much on rallies and protests is an overuse of a useful tool, to the point it becomes a blunt knife. A knife is a good tool but overuse can make it blunt. Sooner or later, you will need to discard that knife!

Whether we want to admit it or not, an abundance of corrupt officials are a result of  corruption (or errors) within the system


Sure, the 1987 Constitution has rules against corruption. It doesn't blatantly write that govenrment officials can steal or should steal. However, there are still major problems with the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines operates under a presidential system. Before people can bring up the myth of the Marcos parliament--they really need to look into the specifics of how a real parliamentary system works and not just dismiss the argument prematurely!

The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, running under a presidential system, makes it difficult to hold its president and the government, accountable. What are the reasons why despite the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines' warnings against corruption, that corruption prevails? It's because the accountability mechanism in itself, is a corruption. A corruption within a computer program can destroy the overall flow, or even cause frequent crashes. The same goes for any errors within the "sacred" 1987 Constitution. After all, that's what Article XVII is there for, to give amendments for the future times!

Unlike the parliamentary system, the presidential system doesn't have these features in a parliamentary system:
  1. Having a well-defined government facing off against a well-defined opposition. It's because it's all about party-based politics.The Philippines doesn't have that! If the Philippines had that, the Liberal Party today would be able to scrutinize the Government led by Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.! 
  2. Having weekly questioning between the government and the opposition. Those who were complaining about former health secretary Francisco Duque should ask themnselves, "How often was he called to answer for his performance?" 
  3. Weekly televised debates would either make (1) develop a sense of accountability, or (2) refusing to apply thinner on one's face can get one out. A parliamentary system isn't so that even the Devil will become good. Rather, it's all about making sure bad officials will barely enter and they lose their influence, no matter how much they will still have it! Bad politicians will become a black market in a competency-based system! 
As we look into it, those attending the September 21 protests need to ask themselves, "Are my rallies enough? Shouldn't we also protest for constititional reform, to make what we want, even more possible?" 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Wrong Assumption: Those Who Wish to Reform the 1987 Constitution are Automatically Marcos Loyalists and Diehard Duterte Supporters

Orion Perez Dumdum, founder of the CoRRECT Movement was featured in the INQUIRER.net page. It's no surprise that there would be detractors every now and then. Some people still believe that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that were so then why does Article XVII exist that the constitution is open for amendments ? It's no surprise that some idiot alleged that Orion is actually a Marcos supporter. The arguments by the anti-reforms are basically Nom Sequitur and Ad Hominem . The use of personal attacks and illogical conclusions are common argument flaws. In fact, one just needs to understand the poor Filipino logic . I remember all the stupidity going on. It's funny such people accuse me of Ad Hominems while doing Ad Hominems themselves! What I'd like to focus on is the Nom Sequitur. Its definition is: 1 : an inference (see inference sense 1) that does not follow from the premises (see premise entry 1 sense 1) specifically : a fallacy...
Read more

BRUTAL Truth: Stop HOPING for Another "PNoy-Like President" Because the Parliamentary System will Produce MUCH BETTER Leaders

Let me get this straight, I'm not here to totally dismiss the good that the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" C. Aquino III did. I'll try to be least biased  when I'm writing this to "give a shock" to those who tend to treat his term as a "magical time". However, I'm going to have to warn people about the problem of looking for "another Messiah leader". Yesterday was the would've been 66th birthday of Noynoy if he were alive. One can talk good about Noynoy's legacy. However, we need to realize that relying on Noynoy's term is a violation of the Mahathir Mohamad principle of "Never stop learning."  We need to think that there's only one Noynoy and when he died, he died . TV-5 reveals that Rep. Edgar Erice, a long-time friend of the late leader, also said the following: Caloocan City 2nd District Rep. Edgar Erice made the remark in a social media post marking Aquino’s 66th birth anniversary.  In the post, he co...
Read more

The Three Drug Mules Executed in China Last March 30, 2011

Al Jazeera Today is March 30, 2026. It has been 15 years since the execution of the three drug mules. Their names are Sally Ordinario-Villanueva, Ramon Credo (who was cremated in China shortly after his execution), and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never revealed, perhaps due to the loved ones requesting more privacy). Contrary to what one might think, the three drug mules weren't a trio. Instead, they were three separate cases that just happened to be scheduled to die on the same day.  They weren't a trio. They had a temporary reprieve when  former vice president Jejomar Binay tried to save them . Villanueva, together with Ramon Credo and Elizabeth Batain, was scheduled to be executed last month but got a reprieve after Vice President Jejomar Binay traveled to China and personally appealed to Chinese authorities. BBC   News even gave such a short news report, that I felt compelled to copy/paste the whole time as a reference here: Philippine Vice-President Jejomar Bin...
Read more

Justice for Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng

Would you still want to hate to follow rules? Well, it's time to think about the tragic loss of Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng , who lost his life because someone in the road didn't want to follow simple guidelines. It was two days ago when, suddenly, Kington's life was taken away from him. It was difficult for me to process what happened. I would like to share my thoughts of this reckless incident of what happens when laws are ignored. Either you become the victim (for not following rules) or you end up someone who follows rules (like what happened to Kingston). Here's something I found on Facebook : The Price of Paper Laws   Kingston Ralph Ko Cheng was 23. A Monash university graduate, a talented musician, and a café owner, he moved back to Cebu to build a life. That life ended on a pedestrian crossing near his home.   A speeding Toyota Innova hit him with such force it threw his body into a utility pole. The driver, 21-year-old Sean Andrew Pajarillo, had already hit a parke...
Read more

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...
Read more