Skip to main content

The September 21 Luneta Park Protests will DO LITTLE TO NONE to Really Solve Corruption (Under the "Sacred" 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Angat Buhay

September 21 can always fill the mind with some thoughts. For Filipinos, it's the commemoration of when the late strongman, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr., declared martial law, seemingly out of a whim. Martial law is still legal in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, provided that it has been studied accordingly by the legislature, whether or not it can be approved. For example, former president Rodrigo R. Duterte declared martial law in Mindanao when the Mautes attacked. Now, the rally against corruption in itself isn't inherently wrong. People need to do some peaceful protests, and it doesn't seem that the people were engaging in degrading behavior. Sometimes, we need to have a peaceful protest to be able to make a difference, as was what the late Martin Luther King Jr. did, to secure black rights, and how female rights activists fought to secure equal rights for men and women, such as Susan B. Anthony.

Now, we need to think about how one must look at the issue of corruption in the government. People tend to blame corrupt officials alone, without realizing that the bigger problem is within the system. It's gets annoying when I realize that I can talk about corruption all I want, but some of these people (not all) tend to act like the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a "sacred document", then they give sources to defend their claims like Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr., Atty. Christian Monsod, and the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (for Filipino Catholic faithful), which makes me give them a blank stare at their lack of practicality. In the process, they commit the fallacy of cherry picking with or without knowing it!

For example, Facebook pages like Silent No More PH, The Rule of Law Sentinel, La Verite, and We Are Millennials are all good examples of that. I will not focus too much on all their individual fallacies. Instead, I would like to look into their argument that tends to support Davide's views. Davide has often been viewed as defending claims like:

  1. The 1987 Constitution is the only constitution that is a public trust! (Read the refuttal here). 
  2. The 1987 Constitution, despite not being perfect, is the best in the world! (Really laughable given with the results). 
  3. The 1987 Constitution isn't the problem; it's just the people! (Ignores the relationships between people and systems)!
The very idea of trying to fight corruption (the symptom) under the outdated system is like this. Some countries may not replace the constitution all the time, but they have a more flexible pattern that can be done through legislation. One of the major problems in the Philippines is that it focuses on what's called the obsession with short-term solutions. Relying too much on rallies and protests is an overuse of a useful tool, to the point it becomes a blunt knife. A knife is a good tool but overuse can make it blunt. Sooner or later, you will need to discard that knife!

Whether we want to admit it or not, an abundance of corrupt officials are a result of  corruption (or errors) within the system


Sure, the 1987 Constitution has rules against corruption. It doesn't blatantly write that govenrment officials can steal or should steal. However, there are still major problems with the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines operates under a presidential system. Before people can bring up the myth of the Marcos parliament--they really need to look into the specifics of how a real parliamentary system works and not just dismiss the argument prematurely!

The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, running under a presidential system, makes it difficult to hold its president and the government, accountable. What are the reasons why despite the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines' warnings against corruption, that corruption prevails? It's because the accountability mechanism in itself, is a corruption. A corruption within a computer program can destroy the overall flow, or even cause frequent crashes. The same goes for any errors within the "sacred" 1987 Constitution. After all, that's what Article XVII is there for, to give amendments for the future times!

Unlike the parliamentary system, the presidential system doesn't have these features in a parliamentary system:
  1. Having a well-defined government facing off against a well-defined opposition. It's because it's all about party-based politics.The Philippines doesn't have that! If the Philippines had that, the Liberal Party today would be able to scrutinize the Government led by Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.! 
  2. Having weekly questioning between the government and the opposition. Those who were complaining about former health secretary Francisco Duque should ask themnselves, "How often was he called to answer for his performance?" 
  3. Weekly televised debates would either make (1) develop a sense of accountability, or (2) refusing to apply thinner on one's face can get one out. A parliamentary system isn't so that even the Devil will become good. Rather, it's all about making sure bad officials will barely enter and they lose their influence, no matter how much they will still have it! Bad politicians will become a black market in a competency-based system! 
As we look into it, those attending the September 21 protests need to ask themselves, "Are my rallies enough? Shouldn't we also protest for constititional reform, to make what we want, even more possible?" 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...
Read more

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...
Read more

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...
Read more

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...
Read more

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...
Read more