Skip to main content

Exploring the Stubborn Old Generation Chinoy


I watched the Bruce Lee Story back when I was in elementary school. I'd probably be 11-12 years old when I saw the movie, starring Jason Scott Lee (no relation to the later actor, Bruce Lee) as the titular character. Chinese Americans built Chinatown, to which they sought to preserve their community. In Philippine history, there was also the mutual loathing between the ethnic Chinese living in the Philippines and the Spanish. Of course, I had that "taught hatred" because of the Sangley Massacre incident that happened during the 1600s. There were two incidents, namely the Sangley Rebellion (1603) and the Sangley Rebellion (1663). The Intramuros Wall was built to regulate Chinese activity. There was a statement that Chinese people and Spanish people normally don't like to go out with each other. I heard that statement only when I realized that Francisco Juan "Paco" G. Larrañaga was actually innocent in regards to the unsolved Chiong Sisters case. However, Paco's sister Mimi is married to Miguel Syjuco, a half-Chinese man. 

As a Chinoy myself, I've actually had some upbringing. I didn't even consider myself Filipino for some time. "Filipino? I'm Chinese!" was what I would say, perhaps because of the rule of "Mang kan huan-a po!" or "Don't marry a Filipino woman!" Take note that the term huan-a actually refers to non-Chinese people in Southeast Asia. The term is also used in Malaysia and Indonesia, also Austronesian countries.  For some reason, older Chinoys never wanted to be referred to as Filipino, despite being in the Philippines. Since when did any Filipino constitution actually say that Filipinos must have brown skin or the trait of most Filipinos? It's kind of a back-and-forth thing. Like in the Bruce Lee Story, one could see a back-and-forth racism. The people in Chinatown didn't like Bruce taking in non-Chinese students. The Chinese didn't like the blacks, whites, Filipinos, etc. Well, sad to say, but such idiocy also exists among Chinoys, who may not even consider themselves Filipino. If one must say, "Don't marry a Filipino!" then why aren't they importing wives from China? Tough luck, given a gender imbalance, the chances are Mainland Chinese men may even want to consider marrying Filipino women! 

There are old Chinoys who refuse to give up on certain traditions, no matter how absurd, just because it was practiced. Of course, I'd bring up like, "Why aren't your daughters foot-folded?" I heard my paternal grandfather's mother was also foot-folded. Thankfully, none of her grandchildren were footfolded. Several traditions have been done for the sake of it. One of them was the fixed marriage, called boya in Tagalog and Cebuano. From what I heard, it was typical to get married to a person you had just met, at a very young age. Sometimes, one had to give up on that girlfriend (even if that girlfriend was Chinese) if the parents found a more feasible match, at least to their own view. Sometimes, the matching can happen as early as childhood. That means both the boy and the girl are below puberty when the match is given. Later on, proposed matches slowly replaced fixed marriages. It was like, "If it works, why not. Then not, don't force it." These types of marriages might explain why some infidelities happen when men commit adultery with non-Chinese women their age. Chances are that these mistresses might've been their former college sweethearts who were denied to them. 

If I'm not wrong, older generation Chinoys wanted to live like they were still in China. The Chinese Cultural Revolution happened under Mao Zedong. Mao wanted to erase all traces of Chinese tradition and replace it with his own traditions. Mao was a madman and a monster. The whole event caused Chinese emigration around the world, with Chinese seeking to preserve their culture somewhere else. However, some of them refused to evolve and think that culture is meant to evolve or die. For instance, are Filipinos today, by default, still living in a tribal system like they were before pre-colonial Spain? Is there still the Intramuros Wall between Spanish Filipinos and Chinese Filipinos? Today, you may even see Spanish Filipinos and Chinese Filipinos being best friends or even intermarrying with parental consent

However, several older Chinoys have this downright silly notion. It was often said, "I don't care who you marry, as long as you marry a Chinese person!" This, of course, can result in stuff in marrying a Chinese partner who's not good. A Chinoy man who has a decent huan-a girlfriend or a Chinoy woman has a decent huan-a boyfriend. The huan-a boyfriend may actually come from a decent family. However, they're forced to marry Chinese, even if the Chinese isn't good. Statements like, "I don't care if you marry a slut (called chao cha bo in Hokkien) as long di be kan la nang po (marry a Chinese woman)." For the women, they may hear something like, "I don't care if you marry a chao huan (bad boy) as long as di be kan la nang la me (Chinese man)." This would mean leaving that decent huan-a behind for a Chinese who's not good. Of course, regret comes later, but the same pattern of foolishness can persist for generations. It's because of the whole marry for the sake of marrying and marry Chinese for the sake of marrying Chinese. 

If they were truly concerned about preserving Chinese culture, they would need to realize that culture isn't static. Whether we want to admit it or not, culture isn't permanent. The Philippines is a good example. The Philippines, before being named the Philippines, was divided into several communities before Spain unified it. The Philippines adopted certain aspects of foreign culture, like Spanish culture and Chinese culture. China is no longer in the time of imperial rule. The Forbidden City is no longer the semblance of power. China was also occupied by the British. How sure are older generation Chinoys that they're still practicing "pure Chinese tradition"? Several traditions have been dying with the elderly. Today's Chinese women already know their rights. Back then, Chinese women were considered second-class citizens. Today, Chinese women have more of a voice than they used to, although some Chinese men still think otherwise.

Besides, the hypocrisy can also be exposed to an extreme. I've observed several bad habits common among the huan-a population in the Philippines. There's the bad habit of being habitually late, gatecrashing (as well as bringing gatecrashers), tactless comments, not saving up enough money, etc. However, do you think there are Chinoys not affected by such mentality, considering they're already born in the Philippines? As I mentioned earlier, there's this tendency to say that it's better to marry a chao la nang po (bad Chinese woman) than a ho huan-a po (good native Filipino woman). It might enter the double-standard where it's okay to tolerate Chinoys that engage in the bad habits that's predominant in the Philippines. Meanwhile, is it's not okay if huan-as are doing those habits? It may also be that it's better to date (or even marry) a Chinoy who does those things but not a  Pinoy who does those things? 

Culture has never meant ot be static. Right now, in China, some Chinese men are marrying Russian women, or even going to the West to find a wife. It's because some people didn't want to cease their "men are more valued than women", resulting in several aborted females. Whether we want to admit it or not, Xi Jinping its current ruler, isn't ruling as an emperor. Puyi became the last Chinese emperor. The Second World War ended with China from the Empire of Japan. The Empire of Japan died when the Chrysanthemum Throne became nothing but ceremonial. The Philippines' culture evolved over time such as when the Spanish came and the American Commonwealth period came. The Philippines became part of ASEAN. China also has the choice of either evolving or dying too. The Philippines did trade all over again with neighboring countries. 

Even the Chinese language is already evolving. I've read some disparaging comments against Hanyu Pinyin. Some are still insisting on the "purity" of Zhuyin. However, 

As a new generation Chinoy, I always feel that "pureblood Chinese" is a fantasy. It's as much of a fantasy as Adolf Hitler's "master race" plan. I doubt that there's still pure Chinese these days. China was occupied by the British. One may look at some Chinese celebrities and notice they have European features. One may look at how Taiwan is actually composed of the Han Chinese and the Malay-Indo people. That's why I also reject the notion of a "pureblood Filipino" due to the history. In the end, culture evolves, and one of the ways it evolves is through intermarriage. After all, just notice that some non-Chinese Filipinos have East Asian features too. Was it because they were descended from a Chinese trader, a Chinese pirate, or perhaps from a Japanese soldier and a comfort woman? With a long history, who can truly tell they're pureblood, whatever!

Popular posts from this blog

Facts vs. Gossip: The "Chona Mae" Incident is Proof You NEED to Verify What You Hear

It was in 2012 when the Chona Mae incident happened. I remember the panic when people were running the opposite direction while I was working at Downtown, Cebu. The traffic was bad. People were panikcing. But the real twist? It was actually a father looking for his daughter, whose identity we may never know.  The Cebu Daily News   said this last 2022, which was before entering the post-COVID world: CEBU CITY, Philippines — It has been a decade since the famous “Chona Mae” line was uttered by a father looking for her daughter after a 6.9 magnitude earthquake struck the island of Cebu, February 6, 2012 .  From what was a simple call of a father to his daughter turned out to be the biggest tsunami scare in Cebu City.  “Ang tubig naa na sa Colon!” ("The Water is already in Colon!") was the line that has gotten everyone running on the street of Cebu looking for shelters up in the mountain parts of Cebu.  Today, we remember that frightful yet somehow funny day that w...

The Foolishness of Complaining About Stupid Voters and Stupid Candidates, While Insisting the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "So Perfect"

I was looking into the Facebook page of Butthurt Philippines . Honestly, it's easy to complain but what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions? The art produced by its administrator shows some problems. However, if the administrator here believes that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "perfect as it is" (and he seems to be throwing a "saving face" by saying it was just sarcasm, and I failed to detect it) then it's really something. It's one thing to keep complaining. Complaining can be good. However, what's the use of complaining if you reject the solutions. Even worse, complaining about the quality of candidates for the upcoming 2025 midterm elections , while still saying, "It's not the system it's the people!" Please, that kind of thinking has been refuted even by basic psychology and political science! It's really good to point out the three problems. Distractions? Check. Keeping people hopeless? ...

Rare Interview Footage of Ninoy Aquino and Doy Laurel in Japan, Reveal Marcos Years Were NEVER a Legitimate Parliamentary System

People who are afraid of shifting to a parliamentary system tend to use the Marcos Years as proof. Fearmongers on Facebook are still up to their old tricks, using the Marcos Years to say, "No to cha-cha!" Never mind that a new constitution had to be written after 1986. If anything, Article XVII was inserted in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines because it was never meant to be set in stone. Also, the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines was illegal .  Here's a video of the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. and the late Salvador "Doy" Laurel. The words of Laurel here show the problem of Marcos' "parliament". Marcos' "parliament" lacked legitimacy . Where was the sporting chance of the Opposition? If it was a real parliamentary system, Ninoy would've been leading the Opposition in weekly debates against the Marcos-led government. That is if the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was the prime minister. If Cesar Vir...

The 1986 Snap Elections Would Also Disprove the Myth of the "Marcos Parliament"

Anti-charter change proponents love to use Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. among their reasons, to defend their stand. The argument is that "charter change must be evil" because Marcos used it--a fallacy of Guilt by Association . Please, even Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo's supporter  Andrew James Masigan  supports charter change! Now, we must look at Marcos and remember another significant event. It's the 1986 snap elections and why it's also proof that we never had a parliamentary form of government. February 7, 1986, was when Marcos declared snap elections. Two years before the snap election, Marcos even declared that the Philippines was never a parliamentary government under him : The adoption of certain aspects of a parliamentary system in the amended Constitution does not alter its essentially presidential character . Article VII on the Presidency starts with this provision:  ‘the President shall be the Head of State and Chief Executive of the Republic of the Ph...

Why I Believe So Many Filipinos (Especially Boomers) Misunderstand (and Blindly Oppose) Charter Change

Okay, I'm no political analyst or historian. That doesn't mean I should just shut up and not share my opinion. I felt like I needed to publish this piece. This is where I want to examine another issue. I've noticed some people on Facebook are sharing the quotes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. Some would try to do Ad Hominem attacks on me because I'm no constitutionalist (which I admit that I'm not). Just because I'm not a constitutionalist, doesn't mean, that I can't quote from the experts . Do I really need a degree in law at one of those prestigious universities in the Philippines? Sadly, some people are supposedly smarter than me but are the ones spreading nonsense.  Understanding charter change We need to see the definition first to understand why so many Filipinos, especially boomers , are so against it. The Philippine Star   gives this definition of charter change: Charter change, simply, is the process of introducing amendments or revisions to the ...