Skip to main content

The Philippines "Buwan ng Wika" May Be More Appropriately Called "Buwan ng Kasaysayan"

It's August, meaning it's time for Buwan ng Wika. It's called the Month of the Language in English. As always, please be reminded that I'm a Chinese Filipino. That means I'll be posting some videos in Tagalog (without subtitles), and I'll apologize in advance. August became the designated month for the celebration of Buwan ng Wika. 

I'd like to recall how the Buwan ng Wika programs are being done. I remember being a participant (but never the star of the show) during my high school days. What happens is that Buwan ng Wika almost feels like a repeat performance of the National Heritage Month, which is done during May. Is it because of the schedule where children take their vacation from April to May? Well, there are college students and some of those who need to take summer classes, because they failed a certain subject. Cebu has the "Gabii sa Kabilin" or "Night of the Heritage" during May. However, I tend to overlook that, in favor of the "Buwan ng Wika" celebrations.

Quite interestingly, I ran across this Facebook post by Lanao Del Norte official, Mayor Angel "Tata" Yap: 

While August is widely recognized as "Buwan ng Wika" (National Language Month) in the Philippines, it is also officially declared as "Buwan ng Kasaysayan" (History Month). 

This dual designation stems from the numerous significant historical events that occurred in August, including:

- The Cry of Pugad Lawin (Balintawak) (August 23-26, 1896):  This event is considered the start of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish rule. 

- The Proclamation of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente (Aglipayan Church) (August 3, 1902):  This marked a significant step towards Filipino religious independence from Spanish control. 

- The Jones Law (August 29, 1916): This law, enacted by the US Congress, formally declared the US government's intent to grant independence to the Philippines. 

- The Establishment of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (August 8, 1967):  The Philippines was one of the founding members of this regional organization. 

Therefore, August is a crucial month for Filipinos to reflect on their history, celebrate their national language, and acknowledge the events that shaped their nation. While it may not be officially declared as "Filipino Month," the significance of August in Philippine history and culture makes it a month of national importance.

National Heritage Month feels overlooked, and Buwan Ng Wika gains its advantage. In fact, one can look at the way Buwan Ng Wika programs are. These programs tend to showcase stuff like:

  1. Display of different Filipino dances, both influenced by Spanish colonization and the indigenous dances.
  2. Having a dramatization of a Filipino story. I remember Noli Me Tangere was dramatized in my high school days.
  3. Talking about Filipino history, such as the colonization history and those who traded with the Philippines. I remember playing the part of an American, despite the fact that I'm a Chinoy. Funny but true.
I've seen Buwan ng Wika activities include showcases, depicting Filipino culture and history more than Filipino languages. Speaking in Tagalog during history classes was done back when I was in high school. I could remember how we spoke Tagalog during Asian History class and World History class, during Buwan ng Wika. 

Not much talk on the different languages of the Philippines. Instead, all the activities tend to focus on celebrating Filipino heritage and history! I wonder if National Heritage Month feels redundant since Buwan ng Wika tends to overshadow it. However, celebrating history isn't celebrating heritage. Heritage talks more about the culture passed down from one generation to another. Basically, the focus has been more on Philippine history.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Ninoy's Words, "We Had a Parliamentary Form of Government WITHOUT a Parliament!"

Some people on Facebook continually spread the lie, "The parliamentary form of government will never work because the Marcos Sr. years were a parliament!" The idea is incredibly stupid when you realize some old information that they probably ignored. It's a shame that some boomers refuse to surf the Internet to find decades-old information  that would prove it otherwise. Come on, are they even too lazy to order Third World to First written by the late Lee Kuan Yew and only use it to criticize the Marcoses?  With the late Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr., I really must highlight that he actually spilled out much truth in this speech done in Los Angeles in 1981: And so my friends, we started with an American-type constitution, we move to a British-type constitution.  We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament. Until 1978, we did not have a parliament. And yet, we were supposed to be a parliamentary from of government.  And Mr. Marcos said, ...

Today in History: Hanoi's Liberation Day

Vietnam Times October 10 is mostly associated with Double 10 in Taiwan. However, Communism has its celebration with Hanoi Liberation Day . I got this information from the Vietnam Times on what the day is all about: Along with the victory of Dien Bien Phu campaign, the Geneva Agreements on armistice in Indochina was signed. After many days of struggling in the Geneva Conference, agreements on transfering Hanoi to the Vietnamese people were finally signed on September 30th and October 2nd 1954 in the United Armistice Center Committee. Following the Resolution on September 17th 1954 of the Government Council, the City Troops Committee of Hanoi was established with General Vuong Thua Vu, the commander of the Pioneer Division, as the Chairman and doctor Tran Duy Hung as the Vice Chairman. The City Troops Committee of Hanoi had the task of taking over and managing the city. The Military Commanders ordered the Vietnamese soldier units to take over the city of Hanoi and abide by the policies ...

Are People Who Say Systems Don't Matter Be Willing to Prove Their Claims for a Million Pesos?

People often argue that it's not the system but the people who run it. Some people have their examples like the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III and former Philippine vice president Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" S. Gerona-Robredo. They would say that both Noynoy and Leni are "prime examples" why charter change isn't needed, just a change of people in power. Some people even say that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is "inviolate". If that's so then what happened to Article XVII that makes it open to amendments? Why wasn't that even used? That means even making a new constitution isn't illegal per se--unless one did what Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. did during the martial law era! However, if we understand simple psychological science, we need to look at basic psychology. Please, I don't need a doctorate in certain degrees, in the Greenbelt Universities, to understand that there are mist...