The Philippines "Buwan ng Wika" May Be More Appropriately Called "Buwan ng Kasaysayan"

It's August, meaning it's time for Buwan ng Wika. It's called the Month of the Language in English. As always, please be reminded that I'm a Chinese Filipino. That means I'll be posting some videos in Tagalog (without subtitles), and I'll apologize in advance. August became the designated month for the celebration of Buwan ng Wika.

I'd like to recall how the Buwan ng Wika programs are being done. I remember being a participant (but never the star of the show) during my high school days. What happens is that Buwan ng Wika almost feels like a repeat performance of the National Heritage Month, which is done during May. Is it because of the schedule where children take their vacation from April to May? Well, there are college students and some of those who need to take summer classes, because they failed a certain subject. Cebu has the "Gabii sa Kabilin" or "Night of the Heritage" during May. However, I tend to overlook that, in favor of the "Buwan ng Wika" celebrations.

Quite interestingly, I ran across this Facebook post by Lanao Del Norte official, Mayor Angel "Tata" Yap:

While August is widely recognized as "Buwan ng Wika" (National Language Month) in the Philippines, it is also officially declared as "Buwan ng Kasaysayan" (History Month).
This dual designation stems from the numerous significant historical events that occurred in August, including:
- The Cry of Pugad Lawin (Balintawak) (August 23-26, 1896): This event is considered the start of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish rule.
- The Proclamation of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente (Aglipayan Church) (August 3, 1902): This marked a significant step towards Filipino religious independence from Spanish control.
- The Jones Law (August 29, 1916): This law, enacted by the US Congress, formally declared the US government's intent to grant independence to the Philippines.
- The Establishment of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (August 8, 1967): The Philippines was one of the founding members of this regional organization.
Therefore, August is a crucial month for Filipinos to reflect on their history, celebrate their national language, and acknowledge the events that shaped their nation. While it may not be officially declared as "Filipino Month," the significance of August in Philippine history and culture makes it a month of national importance.

National Heritage Month feels overlooked, and Buwan Ng Wika gains its advantage. In fact, one can look at the way Buwan Ng Wika programs are. These programs tend to showcase stuff like:

Display of different Filipino dances, both influenced by Spanish colonization and the indigenous dances.
Having a dramatization of a Filipino story. I remember Noli Me Tangere was dramatized in my high school days.
Talking about Filipino history, such as the colonization history and those who traded with the Philippines. I remember playing the part of an American, despite the fact that I'm a Chinoy. Funny but true.

I've seen Buwan ng Wika activities include showcases, depicting Filipino culture and history more than Filipino languages. Speaking in Tagalog during history classes was done back when I was in high school. I could remember how we spoke Tagalog during Asian History class and World History class, during Buwan ng Wika.

Not much talk on the different languages of the Philippines. Instead, all the activities tend to focus on celebrating Filipino heritage and history! I wonder if National Heritage Month feels redundant since Buwan ng Wika tends to overshadow it. However, celebrating history isn't celebrating heritage. Heritage talks more about the culture passed down from one generation to another. Basically, the focus has been more on Philippine history.

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos." I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already tarnished image in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the unjust British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...

A Business Graduate's Reviewing History Blog

Search This Blog