Skip to main content

Ignacio Paua: Born Mainland Chinese, Died Filipino

Does one have to be born Filipino to be truly Filipino? That was a question my Filipino teacher asked to provoke the mind, back when I was in the Fourth Year of High School. Chinoys may have their identity crisis. It can be like, "If Chinoys are already Filipinos, why are they forbidden from marrying Filipinos?" The term huan-a can be derogatory. The term huan-a is also used in Malaysia and Indonesia, referring to anyone of Malay-Indo descent. In the Philippines, huan-a refers to Filipinos of Malay-Indo descent. 

Back in college, I researched and stumbled on the name Jose Ignacio Paua, a Filipino who was actually born in China. Jose Ignacio was born in Lao-Na in Fujian Province. His real name would've been Lâu Hingpua̍h (劉亨賻) or Liú HÄ“ngfu in Mandarin. It was at that time when I realized that several Filipino heroes, were actually Chinese by blood such as Jose Rizal, Emilio Aguinaldo (though this is debatable since he did questionable stuff), Vicente Lim, Lorenzo Ruiz (a martyr during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines, actually Lorenzo Dy), Tomas Pinpin, Sergio Osmeña Sr., Roman Ongpin, Mariano Limjap, Julian Felipe, and the 13 Martyrs of Cavite. 

Honestly, I tend to exist as a critic of Andres Bonifacio, and I tend to lean towards Aguinaldo. Unlike most Katipuneros of Chinese descent (and they were already mixed due to interbreeding with either Indios or, in some rare cases, with Spaniards), Ignacio was actually born in China. The Tulay website gives this information on Ignacio as a Chinese turned Filipino:

Paua was born on April 29, 1872 in an impoverished village of Lao-na in Fujian province, China. In 1890, he accompanied his uncle to seek his fortune in the Philippines. He served first as an apprentice blacksmith on Jaboneros Street, Binondo, a job he held for many years until he became an expert. His knowledge as blacksmith served him in good stead during the revolution. He became an expert in the repair of native cannons called lantakas and many other kinds of weaponry.

Basically, this was centuries after the Sangley Rebellion, which was pretty much mutual hatred between Spaniards and Chinese. Honestly, I'm glad I'm not living during the Intramuros Days! I could've been forced into isolation or would've perished during the Sangley Rebellion! What was noted was that Ignacio was once from an impoverished village. Unlike other Chinese Filipinos that time, Ignacio was naturalized at 18 years of age. However, historian Teodoro F. Agoncillo would later say that Ignacio was more Filipino than many Filipinos. In short, how many are born Filipino but are actually doing things that are disgraceful for the Filipino identity?

It would be hard to imagine, but this naturalized foreigner was actually responsible for helping overthrow the Spaniards. Just reading this makes me think of pragmatic war strategy:

At the outbreak of revolution in 1896, Paua quickly joined the army. Aware of the acute shortage of arms, he suggested to Aguinaldo to set up an ammunition factory in Imus, Cavite. With the help of his fellow Chinese blacksmiths, he finished the arsenal in two days time.

“Under his skillful supervision, old cannons and broken Mausers captured from the enemy were repaired; large bamboo cannons taped with wires were manufactured, numerous paltiks (crude firearms) were made, and thousands of cartridges were filled up with home-made gunpowder.” (Gregorio Zaide, p. 5).

Not only did he manage the factory, he also taught the Filipinos how to melt metals, including church bells, for the manufacture of the much-needed arms and bullets for the revolutionary army.

Just imagine if there were no Chinese Filipinos during the revolution. Would the fight for independence against Spain be successful? It's irritating to read ignorant comments against Chinoys, as if Chinoys are even Mainlanders. Some boomer Filipino idiots say, "You favor foreign investment because you're Chinese." Please, do they even realize foreign investment's sources are from any country and not just China? Sadly, some degree of bigotry still exists in the Philippines against Chinoys. Fortunately, that degree of racism is nowhere near as bad as discrimination against non-whites in the USA.

However, Ignacio was a Mainlander who had become a Filipino at heart! As I was reading through the biography, this can also be read:

When the Filipino-American war broke out, Paua was again at the forefront of the battle. Taught in the rigid discipline of martial arts, he trained his men well. Among the very few battles won against the superior fire power of the Americans were those led by Paua.

Paua became a scourge of the American troops, who greatly feared his attacks. UP historian Prof. Luis Dery wrote: “The ferocity with which he contested every inch of Philippine soil lost to the American troops showed his total transformation from Chinese to Filipino — in heart and in deed.”

In another detail, Ignacio may have married a non-Chinese, after all

It was often taboo for Chinese to marry non-Chinese. I often got into trouble for speaking huan-a oi (Malay-Indo dialect, which includes Filipino dialects). Chinese Filipinos were always told to "Never marry huan-a." The anger can often be more directed because the husband is having an affair with a huan-a po (Malay-Indo woman). Never mind that the huan-a po may have been his college sweetheart denied to him by overly demanding Chinese parents, who live in the Philippines but refuse to be called Filipino. Like what? In my case, I had the American dream and thought of marrying a blonde-haired, blue-eyed hot woman, and never return to the Philippines! But now, that dream may no longer be feasible. 

I talked about Ignacio, and I was asked, "What? You would still want to marry a huan-a?" However, it seems that Ignacio was probably married to a huan-a. Ignacio's wife may have been a huan-a, given the surname. Again, I could be wrong, and maybe Ignacio's wife was still a Sangley, carrying the Imperial surname. Chinoy TV gives this detail on his married life:
The Chinese community in the Philippines has significantly contributed to our country’s culture, history, and traditions. This is evident in the legacy of Gen. Paua, who inspired Chinese immigrants to become proactive in fighting for the land that embraced them as its own. 

After the war settled, Gen. Paua married Carolina Imperial and was elected Mayor of Manito, Albay. He died of cancer on May 24, 1926, establishing his legacy through a statue dedicated to him in Silang, Cavite and Legazpi, Albay, a street named after him in Imus, and a historical marker laid in Camp Pantaleon. 

This Filipino girl may have been a Spanish woman born in the Philippines, a Malay woman (the huan-a), or a Chinese Filipino. For that, I couldn't be certain if this Carolina Imperial was actually a huan-a po or a Spanish woman. All that was known was that she was identified as a Filipino woman. This might be my ticket to actually marrying a woman I like, who's not ethnically Chinese. I could say that Ignacio was from China, but wait, he married a huan-a po! This should also be a shame to other Chinese Filipinos, who refused to call themselves Filipino. Please, the word Filipino should never be regarded as a race but as a nationality. The same goes for American. When I think of the USA team that beat China's team, they may be Chinese by blood, but they're still American. Right now, I've considered myself more Filipino than ever, despite my Chinese blood! It may also be because some people I know are married to Chinese Filipinos, got into troublesome marriages. 

In other ways, Ignacio's marriage may have proven that culture isn't static either. After all, the Philippines was once a nation of natives. Over time, the Philippines evolved because of the Spanish, American, and Japanese occupation. The Empire of Japan died during the Second World War, and Japan changed its culture. Ignacio became Filipinized, even when he only moved to the Philippines at age 18. 

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Celebrities and Political Dynasties Running for Politics While DEFENDING Presidential and Rejecting Parliamentary?

2025 is just around the corner for the midterm elections . People keep emphasizing the need to "defend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines" for any amendments whatsoever. If that were true then we really need to remove Article XVII entirely if the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines was meant to be set in stone (read here ). Several camps whether it's PDP-Laban supporters, Liberal Party of the Philippines supporters, Uniteam supporters, etc.--I can expect social media mudslinging at its finest . I keep talking about the need to amend or even replace the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, they keep acting like it's the best constitution in the world, they cite Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and others like the Monsods) to idolatrous levels , and when I talk about the parliamentary system--I can expect the whole, "Boohoo! It will never work because we already tried it under Marcos! The proof was Cesar Virata!" However, I wrote a refute on that ...

The EDSA Revolution of 1986 Would've Never Happened if People were Stuck in Nostalgia

  It's something that I read crybaby comments online where people are saying, "Making EDSA a special working day is making us forget the glory of EDSA." Please, let me remind people that even 10 years later , neither the late Lee Kuan Yew's birthday nor his death anniversary has become a national holiday in Singapore! Singapore simply honored LKY's birthday by working on that day. I was laughing at the toxic Facebook page called We Are Millennials. What truly made me think that these people are stuck in nostalgia is that EDSA 1986 would never have been possible if the Filipinos were stuck in nostalgia . I remember talks about how the first Marcos administration was built on these two pillars. The first pillar was information control . The other pillar was toxic positivity. I remember back in 1995 when the social studies teacher talked about how he thought that Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was a "good president" due to the long holidays. However, the holidays ...

No to Cha Cha Because of EDSA?

Back when I was in elementary, we were told that EDSA 1986 was a good thing. I don't want to deny the well-documented human rights abuses of the first Marcos Administration . The repeated call to amend or reform the constitution has unfortunately been demonized as if it's always a bad thing. I guess that's a result of people with poor reading (and listening) comprehension for so long . If only people started to read in-between the details of Philippine history, if only people read through the book From Third World to First and not just quote the late Lee Kuan Yew about the Marcoses, they'll see that using EDSA to demonize charter change is really a bad move. Startling facts during the Marcos Years that may have been ignored by anti-charter change proponents What happened during EDSA was practically a revolutionary government . Above is a video of the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy. I confess that I do tend to admire Ninoy, especially with his Los Angeles sp...

[OPINION] Why Do Some Filipino Boomers Insist that the Marcos Years Were Under a "Parliamentary System"

  This is a screenshot I got on Facebook. The Tweet is courtesy of Raissa Espinosa-Robles, who I hear is a marites or a gossiper. I'm not denying that there are some truths in what she said. It's true that the Marcos Years have their well-documented human rights abuses. However, Mrs. Robles still continues to insist in the myth of a parliamentary system under Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s regime. It's not just Mrs. Robles but also some Filipino boomers who keep saying, "Are you crazy? We had a parliamentary system under Marcos."  I could show them some evidence like Marcos' severe lack of legitimacy to disprove the parliamentary systme. I even wrote about the snap elections because Marcos was a president with powers (read here ). Under a parliamentary system, the president is purely ceremonial. The president is just a door opener and credentials receiver! Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. and Salvador "Doy" Laurel both challenged the legitimacy of Marcos...

Why EDSA Should Be a Reason to Support, NOT Oppose Cha Cha

  I don't doubt that the EDSA Revolution left a legacy to the world. Yesterday, I wrote a piece where I asked if EDSA should be a reason to say no to cha-cha . It was a peaceful revolution though it's often argued that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. didn't want to further ruin his already  tarnished image  in front of the world. How true was it that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., in his younger days, wanted to run over the protestors? However, consider EDSA wasn't really one of a kind. The Indian pacifist Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi, and his  writings inspired the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. aka Ninoy . also led a similar revolution against the  unjust  British occupation of India during that time. Gandhi may have been dead by the time Ninoy read about Gandhi. However, Gandhi's peaceful protests left a legacy that was probably not so well-known before. Today, the Indian economy has been doing better than the Philippines. I even consult...